Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?Parashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverShulchan...
Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"
Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?
Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?
I see my dog run
How to manage monthly salary
What to wear for invited talk in Canada
Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?
Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors
How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
Pristine Bit Checking
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?
Add an angle to a sphere
Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
Parashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverShulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?Are there practices where Sepharadim do not hold by Shulchan Aruch?5th part of the shulchan aruch
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
1
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
shulchan-aruch
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
asked 2 hours ago
DonielFDonielF
17k12689
17k12689
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
1
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
1
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
1
1
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
1 hour ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
1 hour ago
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
1 hour ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
1 hour ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered 2 hours ago
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
1 hour ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
1 hour ago
add a comment |
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
1 hour ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
1 hour ago
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
1 hour ago
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
1 hour ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
1 hour ago
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
1
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
1 hour ago
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
1 hour ago
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
answered 1 hour ago
AlexAlex
23.4k157133
23.4k157133
add a comment |
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
1
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago