Gsyfuy

Can polymorphing monsters spam their ability to effectively give themselves a massive health pool?

"On one hand" vs "on the one hand."

Is it safe to try charging my laptop with a USB-C PD charger that has less wattage than recommended?

How does Internet communication work on a coaxial cable?

Does the "particle exchange" operator have any validity?

Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits

How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?

How did the original light saber work?

How to remove trailing forward slash

What does "at rest" mean involving data encryption?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Getting a UK passport renewed when you have dual nationality and a different name in your second country?

Number of FLOP (Floating Point Operations) for exponentiation

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

Does Windows 10's telemetry include sending *.doc files if Word crashed?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?

Eww, those bytes are gross

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

How to prove teleportation does not violate non-cloning theorem?

How can I improve my fireworks photography?

What do you call a fact that doesn't match the settings?

How experienced do I need to be to go on a photography workshop?

Why did Bush enact a completely different foreign policy to that which he espoused during the 2000 Presidential election campaign?

What evidence did the Bush administration have that Iraq stored WMD?Is there a video online that shows the congressional session which confirms the US Presidential Election?Did the candidacy of Ross Perot swing the 1992 presidential election?Is there a website that breaks down the 2012 presidential election results by congressional district?Have there been precedents of presidential campaigns communicating with foreign governments during the election campaign?During the Obama administration, did the US interfere with foreign elections?Why did US armed forces retreat from the Philippines completely?Does a Presidential Pardon apply to other crimes which are uncovered during the investigation of the pardoned crime?Why don't US presidential candidates get thrown into jail by their opponent during election?What did the 2012 Obama campaign election app ask of its users vs. what did it actually do?

3

1

I was watching a campaign video from 2000, in it Bush clearly thinks the USA's position as the 'world police' or that their foreign intervention strategy, especially ones that instil virtues on other sovereign states, are ill advised.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsvf1HU0KHM

How is this reconciled with many choices he made as president, namely the Iraq war? Why did he change his tune?

united-states foreign-policy george-w-bush

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Martin Schröder

1,0371931

asked 3 hours ago

Name NamersonName Namerson

182

New contributor

Name Namerson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Just checking - you aren’t a 9/11 truther are you?
  
  – Andrew Grimm
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not at all, I was just checking if there was a more nuanced view. I obviously think 9/11 was important, just seeing if there were other factors at play. Perhaps I should have asked how 9/11 impacted Bush's foreign policy.
  
  – Name Namerson
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

1

I was watching a campaign video from 2000, in it Bush clearly thinks the USA's position as the 'world police' or that their foreign intervention strategy, especially ones that instil virtues on other sovereign states, are ill advised.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsvf1HU0KHM

How is this reconciled with many choices he made as president, namely the Iraq war? Why did he change his tune?

united-states foreign-policy george-w-bush

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Martin Schröder

1,0371931

asked 3 hours ago

Name NamersonName Namerson

182

New contributor

Name Namerson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Just checking - you aren’t a 9/11 truther are you?
  
  – Andrew Grimm
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not at all, I was just checking if there was a more nuanced view. I obviously think 9/11 was important, just seeing if there were other factors at play. Perhaps I should have asked how 9/11 impacted Bush's foreign policy.
  
  – Name Namerson
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I was watching a campaign video from 2000, in it Bush clearly thinks the USA's position as the 'world police' or that their foreign intervention strategy, especially ones that instil virtues on other sovereign states, are ill advised.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsvf1HU0KHM

How is this reconciled with many choices he made as president, namely the Iraq war? Why did he change his tune?

united-states foreign-policy george-w-bush

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Martin Schröder

1,0371931

asked 3 hours ago

Name NamersonName Namerson

182

New contributor

Name Namerson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Martin Schröder

1,0371931

asked 3 hours ago

Name NamersonName Namerson

182

New contributor

Name Namerson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

Martin Schröder

1,0371931

asked 3 hours ago

Name NamersonName Namerson

182

New contributor

Name Namerson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 2 hours ago

Martin Schröder

1,0371931

edited 2 hours ago

Martin Schröder

1,0371931

asked 3 hours ago

Name NamersonName Namerson

182

New contributor

Name Namerson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 3 hours ago

Name NamersonName Namerson

182

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

4

On September 11th, 2001, terrorists from the Al Queda group flew passenger aircraft into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.

This changed Bush's worldview.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

James KJames K

35k8103147

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Fair enough, do you think anything since (after) the Iraq war conforms to his policy during the 2000 campaign, or do you think 9/11 changed everything?
  
  – Name Namerson
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This answer would make more sense if you replace "terrorist" with "jihadist". You could compare this to the US attitude to WWII after Pearl Harbor: before the US was attacked, a good many people didn't want to get involved in the affairs of other countries. It's not that the attack changed that view, so much as it made it specifically an affair of the US.
  
  – jamesqf
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

Sept. 11 changed everything. It demonstrated with the utmost clarity that even if the US were to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the rest of the world, the rest of the world was not going to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the US.

The first change was in Afghanistan. The Taliban had largely ruled Afghanistan since about 1996. The US certainly didn't like them, but also didn't view them as America's problem.

On September 11, the NSA and German intelligence both intercepted communications pointing to Bin Laden. Some hijackers were identified while the planes were still in the air. Mohamed Atta's luggage, which did not make his flight, was also helpful.

Already on Semptember 12, many in the US suspected that he was to blame.

It also helped that the hijackers purchased their tickets using their real names. By September 14, the FBI released the names of the hijackers.

Also on Sept. 14, Congress passed a law authorizing the military to attack anyone associated with terrorists. The vote was 98-0 in the Senate and 420-1 in the House.

On Sept. 21, the Taliban refused a US demand to hand over Bin Laden. For Bush, that was plenty of reason to go to war. The US decision to overthrow the Taliban was supported by nearly everyone in the US.

Then there was Iraq. Although he was not involved in planning them, Saddam Hussein originally praised the attacks. Saddam had used chemical weapons during the war against Iran, and he was refusing to cooperate with inspectors who were supposed to verify that he had given them up. Some people reasoned, wrongly, that if he didn't have anything to hide, he would be cooperating with the inspectors. And Saddam had a history of supporting terrorists, for example paying $25,000 to the family of every Palestinian suicide bomber.

Based on this, Bush made a case for war against Saddam. That was hotly debated at the time. Most Republicans were in favor. Some Democrats, such as Hillary Clinton, were also in favor, while others, such as Barack Obama, were opposed.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

William JockuschWilliam Jockusch

1,7891314

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Name Namerson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39174%2fwhy-did-bush-enact-a-completely-different-foreign-policy-to-that-which-he-espous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

4

On September 11th, 2001, terrorists from the Al Queda group flew passenger aircraft into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.

This changed Bush's worldview.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

James KJames K

35k8103147

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Fair enough, do you think anything since (after) the Iraq war conforms to his policy during the 2000 campaign, or do you think 9/11 changed everything?
  
  – Name Namerson
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This answer would make more sense if you replace "terrorist" with "jihadist". You could compare this to the US attitude to WWII after Pearl Harbor: before the US was attacked, a good many people didn't want to get involved in the affairs of other countries. It's not that the attack changed that view, so much as it made it specifically an affair of the US.
  
  – jamesqf
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

On September 11th, 2001, terrorists from the Al Queda group flew passenger aircraft into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.

This changed Bush's worldview.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

James KJames K

35k8103147

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Fair enough, do you think anything since (after) the Iraq war conforms to his policy during the 2000 campaign, or do you think 9/11 changed everything?
  
  – Name Namerson
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This answer would make more sense if you replace "terrorist" with "jihadist". You could compare this to the US attitude to WWII after Pearl Harbor: before the US was attacked, a good many people didn't want to get involved in the affairs of other countries. It's not that the attack changed that view, so much as it made it specifically an affair of the US.
  
  – jamesqf
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

On September 11th, 2001, terrorists from the Al Queda group flew passenger aircraft into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.

This changed Bush's worldview.

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

James KJames K

35k8103147

share|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

James KJames K

35k8103147

answered 2 hours ago

James KJames K

35k8103147

answered 2 hours ago

James KJames K

35k8103147

1

Sept. 11 changed everything. It demonstrated with the utmost clarity that even if the US were to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the rest of the world, the rest of the world was not going to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the US.

The first change was in Afghanistan. The Taliban had largely ruled Afghanistan since about 1996. The US certainly didn't like them, but also didn't view them as America's problem.

On September 11, the NSA and German intelligence both intercepted communications pointing to Bin Laden. Some hijackers were identified while the planes were still in the air. Mohamed Atta's luggage, which did not make his flight, was also helpful.

Already on Semptember 12, many in the US suspected that he was to blame.

It also helped that the hijackers purchased their tickets using their real names. By September 14, the FBI released the names of the hijackers.

Also on Sept. 14, Congress passed a law authorizing the military to attack anyone associated with terrorists. The vote was 98-0 in the Senate and 420-1 in the House.

On Sept. 21, the Taliban refused a US demand to hand over Bin Laden. For Bush, that was plenty of reason to go to war. The US decision to overthrow the Taliban was supported by nearly everyone in the US.

Then there was Iraq. Although he was not involved in planning them, Saddam Hussein originally praised the attacks. Saddam had used chemical weapons during the war against Iran, and he was refusing to cooperate with inspectors who were supposed to verify that he had given them up. Some people reasoned, wrongly, that if he didn't have anything to hide, he would be cooperating with the inspectors. And Saddam had a history of supporting terrorists, for example paying $25,000 to the family of every Palestinian suicide bomber.

Based on this, Bush made a case for war against Saddam. That was hotly debated at the time. Most Republicans were in favor. Some Democrats, such as Hillary Clinton, were also in favor, while others, such as Barack Obama, were opposed.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

William JockuschWilliam Jockusch

1,7891314

add a comment | 

1

Sept. 11 changed everything. It demonstrated with the utmost clarity that even if the US were to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the rest of the world, the rest of the world was not going to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the US.

The first change was in Afghanistan. The Taliban had largely ruled Afghanistan since about 1996. The US certainly didn't like them, but also didn't view them as America's problem.

On September 11, the NSA and German intelligence both intercepted communications pointing to Bin Laden. Some hijackers were identified while the planes were still in the air. Mohamed Atta's luggage, which did not make his flight, was also helpful.

Already on Semptember 12, many in the US suspected that he was to blame.

It also helped that the hijackers purchased their tickets using their real names. By September 14, the FBI released the names of the hijackers.

Also on Sept. 14, Congress passed a law authorizing the military to attack anyone associated with terrorists. The vote was 98-0 in the Senate and 420-1 in the House.

On Sept. 21, the Taliban refused a US demand to hand over Bin Laden. For Bush, that was plenty of reason to go to war. The US decision to overthrow the Taliban was supported by nearly everyone in the US.

Then there was Iraq. Although he was not involved in planning them, Saddam Hussein originally praised the attacks. Saddam had used chemical weapons during the war against Iran, and he was refusing to cooperate with inspectors who were supposed to verify that he had given them up. Some people reasoned, wrongly, that if he didn't have anything to hide, he would be cooperating with the inspectors. And Saddam had a history of supporting terrorists, for example paying $25,000 to the family of every Palestinian suicide bomber.

Based on this, Bush made a case for war against Saddam. That was hotly debated at the time. Most Republicans were in favor. Some Democrats, such as Hillary Clinton, were also in favor, while others, such as Barack Obama, were opposed.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

William JockuschWilliam Jockusch

1,7891314

add a comment | 

Sept. 11 changed everything. It demonstrated with the utmost clarity that even if the US were to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the rest of the world, the rest of the world was not going to adopt a policy of nonintervention in the US.

The first change was in Afghanistan. The Taliban had largely ruled Afghanistan since about 1996. The US certainly didn't like them, but also didn't view them as America's problem.

On September 11, the NSA and German intelligence both intercepted communications pointing to Bin Laden. Some hijackers were identified while the planes were still in the air. Mohamed Atta's luggage, which did not make his flight, was also helpful.

Already on Semptember 12, many in the US suspected that he was to blame.

It also helped that the hijackers purchased their tickets using their real names. By September 14, the FBI released the names of the hijackers.

Also on Sept. 14, Congress passed a law authorizing the military to attack anyone associated with terrorists. The vote was 98-0 in the Senate and 420-1 in the House.

On Sept. 21, the Taliban refused a US demand to hand over Bin Laden. For Bush, that was plenty of reason to go to war. The US decision to overthrow the Taliban was supported by nearly everyone in the US.

Then there was Iraq. Although he was not involved in planning them, Saddam Hussein originally praised the attacks. Saddam had used chemical weapons during the war against Iran, and he was refusing to cooperate with inspectors who were supposed to verify that he had given them up. Some people reasoned, wrongly, that if he didn't have anything to hide, he would be cooperating with the inspectors. And Saddam had a history of supporting terrorists, for example paying $25,000 to the family of every Palestinian suicide bomber.

Based on this, Bush made a case for war against Saddam. That was hotly debated at the time. Most Republicans were in favor. Some Democrats, such as Hillary Clinton, were also in favor, while others, such as Barack Obama, were opposed.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

William JockuschWilliam Jockusch

1,7891314

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 1 hour ago

William JockuschWilliam Jockusch

1,7891314

answered 1 hour ago

William JockuschWilliam Jockusch

1,7891314

answered 1 hour ago

William JockuschWilliam Jockusch

1,7891314