A non-technological, repeating, visible object in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hoursA world...

Will a top journal at least read my introduction?

What are the spoon bit of a spoon and fork bit of a fork called?

How to back up a running remote server?

Confusion about capacitors

How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?

How to replace the "space symbol" (squat-u) in listings?

Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?

Why didn't this hurt this character as badly?

Was it really necessary for the Lunar Module to have 2 stages?

What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?

Binary Numbers Magic Trick

How to delegate to implementing class

Can solid acids and bases have pH values? If not, how are they classified as acids or bases?

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

Feels like I am getting dragged in office politics

What does "rf" mean in "rfkill"?

gnu parallel how to use with ffmpeg

Nginx subdirectory wordpress wp-login redirects to 404 not found

TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?

Mysql fixing root password

What is the point of Germany's 299 "party seats" in the Bundestag?

Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics

Is creating your own "experiment" considered cheating during a physics exam?

Counterexample: a pair of linearly ordered sets that are isomorphic to subsets of the other, but not isomorphic between them



A non-technological, repeating, visible object in the sky, holding its position in the sky for hours


A world with a moon orbiting much closer than oursMaking Mars biggerCould two stars of equivalent mass/size form a binary system and be different colors?What astronomical considerations are necessary for the planet in this model to possibly be Earth-like?How would a torus world (donut shaped) have to rotate in order to have a stable day / night cycle in all of its regions?Could I have an earth-like planet from which sun and moon would never be simultaneously visible?Describing a planet on a comet like orbitWhat is the maximum orbital time for my moon around my planet?What are the day and night fluctuations for a moon orbiting a planet the size of Jupiter?Designing a super-comfortable Earth analog













3












$begingroup$


Is this physically possible?



A non-technological phenomena visible in the same position of the sky, for 18 hours of a day using the other 6 to do whatever, rise and set, just be impossible to see, it doesn't matter.



What matters is the 18 hours of constant position in the sky, on a repeating cycle.



For an observer that is assumed to be watching from the same place, each cycle.



The viewer's planet is not Earth, just has enough similarities for humans to live on it.





If it is possible, how complex a system would I need to make such a thing happen, and how stable would that system be?



The cause can be in the atmosphere, as long as it cycles, and has the same visibility.



I'd like planets, but if that's not possible, then use whatever is possible.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.














  • $begingroup$
    Does it have to be visible from everywhere on earth at some point (or at least, all around some great circle of the earth's surface), or is having it only visible from one part of the globe acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime - Observer of single position. Can you help me think of how to add that into the title, while not going over 150 characters?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    What does "int the same position for 18 hours a day" mean? Is it in the same position with respect to the fixed stars? Or is it immobile, that is, it does not rise and does not set, and in this case what happens during the other 6 hours? Must it be visible in daylight? What does "in the sky" mean? In outer space, or is an object flying in the atmosphere acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is an interesting question, but so far all the comments are asking for clarifications which indicates to me you're not exactly clear what it is you're asking. I've voted to put your question on hold until you edit it. If you clarify before it actually gets closed, I'll happily retract the VTC!
    $endgroup$
    – elemtilas
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @elemtilas - How's this? ... My title's getting too long... Do you know any terminology to shorten it?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$


Is this physically possible?



A non-technological phenomena visible in the same position of the sky, for 18 hours of a day using the other 6 to do whatever, rise and set, just be impossible to see, it doesn't matter.



What matters is the 18 hours of constant position in the sky, on a repeating cycle.



For an observer that is assumed to be watching from the same place, each cycle.



The viewer's planet is not Earth, just has enough similarities for humans to live on it.





If it is possible, how complex a system would I need to make such a thing happen, and how stable would that system be?



The cause can be in the atmosphere, as long as it cycles, and has the same visibility.



I'd like planets, but if that's not possible, then use whatever is possible.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.














  • $begingroup$
    Does it have to be visible from everywhere on earth at some point (or at least, all around some great circle of the earth's surface), or is having it only visible from one part of the globe acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime - Observer of single position. Can you help me think of how to add that into the title, while not going over 150 characters?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    What does "int the same position for 18 hours a day" mean? Is it in the same position with respect to the fixed stars? Or is it immobile, that is, it does not rise and does not set, and in this case what happens during the other 6 hours? Must it be visible in daylight? What does "in the sky" mean? In outer space, or is an object flying in the atmosphere acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is an interesting question, but so far all the comments are asking for clarifications which indicates to me you're not exactly clear what it is you're asking. I've voted to put your question on hold until you edit it. If you clarify before it actually gets closed, I'll happily retract the VTC!
    $endgroup$
    – elemtilas
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @elemtilas - How's this? ... My title's getting too long... Do you know any terminology to shorten it?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    1 hour ago
















3












3








3





$begingroup$


Is this physically possible?



A non-technological phenomena visible in the same position of the sky, for 18 hours of a day using the other 6 to do whatever, rise and set, just be impossible to see, it doesn't matter.



What matters is the 18 hours of constant position in the sky, on a repeating cycle.



For an observer that is assumed to be watching from the same place, each cycle.



The viewer's planet is not Earth, just has enough similarities for humans to live on it.





If it is possible, how complex a system would I need to make such a thing happen, and how stable would that system be?



The cause can be in the atmosphere, as long as it cycles, and has the same visibility.



I'd like planets, but if that's not possible, then use whatever is possible.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is this physically possible?



A non-technological phenomena visible in the same position of the sky, for 18 hours of a day using the other 6 to do whatever, rise and set, just be impossible to see, it doesn't matter.



What matters is the 18 hours of constant position in the sky, on a repeating cycle.



For an observer that is assumed to be watching from the same place, each cycle.



The viewer's planet is not Earth, just has enough similarities for humans to live on it.





If it is possible, how complex a system would I need to make such a thing happen, and how stable would that system be?



The cause can be in the atmosphere, as long as it cycles, and has the same visibility.



I'd like planets, but if that's not possible, then use whatever is possible.







planets hard-science






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 39 mins ago







Malandy

















asked 2 hours ago









MalandyMalandy

2,06211243




2,06211243



This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.




This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.













  • $begingroup$
    Does it have to be visible from everywhere on earth at some point (or at least, all around some great circle of the earth's surface), or is having it only visible from one part of the globe acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime - Observer of single position. Can you help me think of how to add that into the title, while not going over 150 characters?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    What does "int the same position for 18 hours a day" mean? Is it in the same position with respect to the fixed stars? Or is it immobile, that is, it does not rise and does not set, and in this case what happens during the other 6 hours? Must it be visible in daylight? What does "in the sky" mean? In outer space, or is an object flying in the atmosphere acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is an interesting question, but so far all the comments are asking for clarifications which indicates to me you're not exactly clear what it is you're asking. I've voted to put your question on hold until you edit it. If you clarify before it actually gets closed, I'll happily retract the VTC!
    $endgroup$
    – elemtilas
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @elemtilas - How's this? ... My title's getting too long... Do you know any terminology to shorten it?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    1 hour ago




















  • $begingroup$
    Does it have to be visible from everywhere on earth at some point (or at least, all around some great circle of the earth's surface), or is having it only visible from one part of the globe acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @StarfishPrime - Observer of single position. Can you help me think of how to add that into the title, while not going over 150 characters?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    What does "int the same position for 18 hours a day" mean? Is it in the same position with respect to the fixed stars? Or is it immobile, that is, it does not rise and does not set, and in this case what happens during the other 6 hours? Must it be visible in daylight? What does "in the sky" mean? In outer space, or is an object flying in the atmosphere acceptable?
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    2 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This is an interesting question, but so far all the comments are asking for clarifications which indicates to me you're not exactly clear what it is you're asking. I've voted to put your question on hold until you edit it. If you clarify before it actually gets closed, I'll happily retract the VTC!
    $endgroup$
    – elemtilas
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @elemtilas - How's this? ... My title's getting too long... Do you know any terminology to shorten it?
    $endgroup$
    – Malandy
    1 hour ago


















$begingroup$
Does it have to be visible from everywhere on earth at some point (or at least, all around some great circle of the earth's surface), or is having it only visible from one part of the globe acceptable?
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
2 hours ago






$begingroup$
Does it have to be visible from everywhere on earth at some point (or at least, all around some great circle of the earth's surface), or is having it only visible from one part of the globe acceptable?
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
2 hours ago














$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime - Observer of single position. Can you help me think of how to add that into the title, while not going over 150 characters?
$endgroup$
– Malandy
2 hours ago






$begingroup$
@StarfishPrime - Observer of single position. Can you help me think of how to add that into the title, while not going over 150 characters?
$endgroup$
– Malandy
2 hours ago














