Overlay of two functions leaves gapsCannot Plot FunctionStability analysis of transcendental equation...

Which big number is bigger?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

Why does Mind Blank stop the Feeblemind spell?

How can I practically buy stocks?

How can I print the prosodic symbols in LaTeX?

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

What is the optimal strategy for the Dictionary Game?

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

What causes platform events to fail to be published and should I cater for failed platform event creations?

'It addicted me, with one taste.' Can 'addict' be used transitively?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

Overlay of two functions leaves gaps

a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat

How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish

Checks user level and limit the data before saving it to mongoDB

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

Can't get 5V 3A DC constant

Elements that can bond to themselves?

'regex' and 'name' directives in find

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?



Overlay of two functions leaves gaps


Cannot Plot FunctionStability analysis of transcendental equation (stability crossing curves)Implicitly defined compact complicated surfaceHow to invert an Elliptic function where the elliptic nome is a function of an independent variable?Visualizing the primes with the Riemann Zeta functionGroup delay of a transfer functionHow would one go about plotting this parameterized curve using numerical resources (analitically it's too hard)?How to study the behavior of this series in Mathematica?What am I doing wrong when trying to plot this function?ComplexPlot3D and essential singularities













2












$begingroup$


I have a function defined as:



$rho_{m}left(epsilon,mright)=left[-2epsilon rpmleft(4epsilon^{2}r^{2}+mlambda r^{3}right)^{frac{1}{2}}right]^{frac{1}{2}}$



I want to plot it for some $min mathbb{Z}$, so I wrote this code:



Clear[r,[Lambda]];
[Lambda]=685*10^-9;
r=25*10^-3;
[Rho]1[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r+(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
[Rho]2[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r-(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
M=Range[-5,5,1];
p1=Show[Plot[[Rho]1[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
p2=Show[Plot[[Rho]2[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
Show[{p1,p2}]


Which outputs:



enter image description here



However, there are some tiny gaps where the two functiosn meet, but I was expecting them to be continuous. How can I fix that?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Adding the option PlotPoints->1000 to both your Plots will make those gaps much less visible.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think that the problem may be that the functions become imaginary at $epsilon = 0$. Plot doesn't plot anything at all when the value is imaginary. When it happens precisely at the point where they're supposed to meet I guess it becomes a numerical issue, hence why PlotPoints may help.
    $endgroup$
    – C. E.
    1 hour ago
















2












$begingroup$


I have a function defined as:



$rho_{m}left(epsilon,mright)=left[-2epsilon rpmleft(4epsilon^{2}r^{2}+mlambda r^{3}right)^{frac{1}{2}}right]^{frac{1}{2}}$



I want to plot it for some $min mathbb{Z}$, so I wrote this code:



Clear[r,[Lambda]];
[Lambda]=685*10^-9;
r=25*10^-3;
[Rho]1[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r+(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
[Rho]2[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r-(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
M=Range[-5,5,1];
p1=Show[Plot[[Rho]1[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
p2=Show[Plot[[Rho]2[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
Show[{p1,p2}]


Which outputs:



enter image description here



However, there are some tiny gaps where the two functiosn meet, but I was expecting them to be continuous. How can I fix that?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Adding the option PlotPoints->1000 to both your Plots will make those gaps much less visible.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think that the problem may be that the functions become imaginary at $epsilon = 0$. Plot doesn't plot anything at all when the value is imaginary. When it happens precisely at the point where they're supposed to meet I guess it becomes a numerical issue, hence why PlotPoints may help.
    $endgroup$
    – C. E.
    1 hour ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have a function defined as:



$rho_{m}left(epsilon,mright)=left[-2epsilon rpmleft(4epsilon^{2}r^{2}+mlambda r^{3}right)^{frac{1}{2}}right]^{frac{1}{2}}$



I want to plot it for some $min mathbb{Z}$, so I wrote this code:



Clear[r,[Lambda]];
[Lambda]=685*10^-9;
r=25*10^-3;
[Rho]1[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r+(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
[Rho]2[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r-(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
M=Range[-5,5,1];
p1=Show[Plot[[Rho]1[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
p2=Show[Plot[[Rho]2[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
Show[{p1,p2}]


Which outputs:



enter image description here



However, there are some tiny gaps where the two functiosn meet, but I was expecting them to be continuous. How can I fix that?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a function defined as:



$rho_{m}left(epsilon,mright)=left[-2epsilon rpmleft(4epsilon^{2}r^{2}+mlambda r^{3}right)^{frac{1}{2}}right]^{frac{1}{2}}$



I want to plot it for some $min mathbb{Z}$, so I wrote this code:



