How does a predictive coding aid in lossless compression?Lossless Video Compression PipelineCompressing...

When (not how or why) to calculate Big O of an algorithm

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

Forming a German sentence with/without the verb at the end

How to add frame around section using titlesec?

Which is the best way to check return result?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

Is it logically or scientifically possible to artificially send energy to the body?

Why do bosons tend to occupy the same state?

Short story with a alien planet, government officials must wear exploding medallions

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

What are some good books on Machine Learning and AI like Krugman, Wells and Graddy's "Essentials of Economics"

Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?

What killed these X2 caps?

Is this a hacking script in function.php?

Should I cover my bicycle overnight while bikepacking?

Bullying boss launched a smear campaign and made me unemployable

Determining Impedance With An Antenna Analyzer

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

ssTTsSTtRrriinInnnnNNNIiinngg

Arrow those variables!



How does a predictive coding aid in lossless compression?


Lossless Video Compression PipelineCompressing normally distributed dataHow can GIF compression be lossless if the maximum # of colors is 256?Hash for verifying both compressed and uncompressed data?Can random suitless $52$ playing card data be compressed to approach, match, or even beat entropy encoding storage? If so, how?Arithmetic coding and “the optimal compression ratio”How does adaptative Huffman coding (Vitter algorithm) work?Universal Lossless Compression?Is von Neumann's randomness in sin quote no longer applicable?Algorithm for estimating lossless compression factor













2












$begingroup$


I'm working on this lab where we need to apply a lossless predictive coding to an image before compressing it (with Huffman, or some other lossless compression algorithm).



From the example seen below, it's pretty clear that by pre-processing the image with predictive coding, we've modified its histogram and concentrated all of its grey levels around 0. But why exactly does this aid compression?



Is there maybe a formula to determine the compression rate of Huffman, knowing the standard deviation and entropy of the original image? Otherwise, why would the compression ratio be any different; it's not like the range of values has changed between the original image and pre-processed image.





Thank you in advance,



Liam.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I'm working on this lab where we need to apply a lossless predictive coding to an image before compressing it (with Huffman, or some other lossless compression algorithm).



    From the example seen below, it's pretty clear that by pre-processing the image with predictive coding, we've modified its histogram and concentrated all of its grey levels around 0. But why exactly does this aid compression?



    Is there maybe a formula to determine the compression rate of Huffman, knowing the standard deviation and entropy of the original image? Otherwise, why would the compression ratio be any different; it's not like the range of values has changed between the original image and pre-processed image.





    Thank you in advance,



    Liam.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I'm working on this lab where we need to apply a lossless predictive coding to an image before compressing it (with Huffman, or some other lossless compression algorithm).



      From the example seen below, it's pretty clear that by pre-processing the image with predictive coding, we've modified its histogram and concentrated all of its grey levels around 0. But why exactly does this aid compression?



      Is there maybe a formula to determine the compression rate of Huffman, knowing the standard deviation and entropy of the original image? Otherwise, why would the compression ratio be any different; it's not like the range of values has changed between the original image and pre-processed image.





      Thank you in advance,



      Liam.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm working on this lab where we need to apply a lossless predictive coding to an image before compressing it (with Huffman, or some other lossless compression algorithm).



      From the example seen below, it's pretty clear that by pre-processing the image with predictive coding, we've modified its histogram and concentrated all of its grey levels around 0. But why exactly does this aid compression?



      Is there maybe a formula to determine the compression rate of Huffman, knowing the standard deviation and entropy of the original image? Otherwise, why would the compression ratio be any different; it's not like the range of values has changed between the original image and pre-processed image.





      Thank you in advance,



      Liam.







      image-processing data-compression huffman-coding






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      Liam F-ALiam F-A

      161




      161






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Huffman coding, as usually applied, only considers the distribution of singletons. If $X$ is the distribution of a random singleton, then Huffman coding uses between $H(X)$ and $H(X)+1$ bits per singleton, where $H(cdot)$ is the (log 2) entropy function.



          In contrast, predictive coding can take into account correlations across data points. As a simple example, consider the following sequence:
          $$
          0,1,2,ldots,255,0,1,2,ldots,255,ldots
          $$

          Huffman coding would use 8 bits per unit of data, whereas with predictive coding we could get potentially to $O(log n)$ bits for the entire sequence.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "419"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106450%2fhow-does-a-predictive-coding-aid-in-lossless-compression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Huffman coding, as usually applied, only considers the distribution of singletons. If $X$ is the distribution of a random singleton, then Huffman coding uses between $H(X)$ and $H(X)+1$ bits per singleton, where $H(cdot)$ is the (log 2) entropy function.



            In contrast, predictive coding can take into account correlations across data points. As a simple example, consider the following sequence:
            $$
            0,1,2,ldots,255,0,1,2,ldots,255,ldots
            $$

            Huffman coding would use 8 bits per unit of data, whereas with predictive coding we could get potentially to $O(log n)$ bits for the entire sequence.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              Huffman coding, as usually applied, only considers the distribution of singletons. If $X$ is the distribution of a random singleton, then Huffman coding uses between $H(X)$ and $H(X)+1$ bits per singleton, where $H(cdot)$ is the (log 2) entropy function.



              In contrast, predictive coding can take into account correlations across data points. As a simple example, consider the following sequence:
              $$
              0,1,2,ldots,255,0,1,2,ldots,255,ldots
              $$

              Huffman coding would use 8 bits per unit of data, whereas with predictive coding we could get potentially to $O(log n)$ bits for the entire sequence.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Huffman coding, as usually applied, only considers the distribution of singletons. If $X$ is the distribution of a random singleton, then Huffman coding uses between $H(X)$ and $H(X)+1$ bits per singleton, where $H(cdot)$ is the (log 2) entropy function.



                In contrast, predictive coding can take into account correlations across data points. As a simple example, consider the following sequence:
                $$
                0,1,2,ldots,255,0,1,2,ldots,255,ldots
                $$

                Huffman coding would use 8 bits per unit of data, whereas with predictive coding we could get potentially to $O(log n)$ bits for the entire sequence.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Huffman coding, as usually applied, only considers the distribution of singletons. If $X$ is the distribution of a random singleton, then Huffman coding uses between $H(X)$ and $H(X)+1$ bits per singleton, where $H(cdot)$ is the (log 2) entropy function.



                In contrast, predictive coding can take into account correlations across data points. As a simple example, consider the following sequence:
                $$
                0,1,2,ldots,255,0,1,2,ldots,255,ldots
                $$

                Huffman coding would use 8 bits per unit of data, whereas with predictive coding we could get potentially to $O(log n)$ bits for the entire sequence.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                Yuval FilmusYuval Filmus

                196k15184349




                196k15184349






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106450%2fhow-does-a-predictive-coding-aid-in-lossless-compression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    迭戈·戈丁...

                    A phrase ”follow into" in a context The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are...

                    1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer...