Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?How do foci and...
Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?
Use of undefined constant bloginfo
Co-worker team leader wants to inject his friend's awful software into our development. What should I say to our common boss?
A link redirect to http instead of https: how critical is it?
Existence of subset with given Hausdorff dimension
How to deal with a cynical class?
Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?
Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?
Happy pi day, everyone!
What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
Why doesn't using two cd commands in bash script execute the second command?
Gantt Chart like rectangles with log scale
Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is
What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?
What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?
Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?
Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?
How can I track script which gives me "command not found" right after the login?
Why does Bach not break the rules here?
how to draw discrete time diagram in tikz
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
What do Xenomorphs eat in the Alien series?
How to use deus ex machina safely?
Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?
How do foci and somatic+material components interact when it comes to occupying a hand?Can you cast spells with a Somatic component if you're holding a two-handed weapon?Crafting an Improvised Spellcasting Focus?Can a multiclass Cleric/Warlock hold a Holy Shield and an Arcane Staff and still cast spells?Where should I report printing errors in Xanathar's Guide to Everything?Where can I purchase a legal Xanathar's Guide to Everything PDF?Can I use a hand holding a focus from one class to cover somatic components for a spell from another class?Do you need a “gameplay-wise” free hand to handle material components?Portent, as it relates to the Gambling downtime rules from Xanathar's Guide to EverythingWhat is the correct interpretation of the Gambling Results table in Xanathar's Guide to Everything?
$begingroup$
I see that, for example:
A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.
Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.
What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.
Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?
dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see that, for example:
A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.
Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.
What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.
Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?
dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see that, for example:
A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.
Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.
What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.
Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?
dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components
New contributor
$endgroup$
I see that, for example:
A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.
Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.
What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.
Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?
dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components
dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
T.J.L.
33.3k5116174
33.3k5116174
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman
2277
2277
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Hat of Wizardry says...
This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:
You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.
You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]
The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.
Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.
The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143251%2fdo-these-spellcasting-foci-from-xanathars-guide-to-everything-have-to-be-held-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Hat of Wizardry says...
This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:
You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.
You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]
The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.
Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.
The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Hat of Wizardry says...
This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:
You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.
You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]
The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.
Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.
The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Hat of Wizardry says...
This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:
You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.
You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]
The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.
Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.
The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.
$endgroup$
The Hat of Wizardry says...
This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:
You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.
You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]
The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.
Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.
The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.
answered 4 hours ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
33.3k5116174
33.3k5116174
3
$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143251%2fdo-these-spellcasting-foci-from-xanathars-guide-to-everything-have-to-be-held-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
4 hours ago