Magento 1.9.3.0 product page design is reverted to base/default The Next CEO of Stack...
I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin
How does the mv command work with external drives?
How to safely derail a train during transit?
Are there any limitations on attacking while grappling?
If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?
How do I reset passwords on multiple websites easily?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Bold, vivid family
Can I run my washing machine drain line into a condensate pump so it drains better?
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
If/When UK leaves the EU, can a future goverment conduct a referendum to join the EU?
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Rotate a column
Complex fractions
sp_blitzCache results Memory grants
Novel about a guy who is possessed by the divine essence and the world ends?
Real integral using residue theorem - why doesn't this work?
Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?
What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?
Magento 1.9.3.0 product page design is reverted to base/default
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDoes Magento have a fallback for default email templates?Magento custom theme to default theme redirection issueWhy does Magento show the default 'favicon.ico' when template path hints are enabled?Custom option templates (radio, checkbox, etc) for a single product)Old themes in the Design configuration page of Magento 2?home page goes back to default when changing storeMagento 2.1 mobile product page doesn't scrollSub Category product can't be view in the product pageMagento Product Page LayoutError in product page, Magento 2.3
I have a Magento 1.9.3.0 test shop for which I've created a new theme based on rwd
. This shop uses a database that's been cloned from the production environment (Magento 1.8.1.0). Everything works very well except this weird bug:
When I visit a product view page the package/theme gets reverted to base/default
from rwd/myCustom
.
If I go in Admin and edit the product I was looking at earlier and just hit "Save" or "Save and continue" even without making any change, then refresh the product page again, the correct theme appears (rwd/myCustom
)
I don't have many products (~50) so I could just manually go through them and "fix" them but I am more curious what causes this.
- None of the products have a custom design set.
- I've cleared cache, re-indexed a bunch of times so it's not that.
- I've checked under Systems > Design and there's are no entries there.
- I've tried a mass attribute update (Select All > Actions: Update
Attributes > Change an attribute for all products > Save) but that
doesn't seem to fix anything. - Logs (magento & apache) show nothing when accessing "bugged" product
pages
Programatically loading and saving a product doesn't fix it.
product-page theme-fallback magento1.9.3.0
add a comment |
I have a Magento 1.9.3.0 test shop for which I've created a new theme based on rwd
. This shop uses a database that's been cloned from the production environment (Magento 1.8.1.0). Everything works very well except this weird bug:
When I visit a product view page the package/theme gets reverted to base/default
from rwd/myCustom
.
If I go in Admin and edit the product I was looking at earlier and just hit "Save" or "Save and continue" even without making any change, then refresh the product page again, the correct theme appears (rwd/myCustom
)
I don't have many products (~50) so I could just manually go through them and "fix" them but I am more curious what causes this.
- None of the products have a custom design set.
- I've cleared cache, re-indexed a bunch of times so it's not that.
- I've checked under Systems > Design and there's are no entries there.
- I've tried a mass attribute update (Select All > Actions: Update
Attributes > Change an attribute for all products > Save) but that
doesn't seem to fix anything. - Logs (magento & apache) show nothing when accessing "bugged" product
pages
Programatically loading and saving a product doesn't fix it.
product-page theme-fallback magento1.9.3.0
as you are talking about the hitting save and it solves the issue, you still have indexing issues, although you reindexed seems still the tables were not indexed correctly.
– Nickool
Oct 20 '16 at 22:59
add a comment |
I have a Magento 1.9.3.0 test shop for which I've created a new theme based on rwd
. This shop uses a database that's been cloned from the production environment (Magento 1.8.1.0). Everything works very well except this weird bug:
When I visit a product view page the package/theme gets reverted to base/default
from rwd/myCustom
.
If I go in Admin and edit the product I was looking at earlier and just hit "Save" or "Save and continue" even without making any change, then refresh the product page again, the correct theme appears (rwd/myCustom
)
I don't have many products (~50) so I could just manually go through them and "fix" them but I am more curious what causes this.
- None of the products have a custom design set.
- I've cleared cache, re-indexed a bunch of times so it's not that.
- I've checked under Systems > Design and there's are no entries there.
- I've tried a mass attribute update (Select All > Actions: Update
Attributes > Change an attribute for all products > Save) but that
doesn't seem to fix anything. - Logs (magento & apache) show nothing when accessing "bugged" product
pages
Programatically loading and saving a product doesn't fix it.
product-page theme-fallback magento1.9.3.0
I have a Magento 1.9.3.0 test shop for which I've created a new theme based on rwd
. This shop uses a database that's been cloned from the production environment (Magento 1.8.1.0). Everything works very well except this weird bug:
When I visit a product view page the package/theme gets reverted to base/default
from rwd/myCustom
.
If I go in Admin and edit the product I was looking at earlier and just hit "Save" or "Save and continue" even without making any change, then refresh the product page again, the correct theme appears (rwd/myCustom
)
I don't have many products (~50) so I could just manually go through them and "fix" them but I am more curious what causes this.
- None of the products have a custom design set.
- I've cleared cache, re-indexed a bunch of times so it's not that.
- I've checked under Systems > Design and there's are no entries there.
