What is “leading note” and what does it mean to “raise a note”? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1:...
Are all CP/M-80 implementations binary compatible?
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
std::is_constructible on incomplete types
Will I lose my paid in full property
Is Bran literally the world's memory?
Did the Roman Empire have Penal Colonies?
Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?
Is accepting an invalid credit card number a security issue?
With indentation set to `0em`, when using a line break, there is still an indentation of a size of a space
My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?
Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)
Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?
Do I need to protect SFP ports and optics from dust/contaminants? If so, how?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Refugee travel document from Spain to US
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Could Neutrino technically as side-effect, incentivize centralization of the bitcoin network?
A Paper Record is What I Hamper
Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson Binomial Distribution?
Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?
What is it called when you ride around on your front wheel?
What is “leading note” and what does it mean to “raise a note”?
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhen did the aeolian mode change to the harmonic minor?Why does Fux use F# in his counterpoint to a firmus written in G mixolydianVoice-leading and CompositionWhat does this crossed-note notation mean?Ornaments in J. S. Bach's 4th preludeAlgorithm for Transposing Chords Between KeysWhat does an apostrophe on top of a note mean?The last note and only the last note!What does the 15 mean?What does “potential dissonance” or “potential consonance” mean?What does “vos” mean?
I try to learn rules of how basic melody ("Cantus Firmus") should be built. At the moment I read this document. The second rule there is:
The penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner i.e.
from one note above or below the final. If approaching from below the
leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)
What is "leading note" and what does it mean to "raise a note"?
I did check Wikipedia and it says:
a leading-note is a note or pitch which resolves or "leads" to a note
one semitone higher or lower
This statement is also not clear to me. What does it mean "leads to" and "resolves"? Are these two different things or just two different names for the same thing? Does "leads to" mean just "precedes"?
theory counterpoint
add a comment |
I try to learn rules of how basic melody ("Cantus Firmus") should be built. At the moment I read this document. The second rule there is:
The penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner i.e.
from one note above or below the final. If approaching from below the
leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)
What is "leading note" and what does it mean to "raise a note"?
I did check Wikipedia and it says:
a leading-note is a note or pitch which resolves or "leads" to a note
one semitone higher or lower
This statement is also not clear to me. What does it mean "leads to" and "resolves"? Are these two different things or just two different names for the same thing? Does "leads to" mean just "precedes"?
theory counterpoint
this question is related to my question of some days ago which is not yet fully answered: music.stackexchange.com/questions/82936/…. Mind that these rules for cantus firmus by Lindsay Davidson cited by Fux' Gradus ad Parnassum are a mix of several centuries and for a style of strict counterpoint that never has been written by composers - except in exercices of students.
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
add a comment |
I try to learn rules of how basic melody ("Cantus Firmus") should be built. At the moment I read this document. The second rule there is:
The penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner i.e.
from one note above or below the final. If approaching from below the
leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)
What is "leading note" and what does it mean to "raise a note"?
I did check Wikipedia and it says:
a leading-note is a note or pitch which resolves or "leads" to a note
one semitone higher or lower
This statement is also not clear to me. What does it mean "leads to" and "resolves"? Are these two different things or just two different names for the same thing? Does "leads to" mean just "precedes"?
theory counterpoint
I try to learn rules of how basic melody ("Cantus Firmus") should be built. At the moment I read this document. The second rule there is:
The penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner i.e.
from one note above or below the final. If approaching from below the
leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)
What is "leading note" and what does it mean to "raise a note"?
I did check Wikipedia and it says:
a leading-note is a note or pitch which resolves or "leads" to a note
one semitone higher or lower
This statement is also not clear to me. What does it mean "leads to" and "resolves"? Are these two different things or just two different names for the same thing? Does "leads to" mean just "precedes"?
theory counterpoint
theory counterpoint
edited 7 hours ago
Todd Wilcox
37.8k371127
37.8k371127
asked 9 hours ago
RomanRoman
1213
1213
this question is related to my question of some days ago which is not yet fully answered: music.stackexchange.com/questions/82936/…. Mind that these rules for cantus firmus by Lindsay Davidson cited by Fux' Gradus ad Parnassum are a mix of several centuries and for a style of strict counterpoint that never has been written by composers - except in exercices of students.
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
add a comment |
this question is related to my question of some days ago which is not yet fully answered: music.stackexchange.com/questions/82936/…. Mind that these rules for cantus firmus by Lindsay Davidson cited by Fux' Gradus ad Parnassum are a mix of several centuries and for a style of strict counterpoint that never has been written by composers - except in exercices of students.
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
this question is related to my question of some days ago which is not yet fully answered: music.stackexchange.com/questions/82936/…. Mind that these rules for cantus firmus by Lindsay Davidson cited by Fux' Gradus ad Parnassum are a mix of several centuries and for a style of strict counterpoint that never has been written by composers - except in exercices of students.
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
this question is related to my question of some days ago which is not yet fully answered: music.stackexchange.com/questions/82936/…. Mind that these rules for cantus firmus by Lindsay Davidson cited by Fux' Gradus ad Parnassum are a mix of several centuries and for a style of strict counterpoint that never has been written by composers - except in exercices of students.
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Basically these are synonymous terms: "leads to" and "resolves."
A very important concept in tonal harmony is the strong sense of movement in the half steps of the diatonic scales. In solfege these are the tone pairs TI
to DO
and FA
to MI
.
Things can get confusing if we discuss the leading tone and resolution_and_ jump between different musical styles. You mentioned cantus firmus which suggests 16th century counterpoint, modal scales, and the species counterpoint teaching of Fux. In the 18th century homophonic style the leading tone and harmony have a different treatment with parts rooted in the older style. Let's look at the two separately. Just remember: two different styles, two different approaches.
16th century
The quote "...penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner..." is describing the clausula vera, the final cadence in 16th century style. The idea is the final tone - the tonic - should be approached by two voices in contrary motion one voice moving by a whole step and the other moving by a half step. When the final is approached from below by a half step that penultimate tone is the leading tone. The exact handling depends on the mode so let's just run through each mode.
In Ionian and Lydian modes the tones above and below the final are a whole step and a half step. Let's use C
as a final. The whole step above is D
and the half step below is B
. When B
and D
move to C
to end this is the clausula vera. The B
a half step below the C
is the leading tone.
In Dorian, Aeolian, and Mixolydian modes the tones above and below the final are both whole steps. Let's use D
as the final. The two whole steps are the E
above and the C
below. If we use those diatonic pitches and move C
and E
to D
to end it is not a clausula vera! One voice needs to be altered to make a movement by half step. The convention is to raise the tone below the final by a half step. This will make our C
become a C#
. This gives us the correct movement for a clausula vera and the C#
has become a leading tone (because it is one half step under the final.) Note: The unaltered tone a whole step below the final can be called the subtonic.
In Phrygian mode we have a unique situation. The tones above and below are a half step and a whole step. Instead of the half step being located under the final, it is located above the final. Technically we fulfill the definition of a clausula vera, because when the voices move to the final one moves by whole step and the other by half step. But we don't really have a proper leading tone below the tonic. The tone above is sort of like a leading tone. This half step approach from above give a unique flavor to the Phrygian mode the other modes don't have. To illustrate, let's use E
as the final. The half step above is F
and the whole step below is D
. When D
and F
move to E
we have a clausula vera without altering any tones with accidentals, but technically there is not a leading tone.
18th century
Briefly, let's consider 18th century harmony. During that time period the modes were no longer used. Instead harmony used the major/minor system. In that system we can shift the tonic around temporarily using tonicizations and modulations. Without going into too much detail, any diatonic major or minor chord in a given key can temporarily become the tonic. The root of such chords will become the temporary tonic, and the half step below that tone will be the temporary leading tone. For example, in C
major the chords D
minor, E
minor, F
major, G
major, and A
minor can all become temporary tonics. The tones a half step below each of those roots will be temporary leading tones - C#
to D
, D#
to E
, E
to F
, F#
to G
, and G#
to A
.
You can link the 18th century style back to the 16th century style by constructing a clausula vera to lead to any of those tonics. But in modern terminology we don't call it a clausula vera. Instead it is called a secondary or applied dominant and label them with Roman numeral analysis symbols. For example, the temporary leading tone move to D
in the key C
major would be labelled like: V6/ii
to ii
.
I packed a lot of theory into a very short description. Take time to digest it and continue to read up on these topics.
- the leading tone is a half step below a final/tonic
- half step movements in the diatonic scale have a strong sense of pull or movement
- resolution and important harmonic movements often involve half step movements
the strong sense of movement in the half steps or energy and tension, yes!
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
@Michael Curtis. I understood that the penultimate note should be one semitone from the final note. And I see why the Phrygian mode is special (because it is the only mode where the 2nd tone is one semi-tone away from the 1st tone). What is not clear to me, is why "if approaching from below the leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)". In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised. The exceptions are Ionian and Lydian modes, where going to the 1st note from bellow is already semi-tone.
– Roman
5 hours ago
"In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised." I think this may be the source of confusion. Let's used letters to be clearer. InE
Phrygian, the lower tone movementD
toE
does not need to be raised. You don't raise it because the single half step movement needed for the clausula vera is fulfilled by the other voice movingF
toE
. Basically in Phrygian the voice leading intervals of the clausula vera are inverted.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
Also, you should be careful with the exact wording "...the leading note should be raised..." we don't raise a leading tone. We raise a subtonic by half step to make it a leading tone.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
You could ask why the 2nd scale degree - the supertonic - is not lowered in Dorian and Aeolian to make a clausula vera. It would fulfill the basic definition. The only answer I can give to that is: historically it was not the convention.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Leading note (or tone) refers to the 7th note in the major scale. It's always one semitone below the root, which gives its name to the key. So, in key C, that note's B. Resolution is 'coming home comfortably'. Try playing some notes in key C, and stop on a B. It feels like you're nearly home, but need one more step. That's usually to C.And that's resolution, where tension gives way to a calmer feeling. Then it all feels at rest. That's why we call the B here the leading note, as it literally leads to the C.
The same idea works when we stop on D, the note above C. That needs to be resolved, which it does in a downward motion, D>C. As noted in your text. It's common in jazz to flatten that D to D&fat;, giving it a smaller route home to C.
It's also the reason why the harmonic and melodic minors use a different 7th note in their scales from the natural minor - they both use a sharpened leading note, so it works just as it does in major keys.
thanks for the answer. Do I get it right, "raised" means "to be played"? So, approaching final from below means that leading tone is played before the final. And do you also know why it is not the case for the "phrygian" mode?
– Roman
8 hours ago
No. 'Raised' means before, the note was a semitone lower than it is when raised. In key A minor, the 7th note is sometimes G (always in natural minr), but it often sounds like it's more effective when it's raised. To G#.
– Tim
8 hours ago
add a comment |
leading tone in melodies:
The leading tone effect is a pychological phenomen that you can hear and observe (detect) in a melody (melodic representation)
many tunes are ending so so la ti do, or do do do ti do and do re ti do. whereby the halfstep ti_do is the function of the 7_1 leading tone to the tonic. As Michael explains this "rule" has been developed in the modes of church chant and later by the Renaissance composers in the 16th century. In addition to Tim I want to emphasize that in that time it was not used to notate the alteration of the 7th step, it was up to the performers whether they would raise it to a leading tone in the dorian, aeolian and mixo lydian modes. I didn't live at that time but I was occupied by this questions the last days When did the aeolian mode change to the harmonic minor?.)
leading tone in harmony: harmonic representation
The function of a leading tone can't be explained without the psychological phenomens and terms of
energy and tension:
In all intervals there is a certain degree of dissonance and consonance. (Ernst Kurt)
e.g.:
a major 7th sounds sharply dissonant and has the tension to resolve into a perfect octave. This energy to resolve in a perfect interval is the tension of the leading tone to the final (tonic).
Another example is the suspended 4th of a major triad 1-3-5 as 4_3 resolving into a consonant third (Fa_Mi) notice: the final "Amen" or the clause fa-mi-re-mi.
The tritone Fa-Ti is also considered as dissonant (so far that it was the devils tone and forbidden - also in your exercises! ;)
in this interval of an augmented 4th is a maximum of tension: Ti leading to Do and Fa leading to Mi.
Initially, the leading-tone effect originates from the last step of the fundamental scale (e.g., B–C in the C major scale), whereby the sense of the critical approach to the goal, of direction, is bound with the seventh scale degree (B), and the sense of dissolution, resolution, is bound with the attainment of the fundamental tone, C, once more. The problem, initially in general terms, focuses on the entrance of an energetic moment that is given in a sounding [moment]. The transference from the sensation of drive to that of nearness is the psychologically basic function that has evolved in dynamic hearing. But with it, the essential is not exhausted; for it is available in two ways: in the drive in the leading tone, but also in its resolution, the leading tone step.
Ernst Kurth
in:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and Psychology
by
Daphne Tan
https://books.google.ch/books/about/Ernst_Kurth_at_the_Boundary_of_Music_The.html?id=9y00nQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
also available as Pdf:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and ... - UR Research
https://urresearch.rochester.edu/fileDownloadForInstitutionalItem.action?itemId..
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84178%2fwhat-is-leading-note-and-what-does-it-mean-to-raise-a-note%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Basically these are synonymous terms: "leads to" and "resolves."
A very important concept in tonal harmony is the strong sense of movement in the half steps of the diatonic scales. In solfege these are the tone pairs TI
to DO
and FA
to MI
.
Things can get confusing if we discuss the leading tone and resolution_and_ jump between different musical styles. You mentioned cantus firmus which suggests 16th century counterpoint, modal scales, and the species counterpoint teaching of Fux. In the 18th century homophonic style the leading tone and harmony have a different treatment with parts rooted in the older style. Let's look at the two separately. Just remember: two different styles, two different approaches.
16th century
The quote "...penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner..." is describing the clausula vera, the final cadence in 16th century style. The idea is the final tone - the tonic - should be approached by two voices in contrary motion one voice moving by a whole step and the other moving by a half step. When the final is approached from below by a half step that penultimate tone is the leading tone. The exact handling depends on the mode so let's just run through each mode.
In Ionian and Lydian modes the tones above and below the final are a whole step and a half step. Let's use C
as a final. The whole step above is D
and the half step below is B
. When B
and D
move to C
to end this is the clausula vera. The B
a half step below the C
is the leading tone.
In Dorian, Aeolian, and Mixolydian modes the tones above and below the final are both whole steps. Let's use D
as the final. The two whole steps are the E
above and the C
below. If we use those diatonic pitches and move C
and E
to D
to end it is not a clausula vera! One voice needs to be altered to make a movement by half step. The convention is to raise the tone below the final by a half step. This will make our C
become a C#
. This gives us the correct movement for a clausula vera and the C#
has become a leading tone (because it is one half step under the final.) Note: The unaltered tone a whole step below the final can be called the subtonic.
In Phrygian mode we have a unique situation. The tones above and below are a half step and a whole step. Instead of the half step being located under the final, it is located above the final. Technically we fulfill the definition of a clausula vera, because when the voices move to the final one moves by whole step and the other by half step. But we don't really have a proper leading tone below the tonic. The tone above is sort of like a leading tone. This half step approach from above give a unique flavor to the Phrygian mode the other modes don't have. To illustrate, let's use E
as the final. The half step above is F
and the whole step below is D
. When D
and F
move to E
we have a clausula vera without altering any tones with accidentals, but technically there is not a leading tone.
18th century
Briefly, let's consider 18th century harmony. During that time period the modes were no longer used. Instead harmony used the major/minor system. In that system we can shift the tonic around temporarily using tonicizations and modulations. Without going into too much detail, any diatonic major or minor chord in a given key can temporarily become the tonic. The root of such chords will become the temporary tonic, and the half step below that tone will be the temporary leading tone. For example, in C
major the chords D
minor, E
minor, F
major, G
major, and A
minor can all become temporary tonics. The tones a half step below each of those roots will be temporary leading tones - C#
to D
, D#
to E
, E
to F
, F#
to G
, and G#
to A
.
You can link the 18th century style back to the 16th century style by constructing a clausula vera to lead to any of those tonics. But in modern terminology we don't call it a clausula vera. Instead it is called a secondary or applied dominant and label them with Roman numeral analysis symbols. For example, the temporary leading tone move to D
in the key C
major would be labelled like: V6/ii
to ii
.
I packed a lot of theory into a very short description. Take time to digest it and continue to read up on these topics.
- the leading tone is a half step below a final/tonic
- half step movements in the diatonic scale have a strong sense of pull or movement
- resolution and important harmonic movements often involve half step movements
the strong sense of movement in the half steps or energy and tension, yes!
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
@Michael Curtis. I understood that the penultimate note should be one semitone from the final note. And I see why the Phrygian mode is special (because it is the only mode where the 2nd tone is one semi-tone away from the 1st tone). What is not clear to me, is why "if approaching from below the leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)". In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised. The exceptions are Ionian and Lydian modes, where going to the 1st note from bellow is already semi-tone.
– Roman
5 hours ago
"In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised." I think this may be the source of confusion. Let's used letters to be clearer. InE
Phrygian, the lower tone movementD
toE
does not need to be raised. You don't raise it because the single half step movement needed for the clausula vera is fulfilled by the other voice movingF
toE
. Basically in Phrygian the voice leading intervals of the clausula vera are inverted.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
Also, you should be careful with the exact wording "...the leading note should be raised..." we don't raise a leading tone. We raise a subtonic by half step to make it a leading tone.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
You could ask why the 2nd scale degree - the supertonic - is not lowered in Dorian and Aeolian to make a clausula vera. It would fulfill the basic definition. The only answer I can give to that is: historically it was not the convention.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Basically these are synonymous terms: "leads to" and "resolves."
A very important concept in tonal harmony is the strong sense of movement in the half steps of the diatonic scales. In solfege these are the tone pairs TI
to DO
and FA
to MI
.
Things can get confusing if we discuss the leading tone and resolution_and_ jump between different musical styles. You mentioned cantus firmus which suggests 16th century counterpoint, modal scales, and the species counterpoint teaching of Fux. In the 18th century homophonic style the leading tone and harmony have a different treatment with parts rooted in the older style. Let's look at the two separately. Just remember: two different styles, two different approaches.
16th century
The quote "...penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner..." is describing the clausula vera, the final cadence in 16th century style. The idea is the final tone - the tonic - should be approached by two voices in contrary motion one voice moving by a whole step and the other moving by a half step. When the final is approached from below by a half step that penultimate tone is the leading tone. The exact handling depends on the mode so let's just run through each mode.
In Ionian and Lydian modes the tones above and below the final are a whole step and a half step. Let's use C
as a final. The whole step above is D
and the half step below is B
. When B
and D
move to C
to end this is the clausula vera. The B
a half step below the C
is the leading tone.
In Dorian, Aeolian, and Mixolydian modes the tones above and below the final are both whole steps. Let's use D
as the final. The two whole steps are the E
above and the C
below. If we use those diatonic pitches and move C
and E
to D
to end it is not a clausula vera! One voice needs to be altered to make a movement by half step. The convention is to raise the tone below the final by a half step. This will make our C
become a C#
. This gives us the correct movement for a clausula vera and the C#
has become a leading tone (because it is one half step under the final.) Note: The unaltered tone a whole step below the final can be called the subtonic.
In Phrygian mode we have a unique situation. The tones above and below are a half step and a whole step. Instead of the half step being located under the final, it is located above the final. Technically we fulfill the definition of a clausula vera, because when the voices move to the final one moves by whole step and the other by half step. But we don't really have a proper leading tone below the tonic. The tone above is sort of like a leading tone. This half step approach from above give a unique flavor to the Phrygian mode the other modes don't have. To illustrate, let's use E
as the final. The half step above is F
and the whole step below is D
. When D
and F
move to E
we have a clausula vera without altering any tones with accidentals, but technically there is not a leading tone.
18th century
Briefly, let's consider 18th century harmony. During that time period the modes were no longer used. Instead harmony used the major/minor system. In that system we can shift the tonic around temporarily using tonicizations and modulations. Without going into too much detail, any diatonic major or minor chord in a given key can temporarily become the tonic. The root of such chords will become the temporary tonic, and the half step below that tone will be the temporary leading tone. For example, in C
major the chords D
minor, E
minor, F
major, G
major, and A
minor can all become temporary tonics. The tones a half step below each of those roots will be temporary leading tones - C#
to D
, D#
to E
, E
to F
, F#
to G
, and G#
to A
.
You can link the 18th century style back to the 16th century style by constructing a clausula vera to lead to any of those tonics. But in modern terminology we don't call it a clausula vera. Instead it is called a secondary or applied dominant and label them with Roman numeral analysis symbols. For example, the temporary leading tone move to D
in the key C
major would be labelled like: V6/ii
to ii
.
I packed a lot of theory into a very short description. Take time to digest it and continue to read up on these topics.
- the leading tone is a half step below a final/tonic
- half step movements in the diatonic scale have a strong sense of pull or movement
- resolution and important harmonic movements often involve half step movements
the strong sense of movement in the half steps or energy and tension, yes!
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
@Michael Curtis. I understood that the penultimate note should be one semitone from the final note. And I see why the Phrygian mode is special (because it is the only mode where the 2nd tone is one semi-tone away from the 1st tone). What is not clear to me, is why "if approaching from below the leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)". In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised. The exceptions are Ionian and Lydian modes, where going to the 1st note from bellow is already semi-tone.
– Roman
5 hours ago
"In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised." I think this may be the source of confusion. Let's used letters to be clearer. InE
Phrygian, the lower tone movementD
toE
does not need to be raised. You don't raise it because the single half step movement needed for the clausula vera is fulfilled by the other voice movingF
toE
. Basically in Phrygian the voice leading intervals of the clausula vera are inverted.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
Also, you should be careful with the exact wording "...the leading note should be raised..." we don't raise a leading tone. We raise a subtonic by half step to make it a leading tone.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
You could ask why the 2nd scale degree - the supertonic - is not lowered in Dorian and Aeolian to make a clausula vera. It would fulfill the basic definition. The only answer I can give to that is: historically it was not the convention.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Basically these are synonymous terms: "leads to" and "resolves."
A very important concept in tonal harmony is the strong sense of movement in the half steps of the diatonic scales. In solfege these are the tone pairs TI
to DO
and FA
to MI
.
Things can get confusing if we discuss the leading tone and resolution_and_ jump between different musical styles. You mentioned cantus firmus which suggests 16th century counterpoint, modal scales, and the species counterpoint teaching of Fux. In the 18th century homophonic style the leading tone and harmony have a different treatment with parts rooted in the older style. Let's look at the two separately. Just remember: two different styles, two different approaches.
16th century
The quote "...penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner..." is describing the clausula vera, the final cadence in 16th century style. The idea is the final tone - the tonic - should be approached by two voices in contrary motion one voice moving by a whole step and the other moving by a half step. When the final is approached from below by a half step that penultimate tone is the leading tone. The exact handling depends on the mode so let's just run through each mode.
In Ionian and Lydian modes the tones above and below the final are a whole step and a half step. Let's use C
as a final. The whole step above is D
and the half step below is B
. When B
and D
move to C
to end this is the clausula vera. The B
a half step below the C
is the leading tone.
In Dorian, Aeolian, and Mixolydian modes the tones above and below the final are both whole steps. Let's use D
as the final. The two whole steps are the E
above and the C
below. If we use those diatonic pitches and move C
and E
to D
to end it is not a clausula vera! One voice needs to be altered to make a movement by half step. The convention is to raise the tone below the final by a half step. This will make our C
become a C#
. This gives us the correct movement for a clausula vera and the C#
has become a leading tone (because it is one half step under the final.) Note: The unaltered tone a whole step below the final can be called the subtonic.
In Phrygian mode we have a unique situation. The tones above and below are a half step and a whole step. Instead of the half step being located under the final, it is located above the final. Technically we fulfill the definition of a clausula vera, because when the voices move to the final one moves by whole step and the other by half step. But we don't really have a proper leading tone below the tonic. The tone above is sort of like a leading tone. This half step approach from above give a unique flavor to the Phrygian mode the other modes don't have. To illustrate, let's use E
as the final. The half step above is F
and the whole step below is D
. When D
and F
move to E
we have a clausula vera without altering any tones with accidentals, but technically there is not a leading tone.
