Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a “socialist”?Why is communism considered as evil (like...

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

Does a paladin have to announce that they're using Divine Smite before attacking?

What senses are available to a corpse subjected to a Speak with Dead spell?

Does the ditching switch allow an A320 to float indefinitely?

Can we "borrow" our answers to populate our own websites?

Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night

What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?

Custom shape shows unwanted extra line

Plausible reason for gold-digging ant

Methods for writing a code review

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Why is the size of a directory either 0 or 4096?

Stuck on a Geometry Puzzle

Why is 'diphthong' pronounced the way it is?

Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?

Potential client has a problematic employee I can't work with

Does Skippy chunky peanut butter contain trans fat?

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

How do you funnel food off a cutting board?

Is there a file that always exists and a 'normal' user can't lstat it?

What is the difference between "...", '...', $'...', and $"..." quotes?

Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?

What to do with threats of blacklisting?

Website seeing my Facebook data?



Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a “socialist”?


Why is communism considered as evil (like fascism and nazism) in the United States?Why does the U.S. left-wing party hate being called “socialist”, but in France the left-wing party proudly calls itself “the Socialist Party”?What would Bernie Sanders look like in other political systems?Why do people in the United States seem so averse to a Public Health system?Do the Democratic/Republican parties have any control over their membership and primary votersIs Bernie Sanders allowed to finance a trip to Vatican from campaign funds?Bernie Sanders says his campaign has made the political establishment nervousWhat's the explanation behind Obama's joke about Bernie Sanders?Bernie Sanders and the Political RevolutionWhat would Bernie Sanders look like in other political systems?Why is Bernie Sanders associated with pudding?Why did the DNC try to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the Democratic Nomination?Is the GUE-NGL unwilling to advise against Brexit? If so, why?













81















As a German I really don't get calling Bernie Sanders a socialist. In every country in Europe he would be a social democrat at best, but somehow in the USA he's a "socialist" and "communist" you should be afraid of.



Examples of the media referring to Sanders as a socialist: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5










share|improve this question









New contributor




SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 28





    It might be helpful not to force edit an American perspective ("democratic socialism" = "socialism") into OP's question, when the OP is asking from a German point of view, especially when OP makes a distinction between "social democrat" and "'socialist' and 'communist'."

    – BurnsBA
    Feb 22 at 19:02






  • 8





    Perhaps you could explain, for the benefit of Americans and other non-Europeans, exactly how a social democrat differs from a socialist? When I do a search, the first thing that pops up is the dictionary definition: "a supporter or advocate of a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means". So it would seem that social democrats are simply a subset of socialists, no?

    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 13





    @jamesqf Wikipedia definition: "Social democracy [..] supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist economy." Early social democrats tried to achieve socialism by working within the system, but they eventually abandoned the goal and accepted market economy.

    – Jouni Sirén
    2 days ago






  • 5





    @Jouni Sirén: Yes, so that makes social democrats a variety of socialist, no? I don't, incidentally, see why a market economy is incompatibe with socialism: it's simply a more efficient method of arranging an economy than Communist-style central planning.

    – jamesqf
    yesterday






  • 9





    @jamesqf In the European usage, socialism is defined by the intent to replace market economy with socialist economy. If someone accepts private ownership of the means of production, they are not socialist in this sense.

    – Jouni Sirén
    yesterday
















81















As a German I really don't get calling Bernie Sanders a socialist. In every country in Europe he would be a social democrat at best, but somehow in the USA he's a "socialist" and "communist" you should be afraid of.



Examples of the media referring to Sanders as a socialist: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5










share|improve this question









New contributor




SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 28





    It might be helpful not to force edit an American perspective ("democratic socialism" = "socialism") into OP's question, when the OP is asking from a German point of view, especially when OP makes a distinction between "social democrat" and "'socialist' and 'communist'."

    – BurnsBA
    Feb 22 at 19:02






  • 8





    Perhaps you could explain, for the benefit of Americans and other non-Europeans, exactly how a social democrat differs from a socialist? When I do a search, the first thing that pops up is the dictionary definition: "a supporter or advocate of a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means". So it would seem that social democrats are simply a subset of socialists, no?

    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 13





    @jamesqf Wikipedia definition: "Social democracy [..] supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist economy." Early social democrats tried to achieve socialism by working within the system, but they eventually abandoned the goal and accepted market economy.

    – Jouni Sirén
    2 days ago






  • 5





    @Jouni Sirén: Yes, so that makes social democrats a variety of socialist, no? I don't, incidentally, see why a market economy is incompatibe with socialism: it's simply a more efficient method of arranging an economy than Communist-style central planning.

    – jamesqf
    yesterday






  • 9





    @jamesqf In the European usage, socialism is defined by the intent to replace market economy with socialist economy. If someone accepts private ownership of the means of production, they are not socialist in this sense.

    – Jouni Sirén
    yesterday














81












81








81


9






As a German I really don't get calling Bernie Sanders a socialist. In every country in Europe he would be a social democrat at best, but somehow in the USA he's a "socialist" and "communist" you should be afraid of.



Examples of the media referring to Sanders as a socialist: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5










share|improve this question









New contributor




SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












As a German I really don't get calling Bernie Sanders a socialist. In every country in Europe he would be a social democrat at best, but somehow in the USA he's a "socialist" and "communist" you should be afraid of.



Examples of the media referring to Sanders as a socialist: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5







united-states socialism bernie-sanders






share|improve this question









New contributor




SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Community

1




1






New contributor




SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Feb 22 at 10:17









SethFrkinRollinsSethFrkinRollins

412123




412123




New contributor




SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SethFrkinRollins is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 28





    It might be helpful not to force edit an American perspective ("democratic socialism" = "socialism") into OP's question, when the OP is asking from a German point of view, especially when OP makes a distinction between "social democrat" and "'socialist' and 'communist'."

    – BurnsBA
    Feb 22 at 19:02






  • 8





    Perhaps you could explain, for the benefit of Americans and other non-Europeans, exactly how a social democrat differs from a socialist? When I do a search, the first thing that pops up is the dictionary definition: "a supporter or advocate of a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means". So it would seem that social democrats are simply a subset of socialists, no?

    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 13





    @jamesqf Wikipedia definition: "Social democracy [..] supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist economy." Early social democrats tried to achieve socialism by working within the system, but they eventually abandoned the goal and accepted market economy.

    – Jouni Sirén
    2 days ago






  • 5





    @Jouni Sirén: Yes, so that makes social democrats a variety of socialist, no? I don't, incidentally, see why a market economy is incompatibe with socialism: it's simply a more efficient method of arranging an economy than Communist-style central planning.

    – jamesqf
    yesterday






  • 9





    @jamesqf In the European usage, socialism is defined by the intent to replace market economy with socialist economy. If someone accepts private ownership of the means of production, they are not socialist in this sense.

    – Jouni Sirén
    yesterday














  • 28





    It might be helpful not to force edit an American perspective ("democratic socialism" = "socialism") into OP's question, when the OP is asking from a German point of view, especially when OP makes a distinction between "social democrat" and "'socialist' and 'communist'."

    – BurnsBA
    Feb 22 at 19:02






  • 8





    Perhaps you could explain, for the benefit of Americans and other non-Europeans, exactly how a social democrat differs from a socialist? When I do a search, the first thing that pops up is the dictionary definition: "a supporter or advocate of a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means". So it would seem that social democrats are simply a subset of socialists, no?

    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 13





    @jamesqf Wikipedia definition: "Social democracy [..] supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist economy." Early social democrats tried to achieve socialism by working within the system, but they eventually abandoned the goal and accepted market economy.

    – Jouni Sirén
    2 days ago






  • 5





    @Jouni Sirén: Yes, so that makes social democrats a variety of socialist, no? I don't, incidentally, see why a market economy is incompatibe with socialism: it's simply a more efficient method of arranging an economy than Communist-style central planning.

    – jamesqf
    yesterday






  • 9





    @jamesqf In the European usage, socialism is defined by the intent to replace market economy with socialist economy. If someone accepts private ownership of the means of production, they are not socialist in this sense.

    – Jouni Sirén
    yesterday








28




28





It might be helpful not to force edit an American perspective ("democratic socialism" = "socialism") into OP's question, when the OP is asking from a German point of view, especially when OP makes a distinction between "social democrat" and "'socialist' and 'communist'."

– BurnsBA
Feb 22 at 19:02





It might be helpful not to force edit an American perspective ("democratic socialism" = "socialism") into OP's question, when the OP is asking from a German point of view, especially when OP makes a distinction between "social democrat" and "'socialist' and 'communist'."

– BurnsBA
Feb 22 at 19:02




8




8





Perhaps you could explain, for the benefit of Americans and other non-Europeans, exactly how a social democrat differs from a socialist? When I do a search, the first thing that pops up is the dictionary definition: "a supporter or advocate of a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means". So it would seem that social democrats are simply a subset of socialists, no?

– jamesqf
2 days ago





Perhaps you could explain, for the benefit of Americans and other non-Europeans, exactly how a social democrat differs from a socialist? When I do a search, the first thing that pops up is the dictionary definition: "a supporter or advocate of a socialist system of government achieved by democratic means". So it would seem that social democrats are simply a subset of socialists, no?

– jamesqf
2 days ago




13




13





@jamesqf Wikipedia definition: "Social democracy [..] supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist economy." Early social democrats tried to achieve socialism by working within the system, but they eventually abandoned the goal and accepted market economy.

– Jouni Sirén
2 days ago





@jamesqf Wikipedia definition: "Social democracy [..] supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and a capitalist economy." Early social democrats tried to achieve socialism by working within the system, but they eventually abandoned the goal and accepted market economy.

– Jouni Sirén
2 days ago




5




5





@Jouni Sirén: Yes, so that makes social democrats a variety of socialist, no? I don't, incidentally, see why a market economy is incompatibe with socialism: it's simply a more efficient method of arranging an economy than Communist-style central planning.

– jamesqf
yesterday





@Jouni Sirén: Yes, so that makes social democrats a variety of socialist, no? I don't, incidentally, see why a market economy is incompatibe with socialism: it's simply a more efficient method of arranging an economy than Communist-style central planning.

– jamesqf
yesterday




9




9





@jamesqf In the European usage, socialism is defined by the intent to replace market economy with socialist economy. If someone accepts private ownership of the means of production, they are not socialist in this sense.

– Jouni Sirén
yesterday





@jamesqf In the European usage, socialism is defined by the intent to replace market economy with socialist economy. If someone accepts private ownership of the means of production, they are not socialist in this sense.

– Jouni Sirén
yesterday










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















84














Basically Bernie Sanders used the wrong term and it stuck. For some unfathomable reason, he refers to himself as a socialist while espousing policies that are clearly social Democrat in line with most European states. He has done himself no favors. If he had said social democrat, he wouldn't have received as much McCarthy-ist style attacks. He is definitely espousing a European style model rather than a Venezuelan style model. Because of his mistake, the term's meaning has changed, and now others like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are calling themselves socialists too even though they're not.
The DSA themselves also describe themselves in terms that sound a lot more like social democracy than democratic socialism.



Bernie's key policy positions are all Medicare For All, lowering prescription drug prices, a jobs program to shift America's energy production rapidly towards green energy, and tuition free public colleges. I could source this, but he says it in literally every speech or interview he's ever done, so that would be a bit redundant!



Bernie Sanders gave a great interview in 2006 with Democracy Now where he explained his version of socialism. You can compare that with the DSA position linked above.






share|improve this answer





















  • 8





    Did Saunders first use the term before any opponents called hm that? Sources for either would help.

    – Mark
    Feb 22 at 15:59






  • 39





    I think calling his use strictly wrong is overstating the matter. Here's wikipedia's (supported by sources) definition of socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole" [emphasis mine]. Expanded banking, environmental, & healthcare regulation, increased government spending and welfare, these are all things that could be construed to be at least partially "socialism" under this definition.

    – mbrig
    Feb 22 at 17:01






  • 7





    @mbrig The current Wikipedia article does not have that definition, and I can't find it in the recent revision history either.

    – Jouni Sirén
    Feb 23 at 1:54






  • 13





    Also note that many socialist or communist nations, even tyrannical authoritarian ones, have always slapped "Democratic", "Republic", or "People" in their name (e.g. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (North Korea), "People's Republic of China", "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)"). To many right-wing Americans, "democratic socialism" just means "socialism with an extra dash of deception by pretending to be democratic". The general rightwing feeling being, "if you have to convince me you're democratic by adding it into your name, you probably aren't."

    – Jamin Grey
    Feb 23 at 3:05








  • 7





    @JouniSirén ah my bad, that's the definition google is popping up in its little info box, which they usually crib from wikipedia, but in this case, seems to be some kind of dictionary they aren't linking. My apologies

    – mbrig
    2 days ago



















49















Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




I think getting a quick history lesson to get some context might help explain how "socialist" is used in US media.



First, I want to highlight the long history of anti-(anti-capitalism); second, show how anything anti-capitalism is generally conflated; and third, how this is the case in the present day.





Discussing communism might seem like a detour, but bear with me for a moment. I'll start with The (first) Red Scare (1917-1920):




Political scientist, and former member of the Communist Party Murray B. Levin wrote that the Red Scare was "a nationwide anti-radical hysteria provoked by a mounting fear and anxiety that a Bolshevik revolution in America was imminent—a revolution that would change Church, home, marriage, civility, and the American way of Life".




Around the time of the second world war McCarthyism (~ second red scare) took hold:




During the McCarthy era, hundreds of Americans were accused of being communists or communist sympathizers; they became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private industry panels, committees and agencies.




You might notice that the above two quotes only reference communism. I'll discuss this a bit more below, but I want to continue the walk through history with a quote from wiki page on the history of socialism in the United States:




COINTELPRO [(1956–1971)] was a series of covert and at times illegal[189] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveying, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations[190] FBI records show that 85% of COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed "subversive",[191] including communist and socialist organizations; ...




The point is, there's a long history in the US of government responses to anti-capitalist movements, as these are generally not viewed favorably. There's a lot more that could be said (labor movements; class; race & racism; gender, to name a few related issues), but that's a rough overview.





The second point I wanted to address was the conflation of anti-capitalist terms. I pointed out that two of the quotes only mentioned communism, but actually all of the above wiki pages can be found on the history of socialism in the US wiki page. I wanted to bring this up to point out that the government response conflates anti-capitalist movements. The same wiki page notes that




The widespread use of the word "socialism" as a political epithet against the Obama government by its opponents caused National Director Frank Llewellyn to declare that "over the past 12 months, the Democratic Socialists of America has received more media attention than it has over the past 12 years"




Even though the Obama administration and most leftists agreed that his administration was not socialist. The source for this claim is a Chicago Tribune article, which goes on to say:




To most, socialist policies are synonymous with any expansion in government spending (although many capitalist nations funnel more of their gross domestic product through the public sector than the U.S. does). source




Here's a foxnews article which defines socialism as communism, (though I think the author was trying to distinguish the two):




There was a time in American politics when the term "socialism" conjured up images of the Cold War, the U.S.S.R, Joseph Stalin and Karl Marx, nuclear threats, government domination of private industry and gulags. For most Americans who came of age during the height of the Cold War, who remember being taught to hide under their desks at school, socialism – like communism – has long been a dirty word. source




In summary, in the United States, pro-capitalism is the majority view (to varying degrees; this means different things to different people). That is, people endorsing communism, socialism, and democratic socialism are a small minority (i.e., as a ruling system of government). The distinction between communism, socialism, and democratic socialism is generally lost on anyone outside specific academic groups, and lost on the general a-politic public. It is only when you venture in to certain leftist groups that the distinction between these groups is recognized. (And maybe certain non-leftist groups too. The point is, a small minority.)





Third, to go back to the original question:




Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




You're right that Sanders is not a socialist. But he's aware of the US sentiment of the term, as I outlined above. For example, an article on a Sanders speech :




Throughout the decades, he [Sanders] argued, "socialist" has been a term conservatives deployed when Democrats do something popular:




Almost everything [Roosevelt] proposed was called "socialist." I thought I would mention that just in passing. Social Security, which transformed life for the elderly in this country, was defined by his opponents as "socialist." The concept of the "minimum wage"—that workers had to be paid at least a certain amount of money for their labor—was seen as a radical intrusion into the marketplace and was described as "socialist."





He has embraced this view of himself as someone that supports progressive social policies. Though he does tend to describe himself as "social democratic" when discussing the topic, and seems to be aware of the different in terms:




Sanders: Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, often criticizes President Obama, incorrectly, for trying to push "European-style socialism," and McConnell says the American people don’t want it. First of all, of course, Obama is not trying to push European-style socialism. Second of all, I happen to believe that, if the American people understood the significant accomplishments that have taken place under social-democratic governments, democratic-socialist governments, labor governments throughout Europe, they would be shocked to know about those accomplishments. One of the goals of this campaign is to advance that understanding… source






In summary, Sanders is called "socialist" because the US media in general describes policies that provide some kind of assistance (for example, food aid or health care) as socialist. This is just the current nature of the discussion at the national level. This is a rather US centric (i.e., isolated) understanding of the term "socialist" which is more properly understood in countries to the left of the United States.



Sanders doesn't seem to object to the term if it is applied to him, but when discussing his views will refer to himself as "democratic socialist" instead of "socialist." And just as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is not democratic, neither is "democratic socialist" the same thing as "socialist." But as detailed above, this distinction is rarely made clear in US media.






share|improve this answer





















  • 15





    I downvoted for the simple reason that this is a needlessly longwinded answer that fails to point out Bernie Sanders is called a socialist because he calls himself a socialist. The fact that he isn't a socialist according to several previously well understood definitions doesn't negate the fact that this term is used to describe himself because he uses it.

    – Joe
    Feb 22 at 16:45






  • 14





    @Joe, I think you are confusing 1) when he doesn't make a pedantic argument against the "socialist" label and 2) how he describes himself as "democrat socialist". For example, Sanders saying (1) "The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist" and (2) "what democratic socialism means to me" both in this MSNBC article. I tried to make this point in my answer, but perhaps you have a suggestion for how I can clarify. msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism

    – BurnsBA
    Feb 22 at 17:03






  • 13





    @Joe, that's beyond pedantic, and demonstrably false. If you call yourself an anti-capitalist, it doesn't mean folk should conflate you as a capitalist because anti-capitalist has "capitalist" in the name. As an American, it really bums me out that we're generally so ignorant of semantics and actual meanings in things. Bernie could call himself anything and the right would decry him as a socialist due to his platform. And no, I'm not a leftist. I'm simply an American dude who's tired of ignorant rhetoric in my country's politics.

    – Jesse Williams
    Feb 22 at 20:08






  • 13





    And the fact that you found this answer too "long winded" is exactly WHY it's so tiresome talking to most other Americans about politics. Nobody wants foundational information, just an echo chamber that tells them they are right all the time.

    – Jesse Williams
    Feb 22 at 20:09






  • 6





    @Joe isn't fox mainstream then?

    – Mark
    2 days ago



















31














It seems likely that people call him a socialist because he's self-identified as one on multiple occasions.



Sander Socialist



and




When he first won election to the House in 1990, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced his political identity. "I am a socialist and everyone knows that," Sanders said, responding to an ad that tried to link him to the regime of Fidel Castro.



Washington Post: Bernie Sanders is an avowed socialist. 52 percent of Democrats are OK with that.




etc.






share|improve this answer
























  • That's a relevant answer, but even Sanders doesn't mean what Europeans mean when they say 'socialist'. His platform is social democratic by European standards. The word 'socialist' is simply a 'false friend'.

    – henning
    14 hours ago








  • 3





    @henning - If you go around calling yourself a socialist, people will call you one.

    – Valorum
    13 hours ago











  • I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying this word means something else in Europe than in the US, hence OP's confusion. When Americans say they drive a truck, they don't necessarily mean a 7 t vehicle with twin tires.

    – henning
    10 hours ago





















15














Folks who support the view that Sanders is actually socialist frequently point to this quote from him way back in 1987:




Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production, it
means decentralization, it means involving people in their work.
Rather than having bosses and workers it means having democratic
control over the factories and shops to as great a degree as you can.




Sanders continues to demonstrate admiration for Eugene V. Debs, the most prominent Socialist candidate in the history of the United States.



But yes, if we focus on his major policy proposals and imagine Sanders in a multiparty parliamentary democracy, the label "Social Democrat" would be a better fit.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    Interesting quote, but do folks actually frequently refer to his 1987 quote?

