How to define new environment, using proof-environmentntheorem with the [amsthm] option ignores styling of a...
Does my logo design convey the right feelings for a University Student's Council?
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
Knowing when to use pictures over words
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?
What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?
Issues with new Macs: hardware makes them difficult to use … what options might be available in the future?
How to join 2 tables in mysql but with different values in one of the tables
En Passant For Beginners
How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?
Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?
What is the time complexity of enqueue and dequeue of a queue implemented with a singly linked list?
How to remove trailing forward slash
How did the original light saber work?
Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?
How can animals be objects of ethics without being subjects as well?
Does Windows 10's telemetry include sending *.doc files if Word crashed?
How to deal with an incendiary email that was recalled
Eww, those bytes are gross
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?
A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?
Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?
What is this metal M-shaped device for?
How to define new environment, using proof-environment
ntheorem with the [amsthm] option ignores styling of a theorem environmentIncluding end mark in definitions and examples (using amsthm)Skipping line after “Proof” in proof environmentUsing docmute to import separate document as part of proof?How can I create a customized environment?ntheorem vs. amsthmDuplicating the amsthm proof environmentHow to make proof environment without amsthm?QED symbol after statements without proofNew theorem environment with manual theorem number
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
add a comment |
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
The text "Proof" is provided byproofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.
– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
theorems amsthm
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
edited 51 mins ago
Bernard
172k775203
172k775203
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
1255
The text "Proof" is provided byproofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.
– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The text "Proof" is provided byproofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.
– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
The text "Proof" is provided by
proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
The text "Proof" is provided by
proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
49 mins ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
46 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477475%2fhow-to-define-new-environment-using-proof-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
49 mins ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
46 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
36 mins ago
add a comment |
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
49 mins ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
46 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
36 mins ago
add a comment |
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
edited 57 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
723k8819173221
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
49 mins ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
46 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
36 mins ago
add a comment |
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
49 mins ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
46 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
36 mins ago
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
49 mins ago
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
49 mins ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)
sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.– egreg
46 mins ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)
sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.– egreg
46 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
36 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477475%2fhow-to-define-new-environment-using-proof-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The text "Proof" is provided by
proofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.– barbara beeton
1 hour ago