18th century
Briefly, let's consider 18th century harmony. During that time period the modes were no longer used. Instead harmony used the major/minor system. In that system we can shift the tonic around temporarily using tonicizations and modulations. Without going into too much detail, any diatonic major or minor chord in a given key can temporarily become the tonic. The root of such chords will become the temporary tonic, and the half step below that tone will be the temporary leading tone. For example, in C
major the chords D
minor, E
minor, F
major, G
major, and A
minor can all become temporary tonics. The tones a half step below each of those roots will be temporary leading tones - C#
to D
, D#
to E
, E
to F
, F#
to G
, and G#
to A
.
You can link the 18th century style back to the 16th century style by constructing a clausula vera to lead to any of those tonics. But in modern terminology we don't call it a clausula vera. Instead it is called a secondary or applied dominant and label them with Roman numeral analysis symbols. For example, the temporary leading tone move to D
in the key C
major would be labelled like: V6/ii
to ii
.
I packed a lot of theory into a very short description. Take time to digest it and continue to read up on these topics.
- the leading tone is a half step below a final/tonic
- half step movements in the diatonic scale have a strong sense of pull or movement
- resolution and important harmonic movements often involve half step movements
Basically these are synonymous terms: "leads to" and "resolves."
A very important concept in tonal harmony is the strong sense of movement in the half steps of the diatonic scales. In solfege these are the tone pairs TI
to DO
and FA
to MI
.
Things can get confusing if we discuss the leading tone and resolution_and_ jump between different musical styles. You mentioned cantus firmus which suggests 16th century counterpoint, modal scales, and the species counterpoint teaching of Fux. In the 18th century homophonic style the leading tone and harmony have a different treatment with parts rooted in the older style. Let's look at the two separately. Just remember: two different styles, two different approaches.
16th century
The quote "...penultimate note should go to the final in a stepwise manner..." is describing the clausula vera, the final cadence in 16th century style. The idea is the final tone - the tonic - should be approached by two voices in contrary motion one voice moving by a whole step and the other moving by a half step. When the final is approached from below by a half step that penultimate tone is the leading tone. The exact handling depends on the mode so let's just run through each mode.
In Ionian and Lydian modes the tones above and below the final are a whole step and a half step. Let's use C
as a final. The whole step above is D
and the half step below is B
. When B
and D
move to C
to end this is the clausula vera. The B
a half step below the C
is the leading tone.
In Dorian, Aeolian, and Mixolydian modes the tones above and below the final are both whole steps. Let's use D
as the final. The two whole steps are the E
above and the C
below. If we use those diatonic pitches and move C
and E
to D
to end it is not a clausula vera! One voice needs to be altered to make a movement by half step. The convention is to raise the tone below the final by a half step. This will make our C
become a C#
. This gives us the correct movement for a clausula vera and the C#
has become a leading tone (because it is one half step under the final.) Note: The unaltered tone a whole step below the final can be called the subtonic.
In Phrygian mode we have a unique situation. The tones above and below are a half step and a whole step. Instead of the half step being located under the final, it is located above the final. Technically we fulfill the definition of a clausula vera, because when the voices move to the final one moves by whole step and the other by half step. But we don't really have a proper leading tone below the tonic. The tone above is sort of like a leading tone. This half step approach from above give a unique flavor to the Phrygian mode the other modes don't have. To illustrate, let's use E
as the final. The half step above is F
and the whole step below is D
. When D
and F
move to E
we have a clausula vera without altering any tones with accidentals, but technically there is not a leading tone.
18th century
Briefly, let's consider 18th century harmony. During that time period the modes were no longer used. Instead harmony used the major/minor system. In that system we can shift the tonic around temporarily using tonicizations and modulations. Without going into too much detail, any diatonic major or minor chord in a given key can temporarily become the tonic. The root of such chords will become the temporary tonic, and the half step below that tone will be the temporary leading tone. For example, in C
major the chords D
minor, E
minor, F
major, G
major, and A
minor can all become temporary tonics. The tones a half step below each of those roots will be temporary leading tones - C#
to D
, D#
to E
, E
to F
, F#
to G
, and G#
to A
.
You can link the 18th century style back to the 16th century style by constructing a clausula vera to lead to any of those tonics. But in modern terminology we don't call it a clausula vera. Instead it is called a secondary or applied dominant and label them with Roman numeral analysis symbols. For example, the temporary leading tone move to D
in the key C
major would be labelled like: V6/ii
to ii
.
I packed a lot of theory into a very short description. Take time to digest it and continue to read up on these topics.
- the leading tone is a half step below a final/tonic
- half step movements in the diatonic scale have a strong sense of pull or movement
- resolution and important harmonic movements often involve half step movements
edited 5 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Michael CurtisMichael Curtis
12.6k946
12.6k946
the strong sense of movement in the half steps or energy and tension, yes!
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
@Michael Curtis. I understood that the penultimate note should be one semitone from the final note. And I see why the Phrygian mode is special (because it is the only mode where the 2nd tone is one semi-tone away from the 1st tone). What is not clear to me, is why "if approaching from below the leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)". In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised. The exceptions are Ionian and Lydian modes, where going to the 1st note from bellow is already semi-tone.
– Roman
5 hours ago
"In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised." I think this may be the source of confusion. Let's used letters to be clearer. InE
Phrygian, the lower tone movementD
toE
does not need to be raised. You don't raise it because the single half step movement needed for the clausula vera is fulfilled by the other voice movingF
toE
. Basically in Phrygian the voice leading intervals of the clausula vera are inverted.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
Also, you should be careful with the exact wording "...the leading note should be raised..." we don't raise a leading tone. We raise a subtonic by half step to make it a leading tone.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
You could ask why the 2nd scale degree - the supertonic - is not lowered in Dorian and Aeolian to make a clausula vera. It would fulfill the basic definition. The only answer I can give to that is: historically it was not the convention.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
the strong sense of movement in the half steps or energy and tension, yes!
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
@Michael Curtis. I understood that the penultimate note should be one semitone from the final note. And I see why the Phrygian mode is special (because it is the only mode where the 2nd tone is one semi-tone away from the 1st tone). What is not clear to me, is why "if approaching from below the leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)". In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised. The exceptions are Ionian and Lydian modes, where going to the 1st note from bellow is already semi-tone.
