Gsyfuy

What's the "normal" opposite of flautando?

is there any evidence to suggest that tamper resistant receptacles (trr's) are safer?

How are showroom/display vehicles prepared?

Signed and unsigned numbers

How can The Temple of Elementary Evil reliably protect itself against kinetic bombardment?

When a wind turbine does not produce enough electricity how does the power company compensate for the loss?

NASA's RS-25 Engines shut down time

How many characters using PHB rules does it take to be able to have access to any PHB spell at the start of an adventuring day?

Was Luke Skywalker the leader of the Rebel forces on Hoth?

List elements digit difference sort

finite abelian groups tensor product.

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

How to fix the Unknown Command error caused by starting CmdInit.cmd using TCC/LE?

How does NOW work?

What was the Kree's motivation in Captain Marvel?

Conservation of Mass and Energy

Difference on montgomery curve equation between EFD and RFC7748

Shifting between bemols (flats) and diesis (sharps)in the key signature

PTIJ: wiping amalek’s memory?

Why the color red for the Republican Party

Reversed Sudoku

What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?

At what distance can a bugbear, holding a reach weapon, with Polearm Mastery, get their Opportunity Attack?

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

A Tag-Friendly Word or Phrase Expressing Failure to Communicate Meaning Due to Word Choice

One who expresses (or the act of) feigned sympathy/interest in hopes of being recognized for itI'm looking for a word that means “Intended for particular use”Ricky Gervais used an odd word like benign but about being complacent in a group discussionIs there a word for turning something into a competition?What is another word for 'being exposed to'?Seeking word meaning a fear of failureBetter alternative for MythologyWord for common knowledge in a scientific setting?Adjective for attractiveness of a sidewalk with regards to the movement of people through it?A single word for deliberately bad

2

I'm a member over at IPS.SE and we are trying to think of how to word a new tag for questions. The phenomenon we are trying to describe is failure to convey an intended idea to a given audience because the speaker is using vocabulary that the audience happens not to know. The assumed context is that both parties share the same effective language (no foreign translations, obscure dialects, or regionalisms are presumed to be present). The issue includes use of technical jargon, but is not limited to that.

The most popular proposed tag (as of my writing this, at least) is 'communication-noise', referencing the idea of a signal-to-noise ratio. I'm being difficult in that I'm not convinced that's the best fit, but I can't think of anything that is clearer and similarly succinct.

The main elements to express are:

• The intended meaning not being understood by the hearer




• The reason for this failure being related to the speaker's word choice (that is, it's not a matter of blaming the hearer)

Ideally, the word or phrase chosen will not itself have too much jargon-ish character, but since the tag will come with an accessible description that's not a hard requirement.

single-word-requests

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Upper_Case

asked 5 hours ago

Upper_CaseUpper_Case

79328

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Assume the writer is using the unknown vocabulary correctly, "failure to convey an intended idea to a given audience because the speaker is using vocabulary that the audience happens not to know" sounds like a description of jargon. That word has obviously crossed your mind, so you must have decided it doesn't fit. Why not?
  
  – Juhasz
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  'Jargon' was also my first though from the Q..
  
  – TrevorD
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Juhasz Mainly because 'jargon' typically (as I use it) refers to domain-specific knowledge which an ordinary person would not be expected to know (like, say, 'deictic'). The issue described here includes more "ordinary" knowledge like the phrase "immune system", which I would expect a random English-speaker to understand.
  
  – Upper_Case
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I don't like the "noise" idea, which is about unnecessary not uncomprehended communication. "Jargon" is good and covers a broader area too.
  
  – Weather Vane
  4 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

I'm a member over at IPS.SE and we are trying to think of how to word a new tag for questions. The phenomenon we are trying to describe is failure to convey an intended idea to a given audience because the speaker is using vocabulary that the audience happens not to know. The assumed context is that both parties share the same effective language (no foreign translations, obscure dialects, or regionalisms are presumed to be present). The issue includes use of technical jargon, but is not limited to that.

The most popular proposed tag (as of my writing this, at least) is 'communication-noise', referencing the idea of a signal-to-noise ratio. I'm being difficult in that I'm not convinced that's the best fit, but I can't think of anything that is clearer and similarly succinct.

The main elements to express are:

• The intended meaning not being understood by the hearer




• The reason for this failure being related to the speaker's word choice (that is, it's not a matter of blaming the hearer)

Ideally, the word or phrase chosen will not itself have too much jargon-ish character, but since the tag will come with an accessible description that's not a hard requirement.

single-word-requests

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Upper_Case

asked 5 hours ago

Upper_CaseUpper_Case

79328

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Assume the writer is using the unknown vocabulary correctly, "failure to convey an intended idea to a given audience because the speaker is using vocabulary that the audience happens not to know" sounds like a description of jargon. That word has obviously crossed your mind, so you must have decided it doesn't fit. Why not?
  
  – Juhasz
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  'Jargon' was also my first though from the Q..
  
  – TrevorD
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Juhasz Mainly because 'jargon' typically (as I use it) refers to domain-specific knowledge which an ordinary person would not be expected to know (like, say, 'deictic'). The issue described here includes more "ordinary" knowledge like the phrase "immune system", which I would expect a random English-speaker to understand.
  
  – Upper_Case
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I don't like the "noise" idea, which is about unnecessary not uncomprehended communication. "Jargon" is good and covers a broader area too.
  
  – Weather Vane
  4 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I'm a member over at IPS.SE and we are trying to think of how to word a new tag for questions. The phenomenon we are trying to describe is failure to convey an intended idea to a given audience because the speaker is using vocabulary that the audience happens not to know. The assumed context is that both parties share the same effective language (no foreign translations, obscure dialects, or regionalisms are presumed to be present). The issue includes use of technical jargon, but is not limited to that.

The most popular proposed tag (as of my writing this, at least) is 'communication-noise', referencing the idea of a signal-to-noise ratio. I'm being difficult in that I'm not convinced that's the best fit, but I can't think of anything that is clearer and similarly succinct.

The main elements to express are:

• The intended meaning not being understood by the hearer




• The reason for this failure being related to the speaker's word choice (that is, it's not a matter of blaming the hearer)

Ideally, the word or phrase chosen will not itself have too much jargon-ish character, but since the tag will come with an accessible description that's not a hard requirement.

single-word-requests

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Upper_Case

asked 5 hours ago

Upper_CaseUpper_Case

79328

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Upper_Case

asked 5 hours ago

Upper_CaseUpper_Case

79328

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Upper_Case

asked 5 hours ago

Upper_CaseUpper_Case

79328

asked 5 hours ago

Upper_CaseUpper_Case

79328

asked 5 hours ago

Upper_CaseUpper_Case

79328

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

I think your word may actually be "Jargon." While as a noun it can mean:

Applied contemptuously to any mode of speech abounding in unfamiliar terms, or peculiar to a particular set of persons, as the language of scholars or philosophers, the terminology of a science or art, or the cant of a class, sect, trade, or profession.

the word can also be used as a verb!

transitive. To utter in a jargon; to prate about in a jargon.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

scohe001scohe001

2,4171121

add a comment | 

1

Inadvertent Obfuscation feels like a good choice to me, if it's not too belaboured.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

RogerRoger

89629

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489238%2fa-tag-friendly-word-or-phrase-expressing-failure-to-communicate-meaning-due-to-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

I think your word may actually be "Jargon." While as a noun it can mean:

Applied contemptuously to any mode of speech abounding in unfamiliar terms, or peculiar to a particular set of persons, as the language of scholars or philosophers, the terminology of a science or art, or the cant of a class, sect, trade, or profession.

the word can also be used as a verb!

transitive. To utter in a jargon; to prate about in a jargon.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

scohe001scohe001

2,4171121

add a comment | 

2

I think your word may actually be "Jargon." While as a noun it can mean:

Applied contemptuously to any mode of speech abounding in unfamiliar terms, or peculiar to a particular set of persons, as the language of scholars or philosophers, the terminology of a science or art, or the cant of a class, sect, trade, or profession.

the word can also be used as a verb!

transitive. To utter in a jargon; to prate about in a jargon.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

scohe001scohe001

2,4171121

add a comment | 

I think your word may actually be "Jargon." While as a noun it can mean:

Applied contemptuously to any mode of speech abounding in unfamiliar terms, or peculiar to a particular set of persons, as the language of scholars or philosophers, the terminology of a science or art, or the cant of a class, sect, trade, or profession.

the word can also be used as a verb!

transitive. To utter in a jargon; to prate about in a jargon.

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

scohe001scohe001

2,4171121

share|improve this answer

answered 5 hours ago

scohe001scohe001

2,4171121

answered 5 hours ago

scohe001scohe001

2,4171121

answered 5 hours ago

scohe001scohe001

2,4171121

1

Inadvertent Obfuscation feels like a good choice to me, if it's not too belaboured.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

RogerRoger

89629

add a comment | 

1

Inadvertent Obfuscation feels like a good choice to me, if it's not too belaboured.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

RogerRoger

89629

add a comment | 

Inadvertent Obfuscation feels like a good choice to me, if it's not too belaboured.

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

RogerRoger

89629

share|improve this answer

answered 4 hours ago

RogerRoger

89629

answered 4 hours ago

RogerRoger

89629

answered 4 hours ago

RogerRoger

89629