How can a large fleets maintain formation in interstellar space?How close to interstellar space travel could...

Crontab: Ubuntu running script (noob)

Why does photorec keep finding files after I have filled the disk free space as root?

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

How much mayhem could I cause as a sentient fish?

After checking in online, how do I know whether I need to go show my passport at airport check-in?

Does dispel magic end a master's control over their undead?

What to look for when criticizing poetry?

Can I announce prefix 161.117.25.0/24 even though I don't have all of /24 IPs?

Why don't key signatures indicate the tonic?

Why do cars have plastic shrouds over the engine?

Has any human ever had the choice to leave Earth permanently?

False written accusations not made public - is there law to cover this?

"We can't save the customer" error after Migration - Magento 2.3

Is there any risk in sharing info about technologies and products we use with a supplier?

Differences between prior distribution and prior predictive distribution?

Alien invasion to probe us, why?

With regard to distributive law of inner product in vector algebra

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

What makes papers publishable in top-tier journals?

Play Zip, Zap, Zop

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

Why publish a research paper when a blog post or a lecture slide can have more citation count than a journal paper?

Why didn't Tom Riddle take the presence of Fawkes and the Sorting Hat as more of a threat?



How can a large fleets maintain formation in interstellar space?


How close to interstellar space travel could humans get in the near future?Could large space ships land safelyHow far can we go? (Space travels)How does a large starship maintain orbit while running in low power mode?How would a large Space battleship be powered?How to survive the G-force of Space TravelHow do you detect a rock in interstellar space?Could a large radio telescope survive interstellar spaceflight?How well will interstellar ploughs work?Why would space fleets be aligned?













2












$begingroup$


Earth is under attack, the empire has gathered thousands of battleships each has a displacement of 500,000 metric tonnes and 20 motherships with a displacement of over 15 million metric tonnes now heading towards Earth as we speak. They are groups in a tight formation around a shield generator which put up a powerful force field the size of our moon orbit and can keep out asteroids and incoming missiles. I suppose traveling at subluminal speed across large distance of space, these fleets would be attracted to each other gravitationally and hence such a tight formation is disastrous. Is there any way to overcome this problem and still maintain a tight formation around the shield generator? The emperor has restricted the budget so there can only be 1 shield generator for the entire fleet, propulsion are antimatter-matter engine and ion drive (no FTL). The plan is to overwhelm Earth defences at one go, second wave commencing at later time is the finisher but no shield generator.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Displacement makes sense for water ships. Since space is in a vacuum, what exactly is being displaced?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch: actually nothing the empire still used that term but it is referring to the mass of the vessel.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


Earth is under attack, the empire has gathered thousands of battleships each has a displacement of 500,000 metric tonnes and 20 motherships with a displacement of over 15 million metric tonnes now heading towards Earth as we speak. They are groups in a tight formation around a shield generator which put up a powerful force field the size of our moon orbit and can keep out asteroids and incoming missiles. I suppose traveling at subluminal speed across large distance of space, these fleets would be attracted to each other gravitationally and hence such a tight formation is disastrous. Is there any way to overcome this problem and still maintain a tight formation around the shield generator? The emperor has restricted the budget so there can only be 1 shield generator for the entire fleet, propulsion are antimatter-matter engine and ion drive (no FTL). The plan is to overwhelm Earth defences at one go, second wave commencing at later time is the finisher but no shield generator.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Displacement makes sense for water ships. Since space is in a vacuum, what exactly is being displaced?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch: actually nothing the empire still used that term but it is referring to the mass of the vessel.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Earth is under attack, the empire has gathered thousands of battleships each has a displacement of 500,000 metric tonnes and 20 motherships with a displacement of over 15 million metric tonnes now heading towards Earth as we speak. They are groups in a tight formation around a shield generator which put up a powerful force field the size of our moon orbit and can keep out asteroids and incoming missiles. I suppose traveling at subluminal speed across large distance of space, these fleets would be attracted to each other gravitationally and hence such a tight formation is disastrous. Is there any way to overcome this problem and still maintain a tight formation around the shield generator? The emperor has restricted the budget so there can only be 1 shield generator for the entire fleet, propulsion are antimatter-matter engine and ion drive (no FTL). The plan is to overwhelm Earth defences at one go, second wave commencing at later time is the finisher but no shield generator.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Earth is under attack, the empire has gathered thousands of battleships each has a displacement of 500,000 metric tonnes and 20 motherships with a displacement of over 15 million metric tonnes now heading towards Earth as we speak. They are groups in a tight formation around a shield generator which put up a powerful force field the size of our moon orbit and can keep out asteroids and incoming missiles. I suppose traveling at subluminal speed across large distance of space, these fleets would be attracted to each other gravitationally and hence such a tight formation is disastrous. Is there any way to overcome this problem and still maintain a tight formation around the shield generator? The emperor has restricted the budget so there can only be 1 shield generator for the entire fleet, propulsion are antimatter-matter engine and ion drive (no FTL). The plan is to overwhelm Earth defences at one go, second wave commencing at later time is the finisher but no shield generator.