– Roman
5 hours ago
"In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised." I think this may be the source of confusion. Let's used letters to be clearer. InE
Phrygian, the lower tone movementD
toE
does not need to be raised. You don't raise it because the single half step movement needed for the clausula vera is fulfilled by the other voice movingF
toE
. Basically in Phrygian the voice leading intervals of the clausula vera are inverted.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
Also, you should be careful with the exact wording "...the leading note should be raised..." we don't raise a leading tone. We raise a subtonic by half step to make it a leading tone.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
You could ask why the 2nd scale degree - the supertonic - is not lowered in Dorian and Aeolian to make a clausula vera. It would fulfill the basic definition. The only answer I can give to that is: historically it was not the convention.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
the strong sense of movement in the half steps or energy and tension, yes!
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
the strong sense of movement in the half steps or energy and tension, yes!
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago
@Michael Curtis. I understood that the penultimate note should be one semitone from the final note. And I see why the Phrygian mode is special (because it is the only mode where the 2nd tone is one semi-tone away from the 1st tone). What is not clear to me, is why "if approaching from below the leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)". In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised. The exceptions are Ionian and Lydian modes, where going to the 1st note from bellow is already semi-tone.
– Roman
5 hours ago
@Michael Curtis. I understood that the penultimate note should be one semitone from the final note. And I see why the Phrygian mode is special (because it is the only mode where the 2nd tone is one semi-tone away from the 1st tone). What is not clear to me, is why "if approaching from below the leading note should be raised (except in the phrygian mode)". In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised. The exceptions are Ionian and Lydian modes, where going to the 1st note from bellow is already semi-tone.
– Roman
5 hours ago
"In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised." I think this may be the source of confusion. Let's used letters to be clearer. In
E
Phrygian, the lower tone movement D
to E
does not need to be raised. You don't raise it because the single half step movement needed for the clausula vera is fulfilled by the other voice moving F
to E
. Basically in Phrygian the voice leading intervals of the clausula vera are inverted.– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
"In Phrygian mode approaching the 1st note from bellow would be one tone and therefore the penultimate tone should be raised." I think this may be the source of confusion. Let's used letters to be clearer. In
E
Phrygian, the lower tone movement D
to E
does not need to be raised. You don't raise it because the single half step movement needed for the clausula vera is fulfilled by the other voice moving F
to E
. Basically in Phrygian the voice leading intervals of the clausula vera are inverted.– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
Also, you should be careful with the exact wording "...the leading note should be raised..." we don't raise a leading tone. We raise a subtonic by half step to make it a leading tone.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
Also, you should be careful with the exact wording "...the leading note should be raised..." we don't raise a leading tone. We raise a subtonic by half step to make it a leading tone.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
You could ask why the 2nd scale degree - the supertonic - is not lowered in Dorian and Aeolian to make a clausula vera. It would fulfill the basic definition. The only answer I can give to that is: historically it was not the convention.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
You could ask why the 2nd scale degree - the supertonic - is not lowered in Dorian and Aeolian to make a clausula vera. It would fulfill the basic definition. The only answer I can give to that is: historically it was not the convention.
– Michael Curtis
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Leading note (or tone) refers to the 7th note in the major scale. It's always one semitone below the root, which gives its name to the key. So, in key C, that note's B. Resolution is 'coming home comfortably'. Try playing some notes in key C, and stop on a B. It feels like you're nearly home, but need one more step. That's usually to C.And that's resolution, where tension gives way to a calmer feeling. Then it all feels at rest. That's why we call the B here the leading note, as it literally leads to the C.
The same idea works when we stop on D, the note above C. That needs to be resolved, which it does in a downward motion, D>C. As noted in your text. It's common in jazz to flatten that D to D&fat;, giving it a smaller route home to C.
It's also the reason why the harmonic and melodic minors use a different 7th note in their scales from the natural minor - they both use a sharpened leading note, so it works just as it does in major keys.
thanks for the answer. Do I get it right, "raised" means "to be played"? So, approaching final from below means that leading tone is played before the final. And do you also know why it is not the case for the "phrygian" mode?
– Roman
8 hours ago
No. 'Raised' means before, the note was a semitone lower than it is when raised. In key A minor, the 7th note is sometimes G (always in natural minr), but it often sounds like it's more effective when it's raised. To G#.
– Tim
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Leading note (or tone) refers to the 7th note in the major scale. It's always one semitone below the root, which gives its name to the key. So, in key C, that note's B. Resolution is 'coming home comfortably'. Try playing some notes in key C, and stop on a B. It feels like you're nearly home, but need one more step. That's usually to C.And that's resolution, where tension gives way to a calmer feeling. Then it all feels at rest. That's why we call the B here the leading note, as it literally leads to the C.
The same idea works when we stop on D, the note above C. That needs to be resolved, which it does in a downward motion, D>C. As noted in your text. It's common in jazz to flatten that D to D&fat;, giving it a smaller route home to C.
It's also the reason why the harmonic and melodic minors use a different 7th note in their scales from the natural minor - they both use a sharpened leading note, so it works just as it does in major keys.
thanks for the answer. Do I get it right, "raised" means "to be played"? So, approaching final from below means that leading tone is played before the final. And do you also know why it is not the case for the "phrygian" mode?
– Roman
8 hours ago
No. 'Raised' means before, the note was a semitone lower than it is when raised. In key A minor, the 7th note is sometimes G (always in natural minr), but it often sounds like it's more effective when it's raised. To G#.
– Tim
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Leading note (or tone) refers to the 7th note in the major scale. It's always one semitone below the root, which gives its name to the key. So, in key C, that note's B. Resolution is 'coming home comfortably'. Try playing some notes in key C, and stop on a B. It feels like you're nearly home, but need one more step. That's usually to C.And that's resolution, where tension gives way to a calmer feeling. Then it all feels at rest. That's why we call the B here the leading note, as it literally leads to the C.
The same idea works when we stop on D, the note above C. That needs to be resolved, which it does in a downward motion, D>C. As noted in your text. It's common in jazz to flatten that D to D&fat;, giving it a smaller route home to C.
It's also the reason why the harmonic and melodic minors use a different 7th note in their scales from the natural minor - they both use a sharpened leading note, so it works just as it does in major keys.
Leading note (or tone) refers to the 7th note in the major scale. It's always one semitone below the root, which gives its name to the key. So, in key C, that note's B. Resolution is 'coming home comfortably'. Try playing some notes in key C, and stop on a B. It feels like you're nearly home, but need one more step. That's usually to C.And that's resolution, where tension gives way to a calmer feeling. Then it all feels at rest. That's why we call the B here the leading note, as it literally leads to the C.
The same idea works when we stop on D, the note above C. That needs to be resolved, which it does in a downward motion, D>C. As noted in your text. It's common in jazz to flatten that D to D&fat;, giving it a smaller route home to C.
It's also the reason why the harmonic and melodic minors use a different 7th note in their scales from the natural minor - they both use a sharpened leading note, so it works just as it does in major keys.
answered 8 hours ago
TimTim
106k10107270
106k10107270
thanks for the answer. Do I get it right, "raised" means "to be played"? So, approaching final from below means that leading tone is played before the final. And do you also know why it is not the case for the "phrygian" mode?
– Roman
8 hours ago
No. 'Raised' means before, the note was a semitone lower than it is when raised. In key A minor, the 7th note is sometimes G (always in natural minr), but it often sounds like it's more effective when it's raised. To G#.
– Tim
8 hours ago
add a comment |
thanks for the answer. Do I get it right, "raised" means "to be played"? So, approaching final from below means that leading tone is played before the final. And do you also know why it is not the case for the "phrygian" mode?
– Roman
8 hours ago
No. 'Raised' means before, the note was a semitone lower than it is when raised. In key A minor, the 7th note is sometimes G (always in natural minr), but it often sounds like it's more effective when it's raised. To G#.
– Tim
8 hours ago
thanks for the answer. Do I get it right, "raised" means "to be played"? So, approaching final from below means that leading tone is played before the final. And do you also know why it is not the case for the "phrygian" mode?
– Roman
8 hours ago
thanks for the answer. Do I get it right, "raised" means "to be played"? So, approaching final from below means that leading tone is played before the final. And do you also know why it is not the case for the "phrygian" mode?
– Roman
8 hours ago
No. 'Raised' means before, the note was a semitone lower than it is when raised. In key A minor, the 7th note is sometimes G (always in natural minr), but it often sounds like it's more effective when it's raised. To G#.
– Tim
8 hours ago
No. 'Raised' means before, the note was a semitone lower than it is when raised. In key A minor, the 7th note is sometimes G (always in natural minr), but it often sounds like it's more effective when it's raised. To G#.
– Tim
8 hours ago
add a comment |
leading tone in melodies:
The leading tone effect is a pychological phenomen that you can hear and observe (detect) in a melody (melodic representation)
many tunes are ending so so la ti do, or do do do ti do and do re ti do. whereby the halfstep ti_do is the function of the 7_1 leading tone to the tonic. As Michael explains this "rule" has been developed in the modes of church chant and later by the Renaissance composers in the 16th century. In addition to Tim I want to emphasize that in that time it was not used to notate the alteration of the 7th step, it was up to the performers whether they would raise it to a leading tone in the dorian, aeolian and mixo lydian modes. I didn't live at that time but I was occupied by this questions the last days When did the aeolian mode change to the harmonic minor?.)
leading tone in harmony: harmonic representation
The function of a leading tone can't be explained without the psychological phenomens and terms of
energy and tension:
In all intervals there is a certain degree of dissonance and consonance. (Ernst Kurt)
e.g.:
a major 7th sounds sharply dissonant and has the tension to resolve into a perfect octave. This energy to resolve in a perfect interval is the tension of the leading tone to the final (tonic).
Another example is the suspended 4th of a major triad 1-3-5 as 4_3 resolving into a consonant third (Fa_Mi) notice: the final "Amen" or the clause fa-mi-re-mi.
The tritone Fa-Ti is also considered as dissonant (so far that it was the devils tone and forbidden - also in your exercises! ;)
in this interval of an augmented 4th is a maximum of tension: Ti leading to Do and Fa leading to Mi.
Initially, the leading-tone effect originates from the last step of the fundamental scale (e.g., B–C in the C major scale), whereby the sense of the critical approach to the goal, of direction, is bound with the seventh scale degree (B), and the sense of dissolution, resolution, is bound with the attainment of the fundamental tone, C, once more. The problem, initially in general terms, focuses on the entrance of an energetic moment that is given in a sounding [moment]. The transference from the sensation of drive to that of nearness is the psychologically basic function that has evolved in dynamic hearing. But with it, the essential is not exhausted; for it is available in two ways: in the drive in the leading tone, but also in its resolution, the leading tone step.
Ernst Kurth
in:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and Psychology
by
Daphne Tan
https://books.google.ch/books/about/Ernst_Kurth_at_the_Boundary_of_Music_The.html?id=9y00nQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
also available as Pdf:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and ... - UR Research
https://urresearch.rochester.edu/fileDownloadForInstitutionalItem.action?itemId..
add a comment |
leading tone in melodies:
The leading tone effect is a pychological phenomen that you can hear and observe (detect) in a melody (melodic representation)
many tunes are ending so so la ti do, or do do do ti do and do re ti do. whereby the halfstep ti_do is the function of the 7_1 leading tone to the tonic. As Michael explains this "rule" has been developed in the modes of church chant and later by the Renaissance composers in the 16th century. In addition to Tim I want to emphasize that in that time it was not used to notate the alteration of the 7th step, it was up to the performers whether they would raise it to a leading tone in the dorian, aeolian and mixo lydian modes. I didn't live at that time but I was occupied by this questions the last days When did the aeolian mode change to the harmonic minor?.)
leading tone in harmony: harmonic representation
The function of a leading tone can't be explained without the psychological phenomens and terms of
energy and tension:
In all intervals there is a certain degree of dissonance and consonance. (Ernst Kurt)
e.g.:
a major 7th sounds sharply dissonant and has the tension to resolve into a perfect octave. This energy to resolve in a perfect interval is the tension of the leading tone to the final (tonic).
Another example is the suspended 4th of a major triad 1-3-5 as 4_3 resolving into a consonant third (Fa_Mi) notice: the final "Amen" or the clause fa-mi-re-mi.
The tritone Fa-Ti is also considered as dissonant (so far that it was the devils tone and forbidden - also in your exercises! ;)
in this interval of an augmented 4th is a maximum of tension: Ti leading to Do and Fa leading to Mi.
Initially, the leading-tone effect originates from the last step of the fundamental scale (e.g., B–C in the C major scale), whereby the sense of the critical approach to the goal, of direction, is bound with the seventh scale degree (B), and the sense of dissolution, resolution, is bound with the attainment of the fundamental tone, C, once more. The problem, initially in general terms, focuses on the entrance of an energetic moment that is given in a sounding [moment]. The transference from the sensation of drive to that of nearness is the psychologically basic function that has evolved in dynamic hearing. But with it, the essential is not exhausted; for it is available in two ways: in the drive in the leading tone, but also in its resolution, the leading tone step.
Ernst Kurth
in:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and Psychology
by
Daphne Tan
https://books.google.ch/books/about/Ernst_Kurth_at_the_Boundary_of_Music_The.html?id=9y00nQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
also available as Pdf:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and ... - UR Research
https://urresearch.rochester.edu/fileDownloadForInstitutionalItem.action?itemId..
add a comment |
leading tone in melodies:
The leading tone effect is a pychological phenomen that you can hear and observe (detect) in a melody (melodic representation)
many tunes are ending so so la ti do, or do do do ti do and do re ti do. whereby the halfstep ti_do is the function of the 7_1 leading tone to the tonic. As Michael explains this "rule" has been developed in the modes of church chant and later by the Renaissance composers in the 16th century. In addition to Tim I want to emphasize that in that time it was not used to notate the alteration of the 7th step, it was up to the performers whether they would raise it to a leading tone in the dorian, aeolian and mixo lydian modes. I didn't live at that time but I was occupied by this questions the last days When did the aeolian mode change to the harmonic minor?.)
leading tone in harmony: harmonic representation
The function of a leading tone can't be explained without the psychological phenomens and terms of
energy and tension:
In all intervals there is a certain degree of dissonance and consonance. (Ernst Kurt)
e.g.:
a major 7th sounds sharply dissonant and has the tension to resolve into a perfect octave. This energy to resolve in a perfect interval is the tension of the leading tone to the final (tonic).
Another example is the suspended 4th of a major triad 1-3-5 as 4_3 resolving into a consonant third (Fa_Mi) notice: the final "Amen" or the clause fa-mi-re-mi.
The tritone Fa-Ti is also considered as dissonant (so far that it was the devils tone and forbidden - also in your exercises! ;)
in this interval of an augmented 4th is a maximum of tension: Ti leading to Do and Fa leading to Mi.
Initially, the leading-tone effect originates from the last step of the fundamental scale (e.g., B–C in the C major scale), whereby the sense of the critical approach to the goal, of direction, is bound with the seventh scale degree (B), and the sense of dissolution, resolution, is bound with the attainment of the fundamental tone, C, once more. The problem, initially in general terms, focuses on the entrance of an energetic moment that is given in a sounding [moment]. The transference from the sensation of drive to that of nearness is the psychologically basic function that has evolved in dynamic hearing. But with it, the essential is not exhausted; for it is available in two ways: in the drive in the leading tone, but also in its resolution, the leading tone step.
Ernst Kurth
in:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and Psychology
by
Daphne Tan
https://books.google.ch/books/about/Ernst_Kurth_at_the_Boundary_of_Music_The.html?id=9y00nQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
also available as Pdf:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and ... - UR Research
https://urresearch.rochester.edu/fileDownloadForInstitutionalItem.action?itemId..
leading tone in melodies:
The leading tone effect is a pychological phenomen that you can hear and observe (detect) in a melody (melodic representation)
many tunes are ending so so la ti do, or do do do ti do and do re ti do. whereby the halfstep ti_do is the function of the 7_1 leading tone to the tonic. As Michael explains this "rule" has been developed in the modes of church chant and later by the Renaissance composers in the 16th century. In addition to Tim I want to emphasize that in that time it was not used to notate the alteration of the 7th step, it was up to the performers whether they would raise it to a leading tone in the dorian, aeolian and mixo lydian modes. I didn't live at that time but I was occupied by this questions the last days When did the aeolian mode change to the harmonic minor?.)
leading tone in harmony: harmonic representation
The function of a leading tone can't be explained without the psychological phenomens and terms of
energy and tension:
In all intervals there is a certain degree of dissonance and consonance. (Ernst Kurt)
e.g.:
a major 7th sounds sharply dissonant and has the tension to resolve into a perfect octave. This energy to resolve in a perfect interval is the tension of the leading tone to the final (tonic).
Another example is the suspended 4th of a major triad 1-3-5 as 4_3 resolving into a consonant third (Fa_Mi) notice: the final "Amen" or the clause fa-mi-re-mi.
The tritone Fa-Ti is also considered as dissonant (so far that it was the devils tone and forbidden - also in your exercises! ;)
in this interval of an augmented 4th is a maximum of tension: Ti leading to Do and Fa leading to Mi.
Initially, the leading-tone effect originates from the last step of the fundamental scale (e.g., B–C in the C major scale), whereby the sense of the critical approach to the goal, of direction, is bound with the seventh scale degree (B), and the sense of dissolution, resolution, is bound with the attainment of the fundamental tone, C, once more. The problem, initially in general terms, focuses on the entrance of an energetic moment that is given in a sounding [moment]. The transference from the sensation of drive to that of nearness is the psychologically basic function that has evolved in dynamic hearing. But with it, the essential is not exhausted; for it is available in two ways: in the drive in the leading tone, but also in its resolution, the leading tone step.
Ernst Kurth
in:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and Psychology
by
Daphne Tan
https://books.google.ch/books/about/Ernst_Kurth_at_the_Boundary_of_Music_The.html?id=9y00nQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
also available as Pdf:
Ernst Kurth at the Boundary of Music Theory and ... - UR Research
https://urresearch.rochester.edu/fileDownloadForInstitutionalItem.action?itemId..
edited 5 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli
5,1451420
5,1451420
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84178%2fwhat-is-leading-note-and-what-does-it-mean-to-raise-a-note%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
this question is related to my question of some days ago which is not yet fully answered: music.stackexchange.com/questions/82936/…. Mind that these rules for cantus firmus by Lindsay Davidson cited by Fux' Gradus ad Parnassum are a mix of several centuries and for a style of strict counterpoint that never has been written by composers - except in exercices of students.
– Albrecht Hügli
6 hours ago