Examples of odd-dimensional manifolds that do not admit contact structurethe existence of (almost) contact...



Examples of odd-dimensional manifolds that do not admit contact structure


the existence of (almost) contact (metric) structureTight vs. overtwisted contact structureThree-dimensional compact Kähler manifoldsIs there a Legendrian Neighbourhood Theorem also for non-cooriented contact manifolds?Is there a “unique” homogeneous contact structure on odd-dimensional spheres?Symplectic Submanifolds of Contact Manifolds and Contact Submanifolds of Symplectic Manifolds'Unitary' charts on odd-dimensional spheresContact manifolds and pseudodifferential operatorsWhich manifolds admit free involutions?First Chern Class of Contact Structure which is not Torsion













3












$begingroup$


I'm having an hard time trying to figuring out a concrete example of an odd-dimensional closed manifold that do not admit any contact structure.
Can someone provide me with some examples?






dg.differential-geometry at.algebraic-topology differential-topology contact-geometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not exactly answering the question since I'm not providing examples, but for a manifold $M^{2n+1}$, it turns out that admitting a contact structure is equivalent to admitting a reduction of structure group to $U(n) times 1$ (such a reduction is called an almost contact structure), as proved by Borman, Eliashberg, and Murphy. The contact structures they produce for a given almost contact class are overtwisted, meaning they contain some model overtwisted chart. It is a more difficult question to ask when a manifold admits a tight (= non-overtwisted) contact structure.
    $endgroup$
    – KSackel
    1 hour ago
















3












$begingroup$


I'm having an hard time trying to figuring out a concrete example of an odd-dimensional closed manifold that do not admit any contact structure.
Can someone provide me with some examples?






dg.differential-geometry at.algebraic-topology differential-topology contact-geometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not exactly answering the question since I'm not providing examples, but for a manifold $M^{2n+1}$, it turns out that admitting a contact structure is equivalent to admitting a reduction of structure group to $U(n) times 1$ (such a reduction is called an almost contact structure), as proved by Borman, Eliashberg, and Murphy. The contact structures they produce for a given almost contact class are overtwisted, meaning they contain some model overtwisted chart. It is a more difficult question to ask when a manifold admits a tight (= non-overtwisted) contact structure.
    $endgroup$
    – KSackel
    1 hour ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I'm having an hard time trying to figuring out a concrete example of an odd-dimensional closed manifold that do not admit any contact structure.
Can someone provide me with some examples?






dg.differential-geometry at.algebraic-topology differential-topology contact-geometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm having an hard time trying to figuring out a concrete example of an odd-dimensional closed manifold that do not admit any contact structure.
Can someone provide me with some examples?






dg.differential-geometry at.algebraic-topology differential-topology contact-geometry




dg.differential-geometry at.algebraic-topology differential-topology contact-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Piotr Hajlasz

9,46843672




9,46843672










asked 2 hours ago









Warlock of Firetop MountainWarlock of Firetop Mountain

24717




24717








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not exactly answering the question since I'm not providing examples, but for a manifold $M^{2n+1}$, it turns out that admitting a contact structure is equivalent to admitting a reduction of structure group to $U(n) times 1$ (such a reduction is called an almost contact structure), as proved by Borman, Eliashberg, and Murphy. The contact structures they produce for a given almost contact class are overtwisted, meaning they contain some model overtwisted chart. It is a more difficult question to ask when a manifold admits a tight (= non-overtwisted) contact structure.
    $endgroup$
    – KSackel
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not exactly answering the question since I'm not providing examples, but for a manifold $M^{2n+1}$, it turns out that admitting a contact structure is equivalent to admitting a reduction of structure group to $U(n) times 1$ (such a reduction is called an almost contact structure), as proved by Borman, Eliashberg, and Murphy. The contact structures they produce for a given almost contact class are overtwisted, meaning they contain some model overtwisted chart. It is a more difficult question to ask when a manifold admits a tight (= non-overtwisted) contact structure.
    $endgroup$
    – KSackel
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Not exactly answering the question since I'm not providing examples, but for a manifold $M^{2n+1}$, it turns out that admitting a contact structure is equivalent to admitting a reduction of structure group to $U(n) times 1$ (such a reduction is called an almost contact structure), as proved by Borman, Eliashberg, and Murphy. The contact structures they produce for a given almost contact class are overtwisted, meaning they contain some model overtwisted chart. It is a more difficult question to ask when a manifold admits a tight (= non-overtwisted) contact structure.
$endgroup$
– KSackel
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Not exactly answering the question since I'm not providing examples, but for a manifold $M^{2n+1}$, it turns out that admitting a contact structure is equivalent to admitting a reduction of structure group to $U(n) times 1$ (such a reduction is called an almost contact structure), as proved by Borman, Eliashberg, and Murphy. The contact structures they produce for a given almost contact class are overtwisted, meaning they contain some model overtwisted chart. It is a more difficult question to ask when a manifold admits a tight (= non-overtwisted) contact structure.
$endgroup$
– KSackel
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Every compact orientable $3$-dimensional manifold has a contact structure [1]. On the other hand we have




Theorem. For $ngeq 2$ there is a closed oriented connected manifold of dimension $2n+1$ without a contact structure.




For $n=2$, $SU(3)/SO(3)$ has no contact structure and for $n>2$,
$SU(3)/SO(3)timesmathbb{S}^{2n-4}$ has no contact structure, see Proposition 2.4 in [2].



[1] J. Martinet,
Formes de contact sur les variétés de dimension 3. Proceedings of Liverpool Singularities Symposium, II (1969/1970), pp. 142–163. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 209, Springer, Berlin, 1971.



[2] R. E. Stong, Contact manifolds. J. Differential Geometry 9 (1974), 219–238.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325397%2fexamples-of-odd-dimensional-manifolds-that-do-not-admit-contact-structure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Every compact orientable $3$-dimensional manifold has a contact structure [1]. On the other hand we have




    Theorem. For $ngeq 2$ there is a closed oriented connected manifold of dimension $2n+1$ without a contact structure.




    For $n=2$, $SU(3)/SO(3)$ has no contact structure and for $n>2$,
    $SU(3)/SO(3)timesmathbb{S}^{2n-4}$ has no contact structure, see Proposition 2.4 in [2].



    [1] J. Martinet,
    Formes de contact sur les variétés de dimension 3. Proceedings of Liverpool Singularities Symposium, II (1969/1970), pp. 142–163. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 209, Springer, Berlin, 1971.



    [2] R. E. Stong, Contact manifolds. J. Differential Geometry 9 (1974), 219–238.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$

      Every compact orientable $3$-dimensional manifold has a contact structure [1]. On the other hand we have




      Theorem. For $ngeq 2$ there is a closed oriented connected manifold of dimension $2n+1$ without a contact structure.




      For $n=2$, $SU(3)/SO(3)$ has no contact structure and for $n>2$,
      $SU(3)/SO(3)timesmathbb{S}^{2n-4}$ has no contact structure, see Proposition 2.4 in [2].



      [1] J. Martinet,
      Formes de contact sur les variétés de dimension 3. Proceedings of Liverpool Singularities Symposium, II (1969/1970), pp. 142–163. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 209, Springer, Berlin, 1971.



      [2] R. E. Stong, Contact manifolds. J. Differential Geometry 9 (1974), 219–238.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        Every compact orientable $3$-dimensional manifold has a contact structure [1]. On the other hand we have




        Theorem. For $ngeq 2$ there is a closed oriented connected manifold of dimension $2n+1$ without a contact structure.




        For $n=2$, $SU(3)/SO(3)$ has no contact structure and for $n>2$,
        $SU(3)/SO(3)timesmathbb{S}^{2n-4}$ has no contact structure, see Proposition 2.4 in [2].



        [1] J. Martinet,
        Formes de contact sur les variétés de dimension 3. Proceedings of Liverpool Singularities Symposium, II (1969/1970), pp. 142–163. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 209, Springer, Berlin, 1971.



