AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

As a beginner, should I get a Squier Strat with a SSS config or a HSS?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

Time to Settle Down!

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Performance gap between vector<bool> and array

Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

Generate an RGB colour grid

Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode

Find 108 by using 3,4,6

What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

Illegal assignment from sObject to Id

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Disembodied hand growing fangs

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

Trademark violation for app?

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

Would the Life Transference spell be unbalanced if it ignored resistance and immunity?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

5

$begingroup$

I want to create a Abjuration wizard (PHB, p. 115-116) that uses the Life Transference spell (XGtE, p. 160) and the Arcane Ward feature to heal people, but I've heard people saying Life Transference is bad due to how it interacts with resistance (half the damage taken = half the healing).

That is pretty relevant for me, because of the Spell Resistance feature that Abjuration wizards get at 14th level.

What if Life Transference worked like the Overchannel feature from the School of Evocation wizard (PHB, p. 118): necrotic damage that ignores resistance and immunity?

I believe that would be very thematically appropriate considering the fact that it is a self-sacrifice spell. I know that this is all up to the DM, but I want to know: Would that be unbalanced? Could that somehow be exploited?

dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

27.5k597167

asked 4 hours ago

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso

261

New contributor

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
  $endgroup$
  – Xirema
  4 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
  $endgroup$
  – Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
  $endgroup$
  – Gandalfmeansme
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
  $endgroup$
  – Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

5

$begingroup$

I want to create a Abjuration wizard (PHB, p. 115-116) that uses the Life Transference spell (XGtE, p. 160) and the Arcane Ward feature to heal people, but I've heard people saying Life Transference is bad due to how it interacts with resistance (half the damage taken = half the healing).

That is pretty relevant for me, because of the Spell Resistance feature that Abjuration wizards get at 14th level.

What if Life Transference worked like the Overchannel feature from the School of Evocation wizard (PHB, p. 118): necrotic damage that ignores resistance and immunity?

I believe that would be very thematically appropriate considering the fact that it is a self-sacrifice spell. I know that this is all up to the DM, but I want to know: Would that be unbalanced? Could that somehow be exploited?

dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

27.5k597167

asked 4 hours ago

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso

261

New contributor

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Just to clarify: what you're proposing is allowing the spell to fully ignore the spellcaster's possible Necrotic Resistance, meaning the spell would deal full damage to the spellcaster even if they have resistance, and therefore heal the normal amount to their target? Or are you proposing allowing the healing to be equal to 4x the damage in the scenario where the spellcaster has resistance?
  $endgroup$
  – Xirema
  4 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The first option, just ignore necrotic resistance fully and always heal the normal amount. I believe it is only appropriate considering it is a self sacrifice.
  $endgroup$
  – Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Could you clarify something? I'm not sure how Arcane Ward is involved in this process. How are you using it to heal people?
  $endgroup$
  – Gandalfmeansme
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The Arcane Ward takes the damage instead of me, it's basically similar to having temporary hit points. That way I can basically trasform the hit points of the ward (say the ward takes 10 damage) into double the amount of hit points to someone else (in this case 20) without taking any damage myself.
  $endgroup$
  – Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

$begingroup$

I want to create a Abjuration wizard (PHB, p. 115-116) that uses the Life Transference spell (XGtE, p. 160) and the Arcane Ward feature to heal people, but I've heard people saying Life Transference is bad due to how it interacts with resistance (half the damage taken = half the healing).

That is pretty relevant for me, because of the Spell Resistance feature that Abjuration wizards get at 14th level.

What if Life Transference worked like the Overchannel feature from the School of Evocation wizard (PHB, p. 118): necrotic damage that ignores resistance and immunity?

I believe that would be very thematically appropriate considering the fact that it is a self-sacrifice spell. I know that this is all up to the DM, but I want to know: Would that be unbalanced? Could that somehow be exploited?

dnd-5e spells balance wizard house-rules

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

27.5k597167

asked 4 hours ago

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso

261

New contributor

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

27.5k597167

asked 4 hours ago

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso

261

New contributor

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

27.5k597167

asked 4 hours ago

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso

261

New contributor

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

27.5k597167

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

27.5k597167

asked 4 hours ago

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso

261

New contributor

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo CorsoGabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso

261

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

$begingroup$

This is perfectly reasonable

Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.

So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

XiremaXirema

24.4k269144

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
  $endgroup$
  – Miniman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

This would not be imbalanced.

The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.

The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Blake SteelBlake Steel

4,6591952

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Gabriel Irabel Cirilo Corso is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145429%2fwould-the-life-transference-spell-be-unbalanced-if-it-ignored-resistance-and-imm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

$begingroup$

This is perfectly reasonable

Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.

So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

XiremaXirema

24.4k269144

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
  $endgroup$
  – Miniman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

This is perfectly reasonable

Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.

So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

XiremaXirema

24.4k269144

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The OP specifically mentioned the exploit they intend to use - fuelling Life Transference with Arcane Ward.
  $endgroup$
  – Miniman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

This is perfectly reasonable

Of course, it'll come down to what your DM says, since this is not Rules-as-Written. But Life Transference already has a quite substantial opportunity cost associated with it, and all this change does is revert to the mean, so to speak: instead of the feature being weaker for Abjuration Wizards, it's instead normal strength.

So if I were DM, I'd be perfectly fine allowing this. The few possible exploits are things that would be exploitable for non-abjuration wizards anyways, so I can't even think of what might constitute an exploit particular to this combo.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

XiremaXirema

24.4k269144

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

XiremaXirema

24.4k269144

answered 3 hours ago

XiremaXirema

24.4k269144

answered 3 hours ago

XiremaXirema

24.4k269144

1

$begingroup$

This would not be imbalanced.

The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.

The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Blake SteelBlake Steel

4,6591952

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

This would not be imbalanced.

The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.

The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Blake SteelBlake Steel

4,6591952

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

This would not be imbalanced.

The features like Spell Resistance and Inured to Undeath (both for wizards) are perfectly fine on all other characters, and life transference works as intended on most other characters.

The question, therefore, is "does having both Spell Resistance and life transference work as intended on a character with both make it overpowered", and I think the simple answer is no, because the combination of the two doesn't make the spell or the feature any more powerful, only removes the detriment to bring it back to level with all other characters.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Blake SteelBlake Steel

4,6591952

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Blake SteelBlake Steel

4,6591952

answered 3 hours ago

Blake SteelBlake Steel

4,6591952

answered 3 hours ago

Blake SteelBlake Steel

4,6591952