Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about...
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
Pattern match does not work in bash script
Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus
Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file
TGV timetables / schedules?
Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Unknown notation: What do three bars mean?
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing
Is a tag line useful on a cover?
US citizen flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Characters won't fit in table
Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )
"to be prejudice towards/against someone" vs "to be prejudiced against/towards someone"
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
tikz: show 0 at the axis origin
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?
Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbf{NC_2}$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
complexity-theory
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl
262
262
New contributor
New contributor
2
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl
262
262
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
1 hour ago