$begingroup$
What does "int the same position for 18 hours a day" mean? Is it in the same position with respect to the fixed stars? Or is it immobile, that is, it does not rise and does not set, and in this case what happens during the other 6 hours? Must it be visible in daylight? What does "in the sky" mean? In outer space, or is an object flying in the atmosphere acceptable?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 hours ago






$begingroup$
What does "int the same position for 18 hours a day" mean? Is it in the same position with respect to the fixed stars? Or is it immobile, that is, it does not rise and does not set, and in this case what happens during the other 6 hours? Must it be visible in daylight? What does "in the sky" mean? In outer space, or is an object flying in the atmosphere acceptable?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 hours ago














$begingroup$
This is an interesting question, but so far all the comments are asking for clarifications which indicates to me you're not exactly clear what it is you're asking. I've voted to put your question on hold until you edit it. If you clarify before it actually gets closed, I'll happily retract the VTC!
$endgroup$
– elemtilas
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
This is an interesting question, but so far all the comments are asking for clarifications which indicates to me you're not exactly clear what it is you're asking. I've voted to put your question on hold until you edit it. If you clarify before it actually gets closed, I'll happily retract the VTC!
$endgroup$
– elemtilas
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@elemtilas - How's this? ... My title's getting too long... Do you know any terminology to shorten it?
$endgroup$
– Malandy
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
@elemtilas - How's this? ... My title's getting too long... Do you know any terminology to shorten it?
$endgroup$
– Malandy
1 hour ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It's physically possible.



Put a spherical object in a geostationary orbit, make it rotate about its own axis at a rate suited to your own visibility/non-visibility requirements, and make a portion of it have very low albedo.



Staying at a single point in the sky, the object will only be visible while the higher albedo portion is facing the planet and become invisible while the low albedo portion rotates into view.



It could technically happen by chance but would only be stable for as long as the orbit is stable, which really depends on your planetary system.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Difficult to imagine another possible answer. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
    $endgroup$
    – user10915156
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @user10915156 What's technological about a spherical object with different colors?
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, I read "put" and "make" as something happening inside the story. I see that you mean that the author might "put" an object into the world they are making up.
    $endgroup$
    – user10915156
    51 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ben It's entirely possible that the planet in question has no precession. I was thinking about a way for the orbital mechanics to work such that solar pressure/off-gassing corrected the orbit, but that's unlikely to add much more time without violating the other precepts of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel
    50 mins ago





















1












$begingroup$

You didn't say how far up in the sky you need your object and what type of object you want, so I suggest the plume of a volcano.



Some volcanos and geysers are quite regular in their eruptions. Your volcano will erupt not long after midnight every 24 hours and emit only a short burst of gaseous matter and fine dust-like particles that will drift upward in the still air and remain visible for 18 hours, until the evening wind scatters the cloud and it disappears.



If the eruption is just a short puff, the plume will be a small near-spherical cloud, as this one over Popocatepetl:



enter image description here



Etna even does smoke rings:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer










New contributor




user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    A geostationary satellite follows an orbit which keeps it over the same point on the Earth.



    https://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/how-to-see-and-photograph-geosynchronous-satellites/



    satellites



    The streaks are stars which are elongated by the rotation of the earth and the long exposure. The satellites are rotating with the earth and so they look like dots. I was surprised that the satellites this blogger photographed did not track out an analemma like the sun, but he says they stay put.




    Unlike the ISS and the many objects in low Earth object, geostationary
    satellites are visible all night long every night of the year.




    Satellites are technological objects but a thing can be in orbit and not be technological.



    If something were bright and in orbit you might be able to see it all the time. You could have it get bright alternately. With satellites these are called satellite flares.



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare




    Satellite flare, also known as satellite glint, is the visible
    phenomenon caused by the reflective surfaces of passing satellites
    (such as antennas, SAR or solar panels), reflecting sunlight toward
    the Earth below and appearing as a brief, bright "flare".




    The satellites that are famous for this apparently rotate so as to present their reflective surfaces. Something in orbit could be slowly rotating, and when the non reflective side was presented it would seem to disappear to the viewer on the ground.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Great minds... But you did include a picture, so I suspect you'll be the winner by votes.
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      1 hour ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145912%2fa-non-technological-repeating-visible-object-in-the-sky-holding-its-position%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    It's physically possible.