space-travel spaceships






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









user6760user6760

12.5k1470150




12.5k1470150












  • $begingroup$
    Displacement makes sense for water ships. Since space is in a vacuum, what exactly is being displaced?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch: actually nothing the empire still used that term but it is referring to the mass of the vessel.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Displacement makes sense for water ships. Since space is in a vacuum, what exactly is being displaced?
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch: actually nothing the empire still used that term but it is referring to the mass of the vessel.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Displacement makes sense for water ships. Since space is in a vacuum, what exactly is being displaced?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Displacement makes sense for water ships. Since space is in a vacuum, what exactly is being displaced?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
@L.Dutch: actually nothing the empire still used that term but it is referring to the mass of the vessel.
$endgroup$
– user6760
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@L.Dutch: actually nothing the empire still used that term but it is referring to the mass of the vessel.
$endgroup$
– user6760
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

I don't see why a tight formation would necessarily be disasterous. Gravity is an incredibly weak force, so the attraction even massive vessels feel towards each other will be minimal- small, occasional corrections should be more than enough to correct for this drift.



I imagine that compared to gravity, matching the speed and direction of each ship with respect to each other accurately will be much more significant. Even then, for a high-tech fleet this shouldn't be a problem. The ships would probably use some sort of PID control linked to the engines of each to manage the distances between the ship in the fleet, and its nearest neighbours- much like how cruise control allows a car to match the speed of a car in front of a motorway, however in 3 dimensions instead of 1.



Alternatively, if there's some central command that knows the position of every ship in the fleet, the position of each ship could be monitored and micromanaged to ensure the correct formation is kept- however from a signals intelligence point of view, this requires all ships broadcasting their position which means the signals could potentially be intercepted.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Hi I was reading on how a heavy spacecraft can pull a planet killer(asteriod) gravitationally enough to derail it in it's collision course with Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    If you mean derail the asteroid's collision with earth, I imagine that would be because if the asteroid is far away enough, tiny alterations to its trajectory would cause it to miss. The asteriod has no means of correcting its orbit which is why this could potentially work.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

If you put those masses in the equation for gravitational force, you will see that the resulting force is negligible.



A 500,000 metric tonnes ship and a 15 million metric tonnes ship will attract each other with a force of 500 N at a distance of 1 km.



That gives $1 cdot 10^{-6} m/s^2$ acceleration to the lightest ship.



Not zero, but surely manageable.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140208%2fhow-can-a-large-fleets-maintain-formation-in-interstellar-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    I don't see why a tight formation would necessarily be disasterous. Gravity is an incredibly weak force, so the attraction even massive vessels feel towards each other will be minimal- small, occasional corrections should be more than enough to correct for this drift.



    I imagine that compared to gravity, matching the speed and direction of each ship with respect to each other accurately will be much more significant. Even then, for a high-tech fleet this shouldn't be a problem. The ships would probably use some sort of PID control linked to the engines of each to manage the distances between the ship in the fleet, and its nearest neighbours- much like how cruise control allows a car to match the speed of a car in front of a motorway, however in 3 dimensions instead of 1.



    Alternatively, if there's some central command that knows the position of every ship in the fleet, the position of each ship could be monitored and micromanaged to ensure the correct formation is kept- however from a signals intelligence point of view, this requires all ships broadcasting their position which means the signals could potentially be intercepted.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Hi I was reading on how a heavy spacecraft can pull a planet killer(asteriod) gravitationally enough to derail it in it's collision course with Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – user6760
      4 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      If you mean derail the asteroid's collision with earth, I imagine that would be because if the asteroid is far away enough, tiny alterations to its trajectory would cause it to miss. The asteriod has no means of correcting its orbit which is why this could potentially work.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      4 hours ago
















    5












    $begingroup$

    I don't see why a tight formation would necessarily be disasterous. Gravity is an incredibly weak force, so the attraction even massive vessels feel towards each other will be minimal- small, occasional corrections should be more than enough to correct for this drift.



    I imagine that compared to gravity, matching the speed and direction of each ship with respect to each other accurately will be much more significant. Even then, for a high-tech fleet this shouldn't be a problem. The ships would probably use some sort of PID control linked to the engines of each to manage the distances between the ship in the fleet, and its nearest neighbours- much like how cruise control allows a car to match the speed of a car in front of a motorway, however in 3 dimensions instead of 1.



    Alternatively, if there's some central command that knows the position of every ship in the fleet, the position of each ship could be monitored and micromanaged to ensure the correct formation is kept- however from a signals intelligence point of view, this requires all ships broadcasting their position which means the signals could potentially be intercepted.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Hi I was reading on how a heavy spacecraft can pull a planet killer(asteriod) gravitationally enough to derail it in it's collision course with Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – user6760
      4 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      If you mean derail the asteroid's collision with earth, I imagine that would be because if the asteroid is far away enough, tiny alterations to its trajectory would cause it to miss. The asteriod has no means of correcting its orbit which is why this could potentially work.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      4 hours ago














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    I don't see why a tight formation would necessarily be disasterous. Gravity is an incredibly weak force, so the attraction even massive vessels feel towards each other will be minimal- small, occasional corrections should be more than enough to correct for this drift.



