Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids....

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

draw a pulley system

Meaning of 境 in その日を境に

Problem with display of presentation

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Is there night in Alpha Complex?

French equivalents of おしゃれは足元から (Every good outfit starts with the shoes)

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple, reliable and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

First paper to introduce the "principal-agent problem"

Where did Ptolemy compare the Earth to the distance of fixed stars?

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

Twin's vs. Twins'

Does a random sequence of vectors span a Hilbert space?

How does TikZ render an arc?

The Nth Gryphon Number

Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?

How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?

One-one communication

Did John Wesley plagiarize Matthew Henry...?

Why are current probes so expensive?



Proving that any solution to the differential equation of an oscillator can be written as a sum of sinusoids.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How can the general Green's function of a linear homogeneous differential equation be derived?Proving a system of n linear equations has only one solutionThe pair $x_1$ , $x_2$ are Linearly IndependentName/Solution of this Differential EquationEvery solution of some linear differential equation of order 2 is boundedSolution of Matrix differential equation $textbf{X}'(t)=textbf{A}textbf{X}(t)$How to relate the solutions to a Fuchsian type differential equation to the solutions to the hypergeometric differential equation?Difference between real and complex solution in differential equationFinding the general solution to a system of differential equations using eigenvaluesTwo systems of linear equations equivalent












2












$begingroup$


Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



$frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=k_{11}x_1+...k_{1n}x_n$



.



.



.



$frac{d^2x_n}{dt^2}=k_{n1}x_1+...k_{nn}x_n$



I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^{iw_1t},...,e^{iw_1t}), (e^{iw_2t},...e^{iw_2t}), ...,(e^{iw_mt},...e^{iw_mt})$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



    $frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=k_{11}x_1+...k_{1n}x_n$



    .



    .



    .



    $frac{d^2x_n}{dt^2}=k_{n1}x_1+...k_{nn}x_n$



    I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



    can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^{iw_1t},...,e^{iw_1t}), (e^{iw_2t},...e^{iw_2t}), ...,(e^{iw_mt},...e^{iw_mt})$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



    i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



      $frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=k_{11}x_1+...k_{1n}x_n$



      .



      .



      .



      $frac{d^2x_n}{dt^2}=k_{n1}x_1+...k_{nn}x_n$



      I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



      can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^{iw_1t},...,e^{iw_1t}), (e^{iw_2t},...e^{iw_2t}), ...,(e^{iw_mt},...e^{iw_mt})$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



      i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose you have a differential equation with n distinct functions of $t$ where



      $frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=k_{11}x_1+...k_{1n}x_n$



      .



      .



      .



      $frac{d^2x_n}{dt^2}=k_{n1}x_1+...k_{nn}x_n$



      I want to show that any set of solutions of this differential equation $(x_1,x_2,...,x_n) $



      can be written as a linear combination of solutions of the form $(e^{iw_1t},...,e^{iw_1t}), (e^{iw_2t},...e^{iw_2t}), ...,(e^{iw_mt},...e^{iw_mt})$ where each $w_j$ is a real number.



      i.e. I want to know why the motion of any oscillator can be written as a linear combination of its normal modes. I would also appreciate it if you could tell me if a proof of this fact has to do with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in general.







      linear-algebra ordinary-differential-equations physics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      user446153user446153

      1075




      1075






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



          $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} left[begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{array}right] = left[begin{array}{ccc} k_{11} & cdots & k_{1n} \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_{1n} & cdots & k_{nn} end{array}right] left[ begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_nend{array}right]$$



          $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = K vec{x}$$



          The matrix $K=[k_{ij}]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



          We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



          Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



          Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^{-1} K V$.



          We can now write the system of differential equations as,



          $$
          frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = V Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
          $$



          $$
          V^{-1}frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
          $$



          $$
          frac{d^2}{dt^2} V^{-1}vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
          $$



          Let $vec{y} = V^{-1} vec{x}$, then we have $
          frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{y} = Lambda vec{y}
          $
          . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



          $$
          frac{d^2 y_1}{dt^2} = lambda_1 y_1
          $$

          $$
          frac{d^2 y_2}{dt^2} = lambda_2 y_2
          $$

          $$
          vdots
          $$

          $$
          frac{d^2 y_n}{dt^2} = lambda_n y_n
          $$



          Clearly the solutions are of the form,



          $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^{sqrt{lambda_j} t} + C_2 e^{-sqrt{lambda_j} t},$$



          to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



          $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_{ji} y_i(t)$$



          Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196600%2fproving-that-any-solution-to-the-differential-equation-of-an-oscillator-can-be-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



            $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} left[begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{array}right] = left[begin{array}{ccc} k_{11} & cdots & k_{1n} \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_{1n} & cdots & k_{nn} end{array}right] left[ begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_nend{array}right]$$



            $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = K vec{x}$$



            The matrix $K=[k_{ij}]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



            We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



            Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



            Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^{-1} K V$.