    Put a spherical object in a geostationary orbit, make it rotate about its own axis at a rate suited to your own visibility/non-visibility requirements, and make a portion of it have very low albedo.



    Staying at a single point in the sky, the object will only be visible while the higher albedo portion is facing the planet and become invisible while the low albedo portion rotates into view.



    It could technically happen by chance but would only be stable for as long as the orbit is stable, which really depends on your planetary system.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Difficult to imagine another possible answer. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @user10915156 What's technological about a spherical object with different colors?
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I'm sorry, I read "put" and "make" as something happening inside the story. I see that you mean that the author might "put" an object into the world they are making up.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      51 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ben It's entirely possible that the planet in question has no precession. I was thinking about a way for the orbital mechanics to work such that solar pressure/off-gassing corrected the orbit, but that's unlikely to add much more time without violating the other precepts of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      50 mins ago


















    5












    $begingroup$

    It's physically possible.



    Put a spherical object in a geostationary orbit, make it rotate about its own axis at a rate suited to your own visibility/non-visibility requirements, and make a portion of it have very low albedo.



    Staying at a single point in the sky, the object will only be visible while the higher albedo portion is facing the planet and become invisible while the low albedo portion rotates into view.



    It could technically happen by chance but would only be stable for as long as the orbit is stable, which really depends on your planetary system.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Difficult to imagine another possible answer. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @user10915156 What's technological about a spherical object with different colors?
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I'm sorry, I read "put" and "make" as something happening inside the story. I see that you mean that the author might "put" an object into the world they are making up.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      51 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ben It's entirely possible that the planet in question has no precession. I was thinking about a way for the orbital mechanics to work such that solar pressure/off-gassing corrected the orbit, but that's unlikely to add much more time without violating the other precepts of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      50 mins ago
















    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    It's physically possible.



    Put a spherical object in a geostationary orbit, make it rotate about its own axis at a rate suited to your own visibility/non-visibility requirements, and make a portion of it have very low albedo.



    Staying at a single point in the sky, the object will only be visible while the higher albedo portion is facing the planet and become invisible while the low albedo portion rotates into view.



    It could technically happen by chance but would only be stable for as long as the orbit is stable, which really depends on your planetary system.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    It's physically possible.



    Put a spherical object in a geostationary orbit, make it rotate about its own axis at a rate suited to your own visibility/non-visibility requirements, and make a portion of it have very low albedo.



    Staying at a single point in the sky, the object will only be visible while the higher albedo portion is facing the planet and become invisible while the low albedo portion rotates into view.



    It could technically happen by chance but would only be stable for as long as the orbit is stable, which really depends on your planetary system.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    SamuelSamuel

    44.8k8126220




    44.8k8126220








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Difficult to imagine another possible answer. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @user10915156 What's technological about a spherical object with different colors?
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I'm sorry, I read "put" and "make" as something happening inside the story. I see that you mean that the author might "put" an object into the world they are making up.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      51 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ben It's entirely possible that the planet in question has no precession. I was thinking about a way for the orbital mechanics to work such that solar pressure/off-gassing corrected the orbit, but that's unlikely to add much more time without violating the other precepts of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      50 mins ago
















    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Difficult to imagine another possible answer. +1
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @user10915156 What's technological about a spherical object with different colors?
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      1 hour ago








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I'm sorry, I read "put" and "make" as something happening inside the story. I see that you mean that the author might "put" an object into the world they are making up.
      $endgroup$
      – user10915156
      51 mins ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ben It's entirely possible that the planet in question has no precession. I was thinking about a way for the orbital mechanics to work such that solar pressure/off-gassing corrected the orbit, but that's unlikely to add much more time without violating the other precepts of the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Samuel
      50 mins ago










    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Difficult to imagine another possible answer. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Difficult to imagine another possible answer. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
    $endgroup$
    – user10915156
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
    $endgroup$
    – user10915156
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    @user10915156 What's technological about a spherical object with different colors?
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel
    1 hour ago






    $begingroup$
    @user10915156 What's technological about a spherical object with different colors?
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel
    1 hour ago






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, I read "put" and "make" as something happening inside the story. I see that you mean that the author might "put" an object into the world they are making up.
    $endgroup$
    – user10915156
    51 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, I read "put" and "make" as something happening inside the story. I see that you mean that the author might "put" an object into the world they are making up.
    $endgroup$
    – user10915156
    51 mins ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @ben It's entirely possible that the planet in question has no precession. I was thinking about a way for the orbital mechanics to work such that solar pressure/off-gassing corrected the orbit, but that's unlikely to add much more time without violating the other precepts of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel
    50 mins ago






    $begingroup$
    @ben It's entirely possible that the planet in question has no precession. I was thinking about a way for the orbital mechanics to work such that solar pressure/off-gassing corrected the orbit, but that's unlikely to add much more time without violating the other precepts of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel
    50 mins ago













    1












    $begingroup$

    You didn't say how far up in the sky you need your object and what type of object you want, so I suggest the plume of a volcano.



