Concept of linear mappings are confusing meChange of Basis ConfusionProve that a linear map for complex...
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
Why is an old chain unsafe?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
How long does it take to type this?
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?
Shell script can be run only with sh command
Concept of linear mappings are confusing me
What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
What Brexit solution does the DUP want?
How to add power-LED to my small amplifier?
Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted
The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server
Why is this code 6.5x slower with optimizations enabled?
How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
I see my dog run
If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?
What would the Romans have called "sorcery"?
How is this relation reflexive?
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
Concept of linear mappings are confusing me
Change of Basis ConfusionProve that a linear map for complex polynomials is diagonalizableEigenvalues of three given linear operatorsTransforming coordinate system vs objectsCan an $ntimes n$ matrix be reduced to a smaller matrix in any sense?Overview of Linear AlgebraLinear Transformation vs MatrixPruning SubsetsChange of basis formula - intuition/is this true?Linear Algebra:Vector Space
$begingroup$
I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.
Thanks!
linear-algebra
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.
Thanks!
linear-algebra
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
43 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.
Thanks!
linear-algebra
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
$endgroup$
I'm so confused on how we can have a 2x3 matrix A, multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$ and then end up with a vector in $Bbb R^2$. Is it possible to visualize this at all or do I need to sort of blindly accept this concept as facts that I'll accept and use?
Can someone give a very brief summarization on why this makes sense? Because I just see it as, in a world (dimension) in $Bbb R^3$, we multiply it by a vector in $Bbb R^3$, and out pops a vector in $Bbb R^2$.
Thanks!
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
asked 58 mins ago
mingming
4306
4306
1
$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
43 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
43 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
43 mins ago
$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
43 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.
You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbb{R}^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbb{R}^2$ this way, for example:
$$
(x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
$$
Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
$$
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 0 & 1 \
3 & 4 & 0
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
5\
11
end{bmatrix}.
$$
You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.
So it will map a line to a line or ${0}$, a plane to a plane, a line, or ${0}$, and so on.
By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179032%2fconcept-of-linear-mappings-are-confusing-me%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.
You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbb{R}^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbb{R}^2$ this way, for example:
$$
(x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
$$
Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
$$
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 0 & 1 \
3 & 4 & 0
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
5\
11
end{bmatrix}.
$$
You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.
You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbb{R}^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbb{R}^2$ this way, for example:
$$
(x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
$$
Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
$$
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 0 & 1 \
3 & 4 & 0
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
5\
11
end{bmatrix}.
$$
You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.
You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbb{R}^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbb{R}^2$ this way, for example:
$$
(x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
$$
Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
$$
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 0 & 1 \
3 & 4 & 0
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
5\
11
end{bmatrix}.
$$
You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
$endgroup$
For the moment don't think about multiplication and matrices.
You can imagine starting from a vector $(x,y,z)$ in $mathbb{R}^3$ and mapping it to a vector in $mathbb{R}^2$ this way, for example:
$$
(x, y, z) mapsto (2x+ z, 3x+ 4y).
$$
Mathematicians have invented a nice clean way to write that map. It's the formalism you've learned for matrix multiplication. To see what $(1,2,3)$ maps to, calculate the matrix product
$$
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 0 & 1 \
3 & 4 & 0
end{bmatrix}
begin{bmatrix}
1 \
2 \
3
end{bmatrix}
=
begin{bmatrix}
5\
11
end{bmatrix}.
$$
You will soon be comfortable with this, just as you are now with whatever algorithm you were taught for ordinary multiplication. Then you will be free to focus on understanding what maps like this are useful for.
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
answered 43 mins ago
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
45.8k553120
45.8k553120
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.
So it will map a line to a line or ${0}$, a plane to a plane, a line, or ${0}$, and so on.
By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.
So it will map a line to a line or ${0}$, a plane to a plane, a line, or ${0}$, and so on.
By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.
So it will map a line to a line or ${0}$, a plane to a plane, a line, or ${0}$, and so on.
By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
$endgroup$
A linear mapping has the property that it maps subspaces to subspaces.
So it will map a line to a line or ${0}$, a plane to a plane, a line, or ${0}$, and so on.
By definition, linear mappings “play nice” with addition and scaling. These properties allow us to reduce statements about entire vector spaces down to bases, which are quite “small” in the finite dimensional case.
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
answered 33 mins ago
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
108k12103253
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179032%2fconcept-of-linear-mappings-are-confusing-me%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
maybe think of multiplying a matrix by a vector as a special case of multiplying a matrix by a matrix
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Is it the definition of matrix multiplication that gives you trouble? Have you tried doing a multiplication and seeing what you get? Do you understand that we can have a function like $f(x,y,z)=(x-2y+z, 2x+4y-z)$ which maps $mathbb R^3$ to $mathbb R^2$?
$endgroup$
– John Douma
43 mins ago