Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators...
Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country
What to do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos' actions in Infinity War
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
How can mimic phobia be cured?
putting logo on same line but after title, latex
What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?
What is Cash Advance APR?
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
How to say when an application is taking the half of your screen on a computer
Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?
Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?
Can a college of swords bard use blade flourish on an OA from dissonant whispers?
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?
System.QueryException unexpected token
User Story breakdown - Technical Task + User Feature
Calculating total slots
Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density?
Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character
Multiplicative persistence
Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?
About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators in C++ for custom objectsDoes delete call the destructor?Overloading operator delete in a base classWhen is %destructor invoked in BISON?Why should C++ programmers minimize use of 'new'?Why is ::operator new[] necessary when ::operator new is enough?Why am I permitted to declare an object with a deleted destructor?Does delete[] deallocate memory in one shot after invoking destructors?Why are non-placement `new` and `delete` built into the language and not just regular functions?Why deallocation function is not called when object constructor throw in a new expression?
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
edited 2 hours ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
195k35382470
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
asked 2 hours ago
thbthb
8,66932355
8,66932355
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
edited 2 hours ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
24.4k33281
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
answered 2 hours ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
103k12215280
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
