Why do falling prices hurt debtors?Why isn't there an “ideal value” for a given currency?What benefits...

Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Test whether all array elements are factors of a number

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Mage Armor with Defense fighting style (for Adventurers League bladeslinger)

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Why do falling prices hurt debtors?

Test if tikzmark exists on same page

The Clique vs. Independent Set Problem

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

To string or not to string

Unknown notation: What do three bars mean?

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

How does strength of boric acid solution increase in presence of salicylic acid?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?



Why do falling prices hurt debtors?


Why isn't there an “ideal value” for a given currency?What benefits does Bitcoin (i.e. cryptocurrency) offer?Why didn't the money printing by the US Federal Reserve since 2008 lead to inflation?Why does deflation cause banks to increase their interest rates?Why is deflation not considered the opposite of inflation?Why does falling global bond yields signal coming deflationWhy not just print money to combat deflation?Deflation and positive real interest rateWhy do central banks print money?Currencies fixed to gold













2












$begingroup$


The argument goes that if there is deflation, the real interest rate rises, and so the burden on debtors increase (Paul Krugman says so in https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/why-is-deflation-bad/).



I understand why the real rate rises, since $r = i - pi$, but why does that mean there's more of a "burden" on debtors?



If I take out a loan for 1000 dollars today, and have to pay it back a year from now, why would it affect me negatively if suddenly everything became cheaper? Sure, the money I'd be paying back (1000 dollars + interest) is "worth more", in the sense of being able to buy more stuff, but ... so what? Those 1000 dollars + interest had to be paid back no matter what. Who cares if its "worth more"? It's not my money anyways, and is due to be paid back? How exactly has my "burden" increased?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    The argument goes that if there is deflation, the real interest rate rises, and so the burden on debtors increase (Paul Krugman says so in https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/why-is-deflation-bad/).



    I understand why the real rate rises, since $r = i - pi$, but why does that mean there's more of a "burden" on debtors?



    If I take out a loan for 1000 dollars today, and have to pay it back a year from now, why would it affect me negatively if suddenly everything became cheaper? Sure, the money I'd be paying back (1000 dollars + interest) is "worth more", in the sense of being able to buy more stuff, but ... so what? Those 1000 dollars + interest had to be paid back no matter what. Who cares if its "worth more"? It's not my money anyways, and is due to be paid back? How exactly has my "burden" increased?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      The argument goes that if there is deflation, the real interest rate rises, and so the burden on debtors increase (Paul Krugman says so in https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/why-is-deflation-bad/).



      I understand why the real rate rises, since $r = i - pi$, but why does that mean there's more of a "burden" on debtors?



      If I take out a loan for 1000 dollars today, and have to pay it back a year from now, why would it affect me negatively if suddenly everything became cheaper? Sure, the money I'd be paying back (1000 dollars + interest) is "worth more", in the sense of being able to buy more stuff, but ... so what? Those 1000 dollars + interest had to be paid back no matter what. Who cares if its "worth more"? It's not my money anyways, and is due to be paid back? How exactly has my "burden" increased?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      The argument goes that if there is deflation, the real interest rate rises, and so the burden on debtors increase (Paul Krugman says so in https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/why-is-deflation-bad/).



      I understand why the real rate rises, since $r = i - pi$, but why does that mean there's more of a "burden" on debtors?



      If I take out a loan for 1000 dollars today, and have to pay it back a year from now, why would it affect me negatively if suddenly everything became cheaper? Sure, the money I'd be paying back (1000 dollars + interest) is "worth more", in the sense of being able to buy more stuff, but ... so what? Those 1000 dollars + interest had to be paid back no matter what. Who cares if its "worth more"? It's not my money anyways, and is due to be paid back? How exactly has my "burden" increased?







      deflation






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Brian Romanchuk

      3,8191316




      3,8191316






      New contributor




      Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      KastrupKastrup

      111




      111




      New contributor




      Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Kastrup is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          If the borrower is a firm, lower prices means your output is selling for less, so you need to sell more units in order to repay the debt (assuming a constant profit margin).



          For an individual, the buried assumption is that wages are also falling in the deflation. In which case, the debt is increasing relative to your wages. However, if your wages have not fallen, falling prices will make it easier for you to repay the debt (you can consume the same amount, and have more money left over to repay debt).