    Some volcanos and geysers are quite regular in their eruptions. Your volcano will erupt not long after midnight every 24 hours and emit only a short burst of gaseous matter and fine dust-like particles that will drift upward in the still air and remain visible for 18 hours, until the evening wind scatters the cloud and it disappears.



    If the eruption is just a short puff, the plume will be a small near-spherical cloud, as this one over Popocatepetl:



    enter image description here



    Etna even does smoke rings:



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      You didn't say how far up in the sky you need your object and what type of object you want, so I suggest the plume of a volcano.



      Some volcanos and geysers are quite regular in their eruptions. Your volcano will erupt not long after midnight every 24 hours and emit only a short burst of gaseous matter and fine dust-like particles that will drift upward in the still air and remain visible for 18 hours, until the evening wind scatters the cloud and it disappears.



      If the eruption is just a short puff, the plume will be a small near-spherical cloud, as this one over Popocatepetl:



      enter image description here



      Etna even does smoke rings:



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You didn't say how far up in the sky you need your object and what type of object you want, so I suggest the plume of a volcano.



        Some volcanos and geysers are quite regular in their eruptions. Your volcano will erupt not long after midnight every 24 hours and emit only a short burst of gaseous matter and fine dust-like particles that will drift upward in the still air and remain visible for 18 hours, until the evening wind scatters the cloud and it disappears.



        If the eruption is just a short puff, the plume will be a small near-spherical cloud, as this one over Popocatepetl:



        enter image description here



        Etna even does smoke rings:



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        You didn't say how far up in the sky you need your object and what type of object you want, so I suggest the plume of a volcano.



        Some volcanos and geysers are quite regular in their eruptions. Your volcano will erupt not long after midnight every 24 hours and emit only a short burst of gaseous matter and fine dust-like particles that will drift upward in the still air and remain visible for 18 hours, until the evening wind scatters the cloud and it disappears.



        If the eruption is just a short puff, the plume will be a small near-spherical cloud, as this one over Popocatepetl:



        enter image description here



        Etna even does smoke rings:



        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 47 mins ago





















        New contributor




        user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 56 mins ago









        user10915156user10915156

        2813




        2813




        New contributor




        user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        user10915156 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























            0












            $begingroup$

            A geostationary satellite follows an orbit which keeps it over the same point on the Earth.



            https://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/how-to-see-and-photograph-geosynchronous-satellites/



            satellites



            The streaks are stars which are elongated by the rotation of the earth and the long exposure. The satellites are rotating with the earth and so they look like dots. I was surprised that the satellites this blogger photographed did not track out an analemma like the sun, but he says they stay put.




            Unlike the ISS and the many objects in low Earth object, geostationary
            satellites are visible all night long every night of the year.




            Satellites are technological objects but a thing can be in orbit and not be technological.



            If something were bright and in orbit you might be able to see it all the time. You could have it get bright alternately. With satellites these are called satellite flares.



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare




            Satellite flare, also known as satellite glint, is the visible
            phenomenon caused by the reflective surfaces of passing satellites
            (such as antennas, SAR or solar panels), reflecting sunlight toward
            the Earth below and appearing as a brief, bright "flare".




            The satellites that are famous for this apparently rotate so as to present their reflective surfaces. Something in orbit could be slowly rotating, and when the non reflective side was presented it would seem to disappear to the viewer on the ground.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Great minds... But you did include a picture, so I suspect you'll be the winner by votes.
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
              $endgroup$
              – user10915156
              1 hour ago
















            0












            $begingroup$

            A geostationary satellite follows an orbit which keeps it over the same point on the Earth.



            https://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/how-to-see-and-photograph-geosynchronous-satellites/



            satellites



            The streaks are stars which are elongated by the rotation of the earth and the long exposure. The satellites are rotating with the earth and so they look like dots. I was surprised that the satellites this blogger photographed did not track out an analemma like the sun, but he says they stay put.




            Unlike the ISS and the many objects in low Earth object, geostationary
            satellites are visible all night long every night of the year.




            Satellites are technological objects but a thing can be in orbit and not be technological.



            If something were bright and in orbit you might be able to see it all the time. You could have it get bright alternately. With satellites these are called satellite flares.



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare




            Satellite flare, also known as satellite glint, is the visible
            phenomenon caused by the reflective surfaces of passing satellites
            (such as antennas, SAR or solar panels), reflecting sunlight toward
            the Earth below and appearing as a brief, bright "flare".




            The satellites that are famous for this apparently rotate so as to present their reflective surfaces. Something in orbit could be slowly rotating, and when the non reflective side was presented it would seem to disappear to the viewer on the ground.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Great minds... But you did include a picture, so I suspect you'll be the winner by votes.
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
              $endgroup$
              – user10915156
              1 hour ago














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            A geostationary satellite follows an orbit which keeps it over the same point on the Earth.



            https://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/how-to-see-and-photograph-geosynchronous-satellites/



            satellites



            The streaks are stars which are elongated by the rotation of the earth and the long exposure. The satellites are rotating with the earth and so they look like dots. I was surprised that the satellites this blogger photographed did not track out an analemma like the sun, but he says they stay put.




            Unlike the ISS and the many objects in low Earth object, geostationary
            satellites are visible all night long every night of the year.




            Satellites are technological objects but a thing can be in orbit and not be technological.



            If something were bright and in orbit you might be able to see it all the time. You could have it get bright alternately. With satellites these are called satellite flares.



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare




            Satellite flare, also known as satellite glint, is the visible
            phenomenon caused by the reflective surfaces of passing satellites
            (such as antennas, SAR or solar panels), reflecting sunlight toward
            the Earth below and appearing as a brief, bright "flare".




            The satellites that are famous for this apparently rotate so as to present their reflective surfaces. Something in orbit could be slowly rotating, and when the non reflective side was presented it would seem to disappear to the viewer on the ground.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            A geostationary satellite follows an orbit which keeps it over the same point on the Earth.



            https://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/how-to-see-and-photograph-geosynchronous-satellites/



            satellites



            The streaks are stars which are elongated by the rotation of the earth and the long exposure. The satellites are rotating with the earth and so they look like dots. I was surprised that the satellites this blogger photographed did not track out an analemma like the sun, but he says they stay put.




            Unlike the ISS and the many objects in low Earth object, geostationary
            satellites are visible all night long every night of the year.




            Satellites are technological objects but a thing can be in orbit and not be technological.



            If something were bright and in orbit you might be able to see it all the time. You could have it get bright alternately. With satellites these are called satellite flares.



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare




            Satellite flare, also known as satellite glint, is the visible
            phenomenon caused by the reflective surfaces of passing satellites
            (such as antennas, SAR or solar panels), reflecting sunlight toward
            the Earth below and appearing as a brief, bright "flare".




            The satellites that are famous for this apparently rotate so as to present their reflective surfaces. Something in orbit could be slowly rotating, and when the non reflective side was presented it would seem to disappear to the viewer on the ground.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            WillkWillk

            120k28225499




            120k28225499












            • $begingroup$
              Great minds... But you did include a picture, so I suspect you'll be the winner by votes.
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
              $endgroup$
              – user10915156
              1 hour ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Great minds... But you did include a picture, so I suspect you'll be the winner by votes.
              $endgroup$
              – Samuel
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
              $endgroup$
              – user10915156
              1 hour ago
















            $begingroup$
            Great minds... But you did include a picture, so I suspect you'll be the winner by votes.
            $endgroup$
            – Samuel
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            Great minds... But you did include a picture, so I suspect you'll be the winner by votes.
            $endgroup$
            – Samuel
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
            $endgroup$
            – user10915156
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            I believe they said "non-technological" in their question.
            $endgroup$
            – user10915156
            1 hour ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145912%2fa-non-technological-repeating-visible-object-in-the-sky-holding-its-position%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            “%fieldName is a required field.”, in Magento2 REST API Call for GET Method Type The Next...

            How to change City field to a dropdown in Checkout step Magento 2Magento 2 : How to change UI field(s)...

            變成蝙蝠會怎樣? 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Thomas Nagel, "What is it like to be a...