        [2] R. E. Stong, Contact manifolds. J. Differential Geometry 9 (1974), 219–238.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Every compact orientable $3$-dimensional manifold has a contact structure [1]. On the other hand we have




        Theorem. For $ngeq 2$ there is a closed oriented connected manifold of dimension $2n+1$ without a contact structure.




        For $n=2$, $SU(3)/SO(3)$ has no contact structure and for $n>2$,
        $SU(3)/SO(3)timesmathbb{S}^{2n-4}$ has no contact structure, see Proposition 2.4 in [2].



        [1] J. Martinet,
        Formes de contact sur les variétés de dimension 3. Proceedings of Liverpool Singularities Symposium, II (1969/1970), pp. 142–163. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 209, Springer, Berlin, 1971.



        [2] R. E. Stong, Contact manifolds. J. Differential Geometry 9 (1974), 219–238.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Piotr HajlaszPiotr Hajlasz

        9,46843672




        9,46843672






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325397%2fexamples-of-odd-dimensional-manifolds-that-do-not-admit-contact-structure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            “%fieldName is a required field.”, in Magento2 REST API Call for GET Method Type The Next...

            Image
            How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage? Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer? Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet? How to keep a dark protagonist who wants to keep his humanity dark? How does a dynamic QR code work? My singleton can be called multiple times How to detect integer overflow in C? Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university? How to travel Japan while expressing milk? Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground? How to show a landlord what we have in s...
            Read more

            How to change City field to a dropdown in Checkout step Magento 2Magento 2 : How to change UI field(s)...

            Image
            Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system? Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows! Understanding a proof about a set being closed Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables? Movie: boy escapes the real world and goes to a fantasy world with big furry trolls Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix? I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I am being punished. What should I do? Solving Linear Matrix Recurrences What is the generally accepted pronunciation of “topoi”? Is it safe to abruplty remove arduino power ...
            Read more

            變成蝙蝠會怎樣？ 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Thomas Nagel, "What is it like to be a...

            Image
            心靈哲學思想實驗 湯瑪斯·內格爾感質物理心靈解釋鴻溝物理信息蝙蝠物理主義科學還原經驗現象學聲吶超音波神經衝動 成為一隻蝙蝠可能是什麼樣子？ 〈 成為一隻蝙蝠可能是什麼樣子 〉（ What is it like to be a bat? ）是湯瑪斯·內格爾在1974年發表的論文，旨在說明感質在物理與心靈之間的解釋鴻溝（ Explanatory gap （ 英语 ： Explanatory gap ） ）。 根據內格爾的論證，物理信息（ Physical information （ 英语 ： Physical information ） ）無法讓我們知道身為一隻蝙蝠的感覺是什麼，也藉此推知，我們無法知道他人對於顏色、聲音、氣味、疼痛等等的感覺「是什麼感覺」。首先，根據物理主義，世界上所有事物似乎都能由科學來解釋，每個人個別的、主觀的感質，是否也能還原為客觀的物理信息？內格爾認為，「從還原中排除經驗的現象學特徵是不可能的」。 [1] 譬如蝙蝠是由聲吶或回聲來感知世界，藉此得知物體的距離、大小、形狀等等。由於蝙蝠的感受方式與我們有很大的不同，我們無法以自身的內在生活去推知蝙蝠的內在生活，所以我們無法得知身為一隻蝙蝠真正的感覺是什麼。就算以科學方法得知蝙蝠在接收到超音波時，腦中會出現特定的神經衝動，但人類不能知道腦中產生那種神經衝動「是什麼感覺」。只有從蝙蝠的主觀觀點出發，才會知道是蝙蝠是什麼感覺，牠的感覺無法用物理的術語去理解，因為物理術語必定是以許多觀點都能理解為基礎的。 參考資料 ^ 內格爾：〈成為一隻蝙蝠可能是什麼樣子？〉，高新民、儲昭華主編：《心靈哲學》（北京：商務印書館，2002），頁107。 外部連結 Thomas Nagel, "What is it like to be a bat?" 这是一篇與哲學相關的小作品。你可以通过编辑或修订扩充其内容。 查 论 编 This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
            Read more