          It makes more sense at the macro level, as deflation is normally associated with lower growth and a higher unemployment rate.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The same article by Krugman mentions that wages don't fall due to downwards rigidity, so that can't be the buried assumption (at least not his).
            $endgroup$
            – Kastrup
            26 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Kastrup Krugman is not universally acclaimed for his consistent reasoning.
            $endgroup$
            – chrylis
            21 mins ago












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "591"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Kastrup is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27662%2fwhy-do-falling-prices-hurt-debtors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          If the borrower is a firm, lower prices means your output is selling for less, so you need to sell more units in order to repay the debt (assuming a constant profit margin).



          For an individual, the buried assumption is that wages are also falling in the deflation. In which case, the debt is increasing relative to your wages. However, if your wages have not fallen, falling prices will make it easier for you to repay the debt (you can consume the same amount, and have more money left over to repay debt).



          It makes more sense at the macro level, as deflation is normally associated with lower growth and a higher unemployment rate.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The same article by Krugman mentions that wages don't fall due to downwards rigidity, so that can't be the buried assumption (at least not his).
            $endgroup$
            – Kastrup
            26 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Kastrup Krugman is not universally acclaimed for his consistent reasoning.
            $endgroup$
            – chrylis
            21 mins ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          If the borrower is a firm, lower prices means your output is selling for less, so you need to sell more units in order to repay the debt (assuming a constant profit margin).



          For an individual, the buried assumption is that wages are also falling in the deflation. In which case, the debt is increasing relative to your wages. However, if your wages have not fallen, falling prices will make it easier for you to repay the debt (you can consume the same amount, and have more money left over to repay debt).



          It makes more sense at the macro level, as deflation is normally associated with lower growth and a higher unemployment rate.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The same article by Krugman mentions that wages don't fall due to downwards rigidity, so that can't be the buried assumption (at least not his).
            $endgroup$
            – Kastrup
            26 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Kastrup Krugman is not universally acclaimed for his consistent reasoning.
            $endgroup$
            – chrylis
            21 mins ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          If the borrower is a firm, lower prices means your output is selling for less, so you need to sell more units in order to repay the debt (assuming a constant profit margin).



          For an individual, the buried assumption is that wages are also falling in the deflation. In which case, the debt is increasing relative to your wages. However, if your wages have not fallen, falling prices will make it easier for you to repay the debt (you can consume the same amount, and have more money left over to repay debt).



          It makes more sense at the macro level, as deflation is normally associated with lower growth and a higher unemployment rate.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If the borrower is a firm, lower prices means your output is selling for less, so you need to sell more units in order to repay the debt (assuming a constant profit margin).



          For an individual, the buried assumption is that wages are also falling in the deflation. In which case, the debt is increasing relative to your wages. However, if your wages have not fallen, falling prices will make it easier for you to repay the debt (you can consume the same amount, and have more money left over to repay debt).



          It makes more sense at the macro level, as deflation is normally associated with lower growth and a higher unemployment rate.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          Brian RomanchukBrian Romanchuk

          3,8191316




          3,8191316












          • $begingroup$
            The same article by Krugman mentions that wages don't fall due to downwards rigidity, so that can't be the buried assumption (at least not his).
            $endgroup$
            – Kastrup
            26 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Kastrup Krugman is not universally acclaimed for his consistent reasoning.
            $endgroup$
            – chrylis
            21 mins ago


















          • $begingroup$
            The same article by Krugman mentions that wages don't fall due to downwards rigidity, so that can't be the buried assumption (at least not his).
            $endgroup$
            – Kastrup
            26 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Kastrup Krugman is not universally acclaimed for his consistent reasoning.
            $endgroup$
            – chrylis
            21 mins ago
















          $begingroup$
          The same article by Krugman mentions that wages don't fall due to downwards rigidity, so that can't be the buried assumption (at least not his).
          $endgroup$
          – Kastrup
          26 mins ago






          $begingroup$
          The same article by Krugman mentions that wages don't fall due to downwards rigidity, so that can't be the buried assumption (at least not his).
          $endgroup$
          – Kastrup
          26 mins ago














          $begingroup$
          @Kastrup Krugman is not universally acclaimed for his consistent reasoning.
          $endgroup$
          – chrylis
          21 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          @Kastrup Krugman is not universally acclaimed for his consistent reasoning.
          $endgroup$
          – chrylis
          21 mins ago










          Kastrup is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Kastrup is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Kastrup is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Kastrup is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Economics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27662%2fwhy-do-falling-prices-hurt-debtors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          “%fieldName is a required field.”, in Magento2 REST API Call for GET Method Type The Next...

          How to change City field to a dropdown in Checkout step Magento 2Magento 2 : How to change UI field(s)...

          變成蝙蝠會怎樣? 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Thomas Nagel, "What is it like to be a...