    – gerrit
    yesterday











  • @gerrit I noticed this quote all over non-public Facebook comments the day he announced. If I search "Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production" on google I find 167 hits, and on the top page at least, they all are about Bernie Sanders.

    – Brian Z
    20 hours ago






  • 3





    I would consider 167 Google hits to be really a rather small number.

    – gerrit
    18 hours ago











  • If he said that, he's grossly wrong: democracy doesn't mean that in any dictionary. Perhaps the quotation is wrong, and that could explain its low hit number: in some circles, socialism may mean this. But what he's really describing is Anarcho-syndicalism.

    – Zeus
    5 hours ago





















11














I think there's an important distinction to be made in the examples you noted.



The left-of-center news outlets actually make an effort to call him by his chosen name of "Democratic Socialist."





  • The Hill (left-center)


  • The Nation (left)


It's the right-wing sources that conflate the terminology.





  • Daily Mail (right, questionable source)


  • Newsmax (right)


  • Fox News (right)


(Of course, by European standard, all of these sources would probably be considered a little more to the right than the US ranks them.)



The right-wing likes to use the word socialism as a pejorative, capitalizing on how little Americans know about socialism in the non-pejorative sense, and how much disinformation and conflations has been made about it in the past. If you live in the US, go ahead, try asking random people you know what socialism is. You'll probably get some really funny answers, like "Putin is a socialist" as I do when the topic comes up.






share|improve this answer































    7














    The meaning of the word socialist changes by country and by era. Social democratic is especially crucial in Germany because of the national-socialist phenomenon. The word is a popular ideal which was abused by despots and which lost favor after the 80's, mostly for it's use by despots, it's vagueness and lack of concencus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_communist_states_and_socialist_states



    Socialism in the 20th century started out as an ideal term for debate of human rights of expression, minimum wage, trade unions, in the 1920s.
    The 1920's ideal is how I was introduced to the concept of socialism in philosophy and history, and same goes for Bernie Sanders too, probably.



    Socialism changes a lot by decade and Bernie probably associates socialism with the ideals of his father's generation from the 30's, rather than the recent historical corruptions of socialism used by Venezuela, Germany, Burma, Romania, Lybia and others.



    Usage frequency of various political terms according to Googgle Ngram Search:



    Ngram chart






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      How precisely is the ngram supporting any of the argument you gave? Not that I assume that it would be wrong; I just feel the diagram is just a show-off that adds no substantial information.

      – antipattern
      2 days ago








    • 3





      I don't understand this answer. Venezuela and Germany?

      – gerrit
      yesterday













    • It shows the meaning of the word socialist! the political philosophical word of the 1920's and 30's was very prevalent around in 1938 as it was corrupted by the NAZIs, and then it peaked in the middle of the cold war, so it demonstrates why a german would see him as a "social democrat at best". Venezuela and Germany have both had repressive socialist autocracies relatively recently, as has Cuba, Russia, China, and many others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

      – com.prehensible
      20 hours ago





















    4














    During the time he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, Bernie Sanders referred to himself as a socialist, and was referred to that way in the press. (source: Wikipedia). In his youth, he had been a member of the Young Socialists of America. To my knowledge, that group was socialist, not social democrat, or democratic socialist.



    His political thinking may have evolved over the decades, or he may have found a new way to package the same ideas. However, it remains true that the label socialist is one that he took on himself and not one that was pinned on him by detractors.



    When he describes his overall vision today, he often cites the model of Nordic Socialism as the kind of society he is aiming for. However, it's important to realize that the Scandinavian countries are not socialist, and their leaderships are quite insistent about this. Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated.



    Tax rates on companies are comparable to similar rates in the USA, considered a capitalist economy. So if that is what he is really aiming for, it would be appropriate to refer to him as something other than a "Democratic Socialist". It's unclear exactly what is meant by Democratic Socialism in any event. It depends on who you ask.






    share|improve this answer
























    • "Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated." That statement is why many Americans laugh when Europeans claim they aren't socialist. Just because the government "lets" people own companies, the government is still essentially dictating how the companies operate through the heavy regulation. There's not a lot of difference between that and the government outright controlling the companies. It's like a parent who "gives" their teenage child a car but reserves the right to take the car away from them at any time. IOW, the child doesn't really own the car.

      – Dunk
      10 hours ago





















    1














    American political taxonomy is a bit different from that of other countries, so it should come as no surprise that you're puzzled.



    The primary axis for American political discussion is the degree of power wielded by the central (Federal) government. The (rather ill-defined) central position is shared by Democrats and Republicans, and advancing to the Left the major divisions are: Liberal/Democrat (the two are often interchangeable), Socialist, and Communist. While Europeans have a larger, more nuanced, list of variations, the US 2-party system has pretty well subsumed all of the European distinctions into Liberal/Democrat or Socialist. Within the US, socialism is generally seen as a system which gives enormous power to the central government without the totalitarian flavor of Communism. Consequently, for Bernie to identify himself as socialist simply means that he has advocated a greater role for the Federal government than is currently accepted by the Democratic party. Within the usual usage of the terms, he could have chosen either ultra-liberal or socialist. He picked socialist. Bernie made his political debut as mayor of Burlington, Vt in 1981, and it was at that time that he described himself as socialist, and the term was picked up by the newspapers. Given that these were the Reagan years, this did help to give him a well-defined political identity. To the amazement and relief of the city, he was apparently a good mayor, and did not let ideology get in the way of running the city. The relief was not shared by the Republican and Democratic leaders in Burlington, who were unable to get him out until he chose to run for the House of Representatives.



    At about the same time, the US (including Vermont) went through a condominium conversion boom/bust cycle, and the rise of awareness of genital Herpes. This gave rise to the Burlington political joke:




    Q - Which one of the following items does not belong on this list?



    A) Gonorrhea B) Bernie Sanders C) Herpes D) A condo in St. Albans



    A - Gonorrhea. You can get rid of Gonorrhea.







    share|improve this answer

































      -4














      The definition of socialism is




      Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.




      Bernie Sanders wants free healthcare and free college, which means it is run by the government. When the government is providing the services of health and education, that is socialism. In the above definition, I assume goods also means "goods and services".






      share|improve this answer



















      • 22





        Public goods can be provisioned without the government owning the means of production. "Free college" and "free healthcare" proposals typically consist of the government paying for things on behalf of the consumer, not the federal government owning every college and hospital in America.

        – Joe
        Feb 22 at 18:31








      • 13





        I didn't know that most industrialized countries (which provide some form of free healthcare and free education) are socialist countries. Please call Theresa May and tell her that she leads a socialist government. :-)

        – Martin Schröder
        Feb 22 at 19:52








      • 17





        Why is free college socialism and free K-12 school not? Hmm....

        – Geobits
        Feb 22 at 21:12






      • 4





        In the US (or everywhere?) most of the "means of producing" military safety are owned by the government

        – Hagen von Eitzen
        Feb 22 at 21:44






      • 13





        This answer is fallacious. Jazz is defined as music characterized by polyphony, syncopation, and improvization. Beethoven's music contains these elements, therefore Beethoven is a jazz composer. Silly.

        – barbecue
        Feb 22 at 23:50










      protected by Philipp Feb 22 at 18:26



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes








      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      84














      Basically Bernie Sanders used the wrong term and it stuck. For some unfathomable reason, he refers to himself as a socialist while espousing policies that are clearly social Democrat in line with most European states. He has done himself no favors. If he had said social democrat, he wouldn't have received as much McCarthy-ist style attacks. He is definitely espousing a European style model rather than a Venezuelan style model. Because of his mistake, the term's meaning has changed, and now others like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are calling themselves socialists too even though they're not.
      The DSA themselves also describe themselves in terms that sound a lot more like social democracy than democratic socialism.



      Bernie's key policy positions are all Medicare For All, lowering prescription drug prices, a jobs program to shift America's energy production rapidly towards green energy, and tuition free public colleges. I could source this, but he says it in literally every speech or interview he's ever done, so that would be a bit redundant!



      Bernie Sanders gave a great interview in 2006 with Democracy Now where he explained his version of socialism. You can compare that with the DSA position linked above.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        Did Saunders first use the term before any opponents called hm that? Sources for either would help.

        – Mark
        Feb 22 at 15:59






      • 39





        I think calling his use strictly wrong is overstating the matter. Here's wikipedia's (supported by sources) definition of socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole" [emphasis mine]. Expanded banking, environmental, & healthcare regulation, increased government spending and welfare, these are all things that could be construed to be at least partially "socialism" under this definition.

        – mbrig
        Feb 22 at 17:01






      • 7





        @mbrig The current Wikipedia article does not have that definition, and I can't find it in the recent revision history either.

        – Jouni Sirén
        Feb 23 at 1:54






      • 13





        Also note that many socialist or communist nations, even tyrannical authoritarian ones, have always slapped "Democratic", "Republic", or "People" in their name (e.g. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (North Korea), "People's Republic of China", "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)"). To many right-wing Americans, "democratic socialism" just means "socialism with an extra dash of deception by pretending to be democratic". The general rightwing feeling being, "if you have to convince me you're democratic by adding it into your name, you probably aren't."

        – Jamin Grey
        Feb 23 at 3:05








      • 7





        @JouniSirén ah my bad, that's the definition google is popping up in its little info box, which they usually crib from wikipedia, but in this case, seems to be some kind of dictionary they aren't linking. My apologies

        – mbrig
        2 days ago
















      84














      Basically Bernie Sanders used the wrong term and it stuck. For some unfathomable reason, he refers to himself as a socialist while espousing policies that are clearly social Democrat in line with most European states. He has done himself no favors. If he had said social democrat, he wouldn't have received as much McCarthy-ist style attacks. He is definitely espousing a European style model rather than a Venezuelan style model. Because of his mistake, the term's meaning has changed, and now others like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are calling themselves socialists too even though they're not.
      The DSA themselves also describe themselves in terms that sound a lot more like social democracy than democratic socialism.



      Bernie's key policy positions are all Medicare For All, lowering prescription drug prices, a jobs program to shift America's energy production rapidly towards green energy, and tuition free public colleges. I could source this, but he says it in literally every speech or interview he's ever done, so that would be a bit redundant!



      Bernie Sanders gave a great interview in 2006 with Democracy Now where he explained his version of socialism. You can compare that with the DSA position linked above.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        Did Saunders first use the term before any opponents called hm that? Sources for either would help.

        – Mark
        Feb 22 at 15:59






      • 39





        I think calling his use strictly wrong is overstating the matter. Here's wikipedia's (supported by sources) definition of socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole" [emphasis mine]. Expanded banking, environmental, & healthcare regulation, increased government spending and welfare, these are all things that could be construed to be at least partially "socialism" under this definition.

        – mbrig
        Feb 22 at 17:01






      • 7





        @mbrig The current Wikipedia article does not have that definition, and I can't find it in the recent revision history either.

        – Jouni Sirén
        Feb 23 at 1:54






      • 13





        Also note that many socialist or communist nations, even tyrannical authoritarian ones, have always slapped "Democratic", "Republic", or "People" in their name (e.g. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (North Korea), "People's Republic of China", "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)"). To many right-wing Americans, "democratic socialism" just means "socialism with an extra dash of deception by pretending to be democratic". The general rightwing feeling being, "if you have to convince me you're democratic by adding it into your name, you probably aren't."

        – Jamin Grey
        Feb 23 at 3:05








      • 7





        @JouniSirén ah my bad, that's the definition google is popping up in its little info box, which they usually crib from wikipedia, but in this case, seems to be some kind of dictionary they aren't linking. My apologies

        – mbrig
        2 days ago














      84












      84








      84







      Basically Bernie Sanders used the wrong term and it stuck. For some unfathomable reason, he refers to himself as a socialist while espousing policies that are clearly social Democrat in line with most European states. He has done himself no favors. If he had said social democrat, he wouldn't have received as much McCarthy-ist style attacks. He is definitely espousing a European style model rather than a Venezuelan style model. Because of his mistake, the term's meaning has changed, and now others like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are calling themselves socialists too even though they're not.
      The DSA themselves also describe themselves in terms that sound a lot more like social democracy than democratic socialism.



      Bernie's key policy positions are all Medicare For All, lowering prescription drug prices, a jobs program to shift America's energy production rapidly towards green energy, and tuition free public colleges. I could source this, but he says it in literally every speech or interview he's ever done, so that would be a bit redundant!



      Bernie Sanders gave a great interview in 2006 with Democracy Now where he explained his version of socialism. You can compare that with the DSA position linked above.






      share|improve this answer















      Basically Bernie Sanders used the wrong term and it stuck. For some unfathomable reason, he refers to himself as a socialist while espousing policies that are clearly social Democrat in line with most European states. He has done himself no favors. If he had said social democrat, he wouldn't have received as much McCarthy-ist style attacks. He is definitely espousing a European style model rather than a Venezuelan style model. Because of his mistake, the term's meaning has changed, and now others like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are calling themselves socialists too even though they're not.
      The DSA themselves also describe themselves in terms that sound a lot more like social democracy than democratic socialism.



      Bernie's key policy positions are all Medicare For All, lowering prescription drug prices, a jobs program to shift America's energy production rapidly towards green energy, and tuition free public colleges. I could source this, but he says it in literally every speech or interview he's ever done, so that would be a bit redundant!



      Bernie Sanders gave a great interview in 2006 with Democracy Now where he explained his version of socialism. You can compare that with the DSA position linked above.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Feb 22 at 18:19









      Carson

      942621




      942621










      answered Feb 22 at 10:43









      IcarianIcarian

      2,5802619




      2,5802619








      • 8





        Did Saunders first use the term before any opponents called hm that? Sources for either would help.

        – Mark
        Feb 22 at 15:59






      • 39





        I think calling his use strictly wrong is overstating the matter. Here's wikipedia's (supported by sources) definition of socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole" [emphasis mine]. Expanded banking, environmental, & healthcare regulation, increased government spending and welfare, these are all things that could be construed to be at least partially "socialism" under this definition.

        – mbrig
        Feb 22 at 17:01






      • 7





        @mbrig The current Wikipedia article does not have that definition, and I can't find it in the recent revision history either.

        – Jouni Sirén
        Feb 23 at 1:54






      • 13





        Also note that many socialist or communist nations, even tyrannical authoritarian ones, have always slapped "Democratic", "Republic", or "People" in their name (e.g. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (North Korea), "People's Republic of China", "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)"). To many right-wing Americans, "democratic socialism" just means "socialism with an extra dash of deception by pretending to be democratic". The general rightwing feeling being, "if you have to convince me you're democratic by adding it into your name, you probably aren't."

        – Jamin Grey
        Feb 23 at 3:05








      • 7





        @JouniSirén ah my bad, that's the definition google is popping up in its little info box, which they usually crib from wikipedia, but in this case, seems to be some kind of dictionary they aren't linking. My apologies

        – mbrig
        2 days ago














      • 8





        Did Saunders first use the term before any opponents called hm that? Sources for either would help.

        – Mark
        Feb 22 at 15:59






      • 39





        I think calling his use strictly wrong is overstating the matter. Here's wikipedia's (supported by sources) definition of socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole" [emphasis mine]. Expanded banking, environmental, & healthcare regulation, increased government spending and welfare, these are all things that could be construed to be at least partially "socialism" under this definition.

        – mbrig
        Feb 22 at 17:01






      • 7





        @mbrig The current Wikipedia article does not have that definition, and I can't find it in the recent revision history either.

