How does a swashbuckler fight with two weapons and safely dart away?Are you still two-weapon fighting if...
Do generators produce a fixed load?
What does "rf" mean in "rfkill"?
Will a top journal at least read my introduction?
An uncommon variant of 写
Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?
Can fracking help reduce CO2?
Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?
Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control?
Is it possible to dynamically set properties of an `Object` using Apex?
How can I place the product on a social media post better?
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
Why do Computer Science majors learn Calculus?
Stop and Take a Breath!
How to back up a running remote server?
Python: pythonic way to find last position in string that does not match regex
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?
Please, smoke with good manners
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
How does a swashbuckler fight with two weapons and safely dart away?
What word means to make something obsolete?
Why do Ichisongas hate elephants and hippos?
How to figure out whether the data is sample data or population data apart from the client's information?
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
How does a swashbuckler fight with two weapons and safely dart away?
Are you still two-weapon fighting if you've thrown one of your two weapons and are no longer holding it?How does the Dual Wielder feat interact with versatile weapons?How does Mending interact with corroded weapons?How does the disengage action work against a monster with the reactive heads ability, such as a hydra?Using shields with versatile/two-handed weapons?Does a Ranger with dual daggers and Two-Weapon Fighting make four attacks at full strength plus Hunter's Mark at level 5?How *exactly* does Dispel Magic work with multiple effects?How Does Assassinate Work when Reinforcing a Fight that has already started?How does the Web spell burn away?How to build a rogue unchained to be able to fight with 2 blade boots and 2 daggers?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
The description for Swashbuckler says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue swashbuckler
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description for Swashbuckler says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue swashbuckler
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description for Swashbuckler says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue swashbuckler
$endgroup$
The description for Swashbuckler says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue swashbuckler
dnd-5e rogue swashbuckler
asked 2 hours ago
JackJack
10.5k44198
10.5k44198
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-fight-with-two-weapons-and-safely-dart-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
$endgroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
SeidrSeidr
2189
2189
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
answered 2 hours ago
CarcerCarcer
27.5k583145
27.5k583145
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-fight-with-two-weapons-and-safely-dart-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Jeez, not sure why the -1. All the world's a critic....
$endgroup$
– Jack
2 hours ago