Clear[r,[Lambda]];
[Lambda]=685*10^-9;
r=25*10^-3;
[Rho]1[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r+(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
[Rho]2[[Epsilon]_,m_]=(-2*[Epsilon]*r-(4*[Epsilon]^2*r^2+m*[Lambda]*r^3)^(1/2))^(1/2);
M=Range[-5,5,1];
p1=Show[Plot[[Rho]1[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
p2=Show[Plot[[Rho]2[[Epsilon]*10^-3,#]*10^3, {[Epsilon],-0.5,0.5}, PlotRange -> {{-0.5,0.5},{0, 5}},AxesOrigin->{-0.5,0},PlotTheme->"Monochrome"] & /@ M];
Show[{p1,p2}]


Which outputs:



enter image description here



However, there are some tiny gaps where the two functiosn meet, but I was expecting them to be continuous. How can I fix that?







plotting graphics






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









RodrigoRodrigo

1056




1056












  • $begingroup$
    Adding the option PlotPoints->1000 to both your Plots will make those gaps much less visible.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think that the problem may be that the functions become imaginary at $epsilon = 0$. Plot doesn't plot anything at all when the value is imaginary. When it happens precisely at the point where they're supposed to meet I guess it becomes a numerical issue, hence why PlotPoints may help.
    $endgroup$
    – C. E.
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Adding the option PlotPoints->1000 to both your Plots will make those gaps much less visible.
    $endgroup$
    – Bill
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think that the problem may be that the functions become imaginary at $epsilon = 0$. Plot doesn't plot anything at all when the value is imaginary. When it happens precisely at the point where they're supposed to meet I guess it becomes a numerical issue, hence why PlotPoints may help.
    $endgroup$
    – C. E.
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
Adding the option PlotPoints->1000 to both your Plots will make those gaps much less visible.
$endgroup$
– Bill
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Adding the option PlotPoints->1000 to both your Plots will make those gaps much less visible.
$endgroup$
– Bill
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
I think that the problem may be that the functions become imaginary at $epsilon = 0$. Plot doesn't plot anything at all when the value is imaginary. When it happens precisely at the point where they're supposed to meet I guess it becomes a numerical issue, hence why PlotPoints may help.
$endgroup$
– C. E.
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I think that the problem may be that the functions become imaginary at $epsilon = 0$. Plot doesn't plot anything at all when the value is imaginary. When it happens precisely at the point where they're supposed to meet I guess it becomes a numerical issue, hence why PlotPoints may help.
$endgroup$
– C. E.
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

If you turn the equation around and plot $epsilon$ as a function of $rho$, then there are no gaps and no branches:



λ = 685*10^-9;
r = 25*10^-3;
ParametricPlot[Table[10^3 {(m r^3 λ - ρ^4)/(4 r ρ^2), ρ}, {m, -5, 5}],
{ρ, 0, 5*10^-3}, AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197133%2foverlay-of-two-functions-leaves-gaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    If you turn the equation around and plot $epsilon$ as a function of $rho$, then there are no gaps and no branches:



    λ = 685*10^-9;
    r = 25*10^-3;
    ParametricPlot[Table[10^3 {(m r^3 λ - ρ^4)/(4 r ρ^2), ρ}, {m, -5, 5}],
    {ρ, 0, 5*10^-3}, AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio]


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      If you turn the equation around and plot $epsilon$ as a function of $rho$, then there are no gaps and no branches:



      λ = 685*10^-9;
      r = 25*10^-3;
      ParametricPlot[Table[10^3 {(m r^3 λ - ρ^4)/(4 r ρ^2), ρ}, {m, -5, 5}],
      {ρ, 0, 5*10^-3}, AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio]


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        If you turn the equation around and plot $epsilon$ as a function of $rho$, then there are no gaps and no branches:



        λ = 685*10^-9;
        r = 25*10^-3;
        ParametricPlot[Table[10^3 {(m r^3 λ - ρ^4)/(4 r ρ^2), ρ}, {m, -5, 5}],
        {ρ, 0, 5*10^-3}, AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio]


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If you turn the equation around and plot $epsilon$ as a function of $rho$, then there are no gaps and no branches:



        λ = 685*10^-9;
        r = 25*10^-3;
        ParametricPlot[Table[10^3 {(m r^3 λ - ρ^4)/(4 r ρ^2), ρ}, {m, -5, 5}],
        {ρ, 0, 5*10^-3}, AspectRatio -> 1/GoldenRatio]


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        RomanRoman

        6,26111132




        6,26111132






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197133%2foverlay-of-two-functions-leaves-gaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            迭戈·戈丁...

            A phrase ”follow into" in a context The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are...

            1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer...