When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?Why become a...
Confused by notation of atomic number Z and mass number A on periodic table of elements
Counterexample: a pair of linearly ordered sets that are isomorphic to subsets of the other, but not isomorphic between them
Feels like I am getting dragged in office politics
Is creating your own "experiment" considered cheating during a physics exam?
What does "rf" mean in "rfkill"?
Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?
What are the spoon bit of a spoon and fork bit of a fork called?
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
What is the point of Germany's 299 "party seats" in the Bundestag?
Why do Computer Science majors learn Calculus?
Was it really necessary for the Lunar Module to have 2 stages?
Stateful vs non-stateful app
Normal subgroup of even order whose nontrivial elements form a single conjugacy class is abelian
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
How to figure out whether the data is sample data or population data apart from the client's information?
Sci-fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates
Single Colour Mastermind Problem
Help, my Death Star suffers from Kessler syndrome!
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?
gnu parallel how to use with ffmpeg
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Unexpected email from Yorkshire Bank
When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?
Why become a journal editor?How and why did the top journals become top journals?When did it become commonplace for data set providers to ask users to cite their paper(s)?Is this a tired phrase? — journal article titles that start with “Towards a theory of…”When and why did conferences pick up the habit of giving out conference bags to attendees?What is the point in publishing a paper in a journal rather than arXiv?When and how did journal publications start to have such an important role in evaluating researchers?From a historical perspective, when did impact factors become so important?What to do when journal comments to rewrite the article?Why did journal subscription prices increase by 25% between 2013 and 2017? (vs. 5% for US inflation)
In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]
Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]
I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.
Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?
[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf
[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986
journals academic-history
New contributor
|
show 3 more comments
In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]
Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]
I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.
Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?
[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf
[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986
journals academic-history
New contributor
3
Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.
– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago
2
@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.
– henning
2 hours ago
1
Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.
– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]
Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]
I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.
Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?
[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf
[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986
journals academic-history
New contributor
In 1926, the article titled “On a certain minimal problem” was published. Nobody could guess what it was about, from the title alone. [0]
Nowadays, one may expect something more descriptive, such as "Workspace Augmentation of Photon Impingement Through Impurities Removal" ;) [1]
I'd be interested when and why did the titles change, from the allusive style of the early 20th century, to the descriptive titles of today.
Was it a gradual change? Was it prompted by some notable event or influence? Was there a period when journal articles (or "letters" as it was then) did not have titles?
[0] https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-ismp/30_nesetril-nesetrilova.pdf
[1] https://twitter.com/anilalur/status/193242505599401986
journals academic-history
journals academic-history
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
user7610user7610
1145
1145
New contributor
New contributor
3
Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.
– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago
2
@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.
– henning
2 hours ago
1
Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.
– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3
Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.
– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago
2
@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.
– henning
2 hours ago
1
Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.
– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago
3
3
Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.
– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago
Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.
– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago
2
2
@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
1
MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
1
Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.
– henning
2 hours ago
Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.
– henning
2 hours ago
1
1
Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.
– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago
Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.
– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.
However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:
Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).
The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how
Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.
Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes
While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.
Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.
I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.
add a comment |
I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.
Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.
Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.
– user7610
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129814%2fwhen-and-why-did-journal-article-titles-become-descriptive-rather-than-creative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.
However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:
Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).
The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how
Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.
Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes
While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.
Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.
I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.
add a comment |
There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.
However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:
Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).
The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how
Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.
Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes
While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.
Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.
I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.
add a comment |
There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.
However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:
Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).
The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how
Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.
Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes
While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.
Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.
I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.
There's an interesting discussion of this in the introduction to Titles are "serious stuff": a historical study of academic titles by Salager-Meyer and Alcaraz Ariza (link). One point they argue is that titles (as well as abstracts) increasingly need to be more informative given the growing production of papers, in order for readers to make quick decisions on whether to read them or not. If this is the main factor, the information content would be expected to increase similarly to the size of the relevant academic community.
However, there's something I find much more interesting hidden in the introduction:
Other scholars have stressed that titles should be as informative as possible in order to facilitate the process of storing, searching and retrieving the information (Black 19622; Mitchell 1968; Tocatlian 1970; Feinberg 1973; Manten and Greenhalgh
1977; Hodges 1983; Diodato and Pearson 1985).