- I've tried a mass attribute update (Select All > Actions: Update
Attributes > Change an attribute for all products > Save) but that
doesn't seem to fix anything. - Logs (magento & apache) show nothing when accessing "bugged" product
pages
Programatically loading and saving a product doesn't fix it.
product-page theme-fallback magento1.9.3.0
product-page theme-fallback magento1.9.3.0
edited 10 mins ago
Teja Bhagavan Kollepara
3,01241949
3,01241949
asked Oct 20 '16 at 22:33
Alexandru BangalăAlexandru Bangală
518
518
as you are talking about the hitting save and it solves the issue, you still have indexing issues, although you reindexed seems still the tables were not indexed correctly.
– Nickool
Oct 20 '16 at 22:59
add a comment |
as you are talking about the hitting save and it solves the issue, you still have indexing issues, although you reindexed seems still the tables were not indexed correctly.
– Nickool
Oct 20 '16 at 22:59
as you are talking about the hitting save and it solves the issue, you still have indexing issues, although you reindexed seems still the tables were not indexed correctly.
– Nickool
Oct 20 '16 at 22:59
as you are talking about the hitting save and it solves the issue, you still have indexing issues, although you reindexed seems still the tables were not indexed correctly.
– Nickool
Oct 20 '16 at 22:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I just figured it out!
Notes:
The old (production) site is running a package called oldtheme
.
The new (development) site is running a theme called myCustom
under the rwd
package.
After digging through app/code/core/Mage/Core/Model/Design/Package.php
and logging the designPackageExists
function with Mage::log
I've noticed that Magento was looking for an oldtheme
package instead of rwd
.
I did a search in the database and revealed that under catalog_product_entity_varchar
there were a bunch of entries with the oldtheme/default
value.
I tracked the entry's entity_type_id
in the eav_attributes
table and found that its corresponded to the custom_design
attribute (even though non of the products had a custom design set for any of the store views).
The fix was removing the offending entries from catalog_product_entity_varchar
.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "479"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmagento.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141930%2fmagento-1-9-3-0-product-page-design-is-reverted-to-base-default%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I just figured it out!
Notes:
The old (production) site is running a package called oldtheme
.
The new (development) site is running a theme called myCustom
under the rwd
package.
After digging through app/code/core/Mage/Core/Model/Design/Package.php
and logging the designPackageExists
function with Mage::log
I've noticed that Magento was looking for an oldtheme
package instead of rwd
.
I did a search in the database and revealed that under catalog_product_entity_varchar
there were a bunch of entries with the oldtheme/default
value.
I tracked the entry's entity_type_id
in the eav_attributes
table and found that its corresponded to the custom_design
attribute (even though non of the products had a custom design set for any of the store views).
The fix was removing the offending entries from catalog_product_entity_varchar
.
add a comment |
I just figured it out!
Notes:
The old (production) site is running a package called oldtheme
.
The new (development) site is running a theme called myCustom
under the rwd
package.
After digging through app/code/core/Mage/Core/Model/Design/Package.php
and logging the designPackageExists
function with Mage::log
I've noticed that Magento was looking for an oldtheme
package instead of rwd
.
I did a search in the database and revealed that under catalog_product_entity_varchar
there were a bunch of entries with the oldtheme/default
value.
I tracked the entry's entity_type_id
in the eav_attributes
table and found that its corresponded to the custom_design
attribute (even though non of the products had a custom design set for any of the store views).
The fix was removing the offending entries from catalog_product_entity_varchar
.
add a comment |
I just figured it out!
Notes:
The old (production) site is running a package called oldtheme
.
The new (development) site is running a theme called myCustom
under the rwd
package.
After digging through app/code/core/Mage/Core/Model/Design/Package.php
and logging the designPackageExists
function with Mage::log
I've noticed that Magento was looking for an oldtheme
package instead of rwd
.
I did a search in the database and revealed that under catalog_product_entity_varchar
there were a bunch of entries with the oldtheme/default
value.
I tracked the entry's entity_type_id
in the eav_attributes
table and found that its corresponded to the custom_design
attribute (even though non of the products had a custom design set for any of the store views).
The fix was removing the offending entries from catalog_product_entity_varchar
.
I just figured it out!
Notes:
The old (production) site is running a package called oldtheme
.
The new (development) site is running a theme called myCustom
under the rwd
package.
After digging through app/code/core/Mage/Core/Model/Design/Package.php
and logging the designPackageExists
function with Mage::log
I've noticed that Magento was looking for an oldtheme
package instead of rwd
.
I did a search in the database and revealed that under catalog_product_entity_varchar
there were a bunch of entries with the oldtheme/default
value.
I tracked the entry's entity_type_id
in the eav_attributes
table and found that its corresponded to the custom_design
attribute (even though non of the products had a custom design set for any of the store views).
The fix was removing the offending entries from catalog_product_entity_varchar
.
answered Oct 23 '16 at 23:57
Alexandru BangalăAlexandru Bangală
518
518
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Magento Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmagento.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141930%2fmagento-1-9-3-0-product-page-design-is-reverted-to-base-default%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
as you are talking about the hitting save and it solves the issue, you still have indexing issues, although you reindexed seems still the tables were not indexed correctly.
– Nickool
Oct 20 '16 at 22:59