            We can now write the system of differential equations as,



            $$
            frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = V Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
            $$



            $$
            V^{-1}frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
            $$



            $$
            frac{d^2}{dt^2} V^{-1}vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
            $$



            Let $vec{y} = V^{-1} vec{x}$, then we have $
            frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{y} = Lambda vec{y}
            $
            . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



            $$
            frac{d^2 y_1}{dt^2} = lambda_1 y_1
            $$

            $$
            frac{d^2 y_2}{dt^2} = lambda_2 y_2
            $$

            $$
            vdots
            $$

            $$
            frac{d^2 y_n}{dt^2} = lambda_n y_n
            $$



            Clearly the solutions are of the form,



            $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^{sqrt{lambda_j} t} + C_2 e^{-sqrt{lambda_j} t},$$



            to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



            $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_{ji} y_i(t)$$



            Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



              $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} left[begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{array}right] = left[begin{array}{ccc} k_{11} & cdots & k_{1n} \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_{1n} & cdots & k_{nn} end{array}right] left[ begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_nend{array}right]$$



              $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = K vec{x}$$



              The matrix $K=[k_{ij}]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



              We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



              Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



              Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^{-1} K V$.



              We can now write the system of differential equations as,



              $$
              frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = V Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
              $$



              $$
              V^{-1}frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
              $$



              $$
              frac{d^2}{dt^2} V^{-1}vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
              $$



              Let $vec{y} = V^{-1} vec{x}$, then we have $
              frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{y} = Lambda vec{y}
              $
              . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



              $$
              frac{d^2 y_1}{dt^2} = lambda_1 y_1
              $$

              $$
              frac{d^2 y_2}{dt^2} = lambda_2 y_2
              $$

              $$
              vdots
              $$

              $$
              frac{d^2 y_n}{dt^2} = lambda_n y_n
              $$



              Clearly the solutions are of the form,



              $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^{sqrt{lambda_j} t} + C_2 e^{-sqrt{lambda_j} t},$$



              to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



              $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_{ji} y_i(t)$$



              Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



                $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} left[begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{array}right] = left[begin{array}{ccc} k_{11} & cdots & k_{1n} \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_{1n} & cdots & k_{nn} end{array}right] left[ begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_nend{array}right]$$



                $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = K vec{x}$$



                The matrix $K=[k_{ij}]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



                We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



                Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



                Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^{-1} K V$.



                We can now write the system of differential equations as,



                $$
                frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = V Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
                $$



                $$
                V^{-1}frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
                $$



                $$
                frac{d^2}{dt^2} V^{-1}vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
                $$



                Let $vec{y} = V^{-1} vec{x}$, then we have $
                frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{y} = Lambda vec{y}
                $
                . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



                $$
                frac{d^2 y_1}{dt^2} = lambda_1 y_1
                $$

                $$
                frac{d^2 y_2}{dt^2} = lambda_2 y_2
                $$

                $$
                vdots
                $$

                $$
                frac{d^2 y_n}{dt^2} = lambda_n y_n
                $$



                Clearly the solutions are of the form,



                $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^{sqrt{lambda_j} t} + C_2 e^{-sqrt{lambda_j} t},$$



                to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



                $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_{ji} y_i(t)$$



                Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The system of differential equations you wrote could be written as,



                $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} left[begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{array}right] = left[begin{array}{ccc} k_{11} & cdots & k_{1n} \ vdots & ddots & vdots \ k_{1n} & cdots & k_{nn} end{array}right] left[ begin{array}{c} x_1 \ vdots \ x_nend{array}right]$$



                $$ frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = K vec{x}$$



                The matrix $K=[k_{ij}]$ acts on the indices of the functions $x_1,dots,x_n$.



                We will suppose that $K$ is diagonalizable with eigenvalues $lambda_1, dots, lambda_n$.



                Let $Lambda$ be the diagonal form of $K$.



                Let $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors of $K$. Note that $Lambda = V^{-1} K V$.



                We can now write the system of differential equations as,



                $$
                frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = V Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
                $$



                $$
                V^{-1}frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
                $$



                $$
                frac{d^2}{dt^2} V^{-1}vec{x} = Lambda V^{-1} vec{x}
                $$



                Let $vec{y} = V^{-1} vec{x}$, then we have $
                frac{d^2}{dt^2} vec{y} = Lambda vec{y}
                $
                . This corresponds to the following system of equations.



                $$
                frac{d^2 y_1}{dt^2} = lambda_1 y_1
                $$

                $$
                frac{d^2 y_2}{dt^2} = lambda_2 y_2
                $$

                $$
                vdots
                $$

                $$
                frac{d^2 y_n}{dt^2} = lambda_n y_n
                $$



                Clearly the solutions are of the form,



                $$y_j(t) = C_1 e^{sqrt{lambda_j} t} + C_2 e^{-sqrt{lambda_j} t},$$



                to obtain the $x_j$'s we just multiply by the $V$ matrix.



                $$ x_j(t) = sum_i V_{ji} y_i(t)$$



                Whether or not the solutions are oscillators depends on whether the eigenvalues are positive, negative, or complex. In physical applications it wouldn't be uncommon for $K$ to be a symmetric matrix with negative eigenvalues.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                SpencerSpencer

                8,76812156




                8,76812156






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196600%2fproving-that-any-solution-to-the-differential-equation-of-an-oscillator-can-be-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    “%fieldName is a required field.”, in Magento2 REST API Call for GET Method Type The Next...

                    How to change City field to a dropdown in Checkout step Magento 2Magento 2 : How to change UI field(s)...

                    變成蝙蝠會怎樣? 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Thomas Nagel, "What is it like to be a...