    I imagine that compared to gravity, matching the speed and direction of each ship with respect to each other accurately will be much more significant. Even then, for a high-tech fleet this shouldn't be a problem. The ships would probably use some sort of PID control linked to the engines of each to manage the distances between the ship in the fleet, and its nearest neighbours- much like how cruise control allows a car to match the speed of a car in front of a motorway, however in 3 dimensions instead of 1.



    Alternatively, if there's some central command that knows the position of every ship in the fleet, the position of each ship could be monitored and micromanaged to ensure the correct formation is kept- however from a signals intelligence point of view, this requires all ships broadcasting their position which means the signals could potentially be intercepted.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    I don't see why a tight formation would necessarily be disasterous. Gravity is an incredibly weak force, so the attraction even massive vessels feel towards each other will be minimal- small, occasional corrections should be more than enough to correct for this drift.



    I imagine that compared to gravity, matching the speed and direction of each ship with respect to each other accurately will be much more significant. Even then, for a high-tech fleet this shouldn't be a problem. The ships would probably use some sort of PID control linked to the engines of each to manage the distances between the ship in the fleet, and its nearest neighbours- much like how cruise control allows a car to match the speed of a car in front of a motorway, however in 3 dimensions instead of 1.



    Alternatively, if there's some central command that knows the position of every ship in the fleet, the position of each ship could be monitored and micromanaged to ensure the correct formation is kept- however from a signals intelligence point of view, this requires all ships broadcasting their position which means the signals could potentially be intercepted.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 4 hours ago









    JackJack

    4614




    4614




    New contributor




    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • $begingroup$
      Hi I was reading on how a heavy spacecraft can pull a planet killer(asteriod) gravitationally enough to derail it in it's collision course with Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – user6760
      4 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      If you mean derail the asteroid's collision with earth, I imagine that would be because if the asteroid is far away enough, tiny alterations to its trajectory would cause it to miss. The asteriod has no means of correcting its orbit which is why this could potentially work.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      4 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Hi I was reading on how a heavy spacecraft can pull a planet killer(asteriod) gravitationally enough to derail it in it's collision course with Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – user6760
      4 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      If you mean derail the asteroid's collision with earth, I imagine that would be because if the asteroid is far away enough, tiny alterations to its trajectory would cause it to miss. The asteriod has no means of correcting its orbit which is why this could potentially work.
      $endgroup$
      – Jack
      4 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Hi I was reading on how a heavy spacecraft can pull a planet killer(asteriod) gravitationally enough to derail it in it's collision course with Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    Hi I was reading on how a heavy spacecraft can pull a planet killer(asteriod) gravitationally enough to derail it in it's collision course with Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – user6760
    4 hours ago














    $begingroup$
    If you mean derail the asteroid's collision with earth, I imagine that would be because if the asteroid is far away enough, tiny alterations to its trajectory would cause it to miss. The asteriod has no means of correcting its orbit which is why this could potentially work.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    If you mean derail the asteroid's collision with earth, I imagine that would be because if the asteroid is far away enough, tiny alterations to its trajectory would cause it to miss. The asteriod has no means of correcting its orbit which is why this could potentially work.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack
    4 hours ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    If you put those masses in the equation for gravitational force, you will see that the resulting force is negligible.



    A 500,000 metric tonnes ship and a 15 million metric tonnes ship will attract each other with a force of 500 N at a distance of 1 km.



    That gives $1 cdot 10^{-6} m/s^2$ acceleration to the lightest ship.



    Not zero, but surely manageable.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      If you put those masses in the equation for gravitational force, you will see that the resulting force is negligible.



      A 500,000 metric tonnes ship and a 15 million metric tonnes ship will attract each other with a force of 500 N at a distance of 1 km.



      That gives $1 cdot 10^{-6} m/s^2$ acceleration to the lightest ship.



      Not zero, but surely manageable.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        If you put those masses in the equation for gravitational force, you will see that the resulting force is negligible.



        A 500,000 metric tonnes ship and a 15 million metric tonnes ship will attract each other with a force of 500 N at a distance of 1 km.



        That gives $1 cdot 10^{-6} m/s^2$ acceleration to the lightest ship.



        Not zero, but surely manageable.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If you put those masses in the equation for gravitational force, you will see that the resulting force is negligible.



        A 500,000 metric tonnes ship and a 15 million metric tonnes ship will attract each other with a force of 500 N at a distance of 1 km.



        That gives $1 cdot 10^{-6} m/s^2$ acceleration to the lightest ship.



        Not zero, but surely manageable.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        L.DutchL.Dutch

        85.3k28201416




        85.3k28201416






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140208%2fhow-can-a-large-fleets-maintain-formation-in-interstellar-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            “%fieldName is a required field.”, in Magento2 REST API Call for GET Method Type The Next...

            How to change City field to a dropdown in Checkout step Magento 2Magento 2 : How to change UI field(s)...

            變成蝙蝠會怎樣? 參考資料 外部連結 导航菜单Thomas Nagel, "What is it like to be a...