Is this a typo in Section 1.8.1 Mathematics for Computer Science?How can I learn about proofs for computer...
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
Combinatorics problem, right solution?
Trouble removing package using Yum on CentOS7
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
All ASCII characters with a given bit count
Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?
Multiple fireplaces in an apartment building?
Cayley's Matrix Notation
What to do with someone that cheated their way through university and a PhD program?
Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?
What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?
Is this a typo in Section 1.8.1 Mathematics for Computer Science?
Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?
I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?
Injection into a proper class and choice without regularity
How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile
Find the identical rows in a matrix
How to have a sharp product image?
How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish
A Note on N!
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Is this a typo in Section 1.8.1 Mathematics for Computer Science?
How can I learn about proofs for computer science?How can I start to learn proof theory?Proving the existence of a proof without actually giving a proofProof by well ordering: Every positive integer greater than one can be factored as a product of primes.Gentzen and computer scienceElegant demonstration with minimum category theory knowledgeDifferent definitions of Natural Numbers and Proof by ContradictionProve $3^{2n}-5$ is a multiple of $4$Defining new symbols in a proof, when is this justified?Prove convergence rate to zero increases as n increases
$begingroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
$endgroup$
Am I completely mistake or is it suppose to say $n^2$ is a multiple of 2 and therefore $n$ must be a multiple of 4?
This is from MIT's Mathematics for Computer Science
proof-explanation proof-theory
proof-explanation proof-theory
asked 5 hours ago
doctopusdoctopus
1413
1413
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3202666%2fis-this-a-typo-in-section-1-8-1-mathematics-for-computer-science%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
$endgroup$
No. $6^2$ is a multiple of $2$ but $6$ is not a multiple of $4$. If $n=2k$ then for sure $n^2=4k^2$. So, MIT is right.
answered 5 hours ago
RandallRandall
10.9k11431
10.9k11431
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
$endgroup$
No, it is correct. The point is that $2d^2=n^2$ implies $n^2$ is even, and only even numbers square to give an even number, so $n$ much be even, so $n^2$ is then actually a multiple of $4$.
answered 5 hours ago
John DoeJohn Doe
12.2k11341
12.2k11341
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3202666%2fis-this-a-typo-in-section-1-8-1-mathematics-for-computer-science%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Generally: If $m,n$ are positive integers and $m^{1/n}$ is not an integer then $m^{1/n}$ is irrational. Proved by a similar method.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
4 hours ago