The paper by J. D. Black (IBM British Laboratories) is titled The Keyword: Its Use in Abstracting, Indexing and Retrieving Information discusses how
Librarians have been accustomed to using systems, schedules, thesauri, lists of headings, etc., to define and classify the literature which comes into their keeping. They use these same methods to retrieve and disseminate this literature. However, within recent years these methods have begun to show signs of strain, and in some cases breakdown, due to the tremendous increase in the volume and complexity of technical literature.
Specifically, Black showed that a 1960s era (punch card) computer can be used to extract keywords from a title to achieve a similar efficiency as manual classification, but for significantly cheaper cost, and allowing better scalability. Black also writes
While the index may be practical and usable, we still do not know precisely how efficient it is. In its present form, the efficiency is dependent on the author's choice of title. <...> before long the engineer, scientist, or mathematician will realize that if his title is not descriptive enough his paper will not be used as much as it might be.
Of course, if this automation of title processing is the main factor, one would expect to see a significant increase in the information content of titles starting some point in the late 50s, or early 60s. A 1970 paper by Jacques J. Tocatlian called Are titles for chemical papers becoming more informative? looked at precisely this, by comparing measures of information content between papers published in 1948, 1958, and 1968. (1958 being the year the KWIC index, or Key Word in Context, was introduced.) As Fig. 1 below shows, they found no significant difference between 1948 and 1958, but very different results for 1968. Here the measure A, for example, is defined as the total number of substantive or informative words. On the other hand, Fig. 2 shows that titles with few substantive words might have started being eliminated before the introduction of the KWIC index.
I don't know if there is similar evidence from other fields that the introduction of automated indexing was an important development, but it strikes me as likely that the same mechanisms would apply elsewhere too. So, long story short, a growing number of publications and the introduction of computers may have driven a large part of the push towards more descriptive and informative titles.
answered 1 hour ago
AnyonAnyon
8,93523345
8,93523345
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.
Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.
Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.
– user7610
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.
Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.
Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.
– user7610
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.
Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.
I have no evidence for this, but I'd guess that a significant factor is that at one time, people used to subscribe to particular journals and read, or at least skim, every article in every issue. So the title of your article wasn't necessarily a big factor in whether people read it or not.
Now that the volume of published research is much larger, and especially since the rise of computer-based searchable indexing of journals, readers will instead search for articles on a particular topic. In a listing of search results, the article's title is the first thing you see, and people use it to decide whether to go on to read the abstract or the paper itself. Thus, it is now more important to choose a descriptive title; if a researcher cannot tell from the title that it is (at least potentially) relevant to their interests, they are probably not going to read it at all.
answered 1 hour ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
109k36314412
109k36314412
Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.
– user7610
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.
– user7610
1 hour ago
Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.
– user7610
1 hour ago
Reasonable answer. The problem is, from the comments under the question, we don't even know whether there is such a trend, to be explained.
– user7610
1 hour ago
add a comment |
user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user7610 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129814%2fwhen-and-why-did-journal-article-titles-become-descriptive-rather-than-creative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Of course, two examples are not evidence of a trend. One can cherry-pick examples of descriptive and non-descriptive titles from either era.
– Nate Eldredge
3 hours ago
2
@user MR1694876 (2001c:26018). Rosłanowski, Andrzej; Shelah, Saharon. The yellow cake. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), no. 1,279–291.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
MR3787522. Garti, Shimon. Tiltan. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 356 (2018),no. 4, 351–359.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 hours ago
1
Social science titles have converged on a hybrid: Risse, T. (2000). "Let's Argue!": Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1-39. It seems creative when you see it first, but this motif has become completely conventional.
– henning
2 hours ago
1
Found them in a minute on Mathscinet: Azizi, Behnam; Doostie, Hossein; Certain numerical results in non-associative structures. Math. Sci. (Springer) 13 (2019), no. 1, 27–32. Yavuz, Emel; Owa, Shigeyoshi Notes on certain analytic functions. Turkish J. Math. 43 (2019), no. 1, 279–283. Choi, Junesang; Khan, Nabiullah; Usman, Talha; Aman, Mohd Certain unified polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 30 (2019), no. 1, 28–40. Tutaj, Edward Prime numbers with a certain extremal type property. Ann. Univ. Paedagog. Crac. Stud. Math. 17 (2018), 127–151.
– Federico Poloni
2 hours ago