An unused reference in research paperPublishing Same Research Paper on a National Conference as well as...
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
What is Cash Advance APR?
putting logo on same line but after title, latex
Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?
Calculate sum of polynomial roots
Is aluminum electrical wire used on aircraft?
How to cover method return statement in Apex Class?
Using substitution ciphers to generate new alphabets in a novel
Add big quotation marks inside my colorbox
What are the advantages of simplicial model categories over non-simplicial ones?
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
What are the balance implications behind making invisible things auto-hide?
Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density
How does a computer interpret real numbers?
User Story breakdown - Technical Task + User Feature
Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?
Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?
Terse Method to Swap Lowest for Highest?
Why "had" in "[something] we would have made had we used [something]"?
Redundant comparison & "if" before assignment
Calculating total slots
Multiplicative persistence
An unused reference in research paper
Publishing Same Research Paper on a National Conference as well as International IEEE conferenceChanging the title of a research paper before the submission of the camera-ready versionWhat will happen to my paper if the status of the accepted paper is “AAR” in a IEEE conferenceShould the distinction between bibliography and reference be maintained when writing a paper?How much can you trust a reference of a paper that is not availableDo I need to add answers to the reviewers’ comments to a conference paper?At what stage should acknowledgements be inserted into the paper if review is not double-blind?Performing minor corrections in a paper after camera-ready deadlineIs it ok to write a follow-up paper for a paper which has been accepted but not available online yet?References must be cited vs. need not be cited
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference
section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
New contributor
add a comment |
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference
section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
New contributor
add a comment |
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference
section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
New contributor
I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference
section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:
This result1 is cited from [1].
This result2 is cited from [4].
In reference section
[1] cited from here
[2] cited from here
[3] cited from here
[4] cited from here
But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.
Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?
publications
publications
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
Azor Ahai
4,76411841
4,76411841
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
Gopal ojhaGopal ojha
1114
1114
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
15 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126914%2fan-unused-reference-in-research-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
add a comment |
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
add a comment |
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.
Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.
Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.
Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.
I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.
answered 5 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
54k16175268
54k16175268
add a comment |
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
15 mins ago
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
15 mins ago
add a comment |
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).
answered 3 hours ago
henninghenning
18.4k46495
18.4k46495
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
15 mins ago
add a comment |
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
15 mins ago
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
15 mins ago
Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.
– Jon Custer
15 mins ago
add a comment |
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126914%2fan-unused-reference-in-research-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown