Gsyfuy

Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing

Is using an 'empty' metaphor considered bad style?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

Why is Agricola named as such?

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Can I make estimated tax payments instead of withholding from my paycheck?

What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?

Am I a Rude Number?

Eww, those bytes are gross

How do I append a character to the end of every line in an Excel cell?

Play Zip, Zap, Zop

How can a school be getting an epidemic of whooping cough if most of the students are vaccinated?

How to deal with an incendiary email that was recalled

Gear reduction on large turbofans

Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?

Why did Luke use his left hand to shoot?

Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?

Difference between i++ and (i)++ in C

How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?

Why don't hotels mount air conditioning units outside the rooms?

How much mayhem could I cause as a sentient fish?

If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?

Why was Lupin comfortable with saying Voldemort's name?

What evolutionary advantage do viruses have in host specificity?

use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?

Musical Harmony: When to use more than three chordsHow do you write successive, non-functional chord progressions?English name for 3-tone chords that have the bass tone different from the rootShould I use inversion or root position?Can chord substitutions take place unrestrictedly without invalidating a progression?What is the most efficient way to memorize chord changes?Interpretation of this Chord ProgressionThe sudden switch from C major to C minor in Wake me up when September ends and a Solo Acoustic versionF Dm Am C (Lydian?) ProgressionWhy does VII have dominant function in natural minor

2

I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:

The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:

I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?

chord-theory harmony chord-progressions chord-inversions

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

add a comment | 

2

I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:

The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:

I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?

chord-theory harmony chord-progressions chord-inversions

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

add a comment | 

I came across the following chord progression, which I really like:

The iii4/2 chord adds a lot to the progression in comparison to the following:

I'm sure you could wrap your head around these progressions--I am just sharing the images for reference. My question: is there a reason why the first progression is more satisfying the the second? I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi. That's about as far as my analysis goes. I understand this my reaction to the chord changes is somewhat subjective, but can you see any technical reason I find the first progression more compelling/satisfying?

chord-theory harmony chord-progressions chord-inversions

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

edited 2 hours ago

Richard

41.6k691176

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

asked 3 hours ago

286642286642

1018

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!
  
  – 286642
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80673%2fuse-of-4-2-chord-more-compelling-than-root-position%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!
  
  – 286642
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  thanks as always for the amazing answer @richard!
  
  – 286642
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I see at least two reasons:

1. Tonal music is really built on the contrast of consonance and dissonance; the inherent tension and release of that dichotomy is what moves tonal music forward. Your second progression only uses consonant major and minor triads, and so it lacks much tension. But your first progression includes a dissonant seventh chord that brings in tension and helps push the music towards its release on the vi triad.


2. Similar to the first point, the second progression is completely made up of root-position chords. Your first progression includes an inverted harmony (the iii42) that adds a new sound and therefore interest to the progression.

Two other comments based on your question:

1. If you're writing your first progression according to the "rules" of college-level music theory, note that chordal sevenths will almost always resolve down by step. As such, the D in the bass of your iii42 should resolve down by step to C, not down by leap to A.


2. If you're interested, play around with making the soprano pitch in m. 2 a G♯ instead of G♮. That makes this chord what we call a secondary dominant that will lead even more strongly to the vi chord.


3. 
   

   You say

   
   
   

   
   

   I looked at the root movement in the two progressions, and the iii-vi features movement of a descending fifth, which should sound stronger than that of the falling fourth in the iii4/2-vi.

   
   

   
   

Note that the root motion is still the same, because the roots of those two chords are still E and A, a descending fifth. It's the bass motion that changes when you change the inversion of that iii chord.

PS: If you really like this chord progression, check out the theme to the US version of "The Office" :-)

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176

answered 2 hours ago

RichardRichard

41.6k691176