        – Jouni Sirén
        Feb 23 at 1:54






      • 13





        Also note that many socialist or communist nations, even tyrannical authoritarian ones, have always slapped "Democratic", "Republic", or "People" in their name (e.g. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (North Korea), "People's Republic of China", "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)"). To many right-wing Americans, "democratic socialism" just means "socialism with an extra dash of deception by pretending to be democratic". The general rightwing feeling being, "if you have to convince me you're democratic by adding it into your name, you probably aren't."

        – Jamin Grey
        Feb 23 at 3:05








      • 7





        @JouniSirén ah my bad, that's the definition google is popping up in its little info box, which they usually crib from wikipedia, but in this case, seems to be some kind of dictionary they aren't linking. My apologies

        – mbrig
        2 days ago








      8




      8





      Did Saunders first use the term before any opponents called hm that? Sources for either would help.

      – Mark
      Feb 22 at 15:59





      Did Saunders first use the term before any opponents called hm that? Sources for either would help.

      – Mark
      Feb 22 at 15:59




      39




      39





      I think calling his use strictly wrong is overstating the matter. Here's wikipedia's (supported by sources) definition of socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole" [emphasis mine]. Expanded banking, environmental, & healthcare regulation, increased government spending and welfare, these are all things that could be construed to be at least partially "socialism" under this definition.

      – mbrig
      Feb 22 at 17:01





      I think calling his use strictly wrong is overstating the matter. Here's wikipedia's (supported by sources) definition of socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole" [emphasis mine]. Expanded banking, environmental, & healthcare regulation, increased government spending and welfare, these are all things that could be construed to be at least partially "socialism" under this definition.

      – mbrig
      Feb 22 at 17:01




      7




      7





      @mbrig The current Wikipedia article does not have that definition, and I can't find it in the recent revision history either.

      – Jouni Sirén
      Feb 23 at 1:54





      @mbrig The current Wikipedia article does not have that definition, and I can't find it in the recent revision history either.

      – Jouni Sirén
      Feb 23 at 1:54




      13




      13





      Also note that many socialist or communist nations, even tyrannical authoritarian ones, have always slapped "Democratic", "Republic", or "People" in their name (e.g. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (North Korea), "People's Republic of China", "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)"). To many right-wing Americans, "democratic socialism" just means "socialism with an extra dash of deception by pretending to be democratic". The general rightwing feeling being, "if you have to convince me you're democratic by adding it into your name, you probably aren't."

      – Jamin Grey
      Feb 23 at 3:05







      Also note that many socialist or communist nations, even tyrannical authoritarian ones, have always slapped "Democratic", "Republic", or "People" in their name (e.g. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (North Korea), "People's Republic of China", "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)"). To many right-wing Americans, "democratic socialism" just means "socialism with an extra dash of deception by pretending to be democratic". The general rightwing feeling being, "if you have to convince me you're democratic by adding it into your name, you probably aren't."

      – Jamin Grey
      Feb 23 at 3:05






      7




      7





      @JouniSirén ah my bad, that's the definition google is popping up in its little info box, which they usually crib from wikipedia, but in this case, seems to be some kind of dictionary they aren't linking. My apologies

      – mbrig
      2 days ago





      @JouniSirén ah my bad, that's the definition google is popping up in its little info box, which they usually crib from wikipedia, but in this case, seems to be some kind of dictionary they aren't linking. My apologies

      – mbrig
      2 days ago











      49















      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      I think getting a quick history lesson to get some context might help explain how "socialist" is used in US media.



      First, I want to highlight the long history of anti-(anti-capitalism); second, show how anything anti-capitalism is generally conflated; and third, how this is the case in the present day.





      Discussing communism might seem like a detour, but bear with me for a moment. I'll start with The (first) Red Scare (1917-1920):




      Political scientist, and former member of the Communist Party Murray B. Levin wrote that the Red Scare was "a nationwide anti-radical hysteria provoked by a mounting fear and anxiety that a Bolshevik revolution in America was imminent—a revolution that would change Church, home, marriage, civility, and the American way of Life".




      Around the time of the second world war McCarthyism (~ second red scare) took hold:




      During the McCarthy era, hundreds of Americans were accused of being communists or communist sympathizers; they became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private industry panels, committees and agencies.




      You might notice that the above two quotes only reference communism. I'll discuss this a bit more below, but I want to continue the walk through history with a quote from wiki page on the history of socialism in the United States:




      COINTELPRO [(1956–1971)] was a series of covert and at times illegal[189] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveying, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations[190] FBI records show that 85% of COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed "subversive",[191] including communist and socialist organizations; ...




      The point is, there's a long history in the US of government responses to anti-capitalist movements, as these are generally not viewed favorably. There's a lot more that could be said (labor movements; class; race & racism; gender, to name a few related issues), but that's a rough overview.





      The second point I wanted to address was the conflation of anti-capitalist terms. I pointed out that two of the quotes only mentioned communism, but actually all of the above wiki pages can be found on the history of socialism in the US wiki page. I wanted to bring this up to point out that the government response conflates anti-capitalist movements. The same wiki page notes that




      The widespread use of the word "socialism" as a political epithet against the Obama government by its opponents caused National Director Frank Llewellyn to declare that "over the past 12 months, the Democratic Socialists of America has received more media attention than it has over the past 12 years"




      Even though the Obama administration and most leftists agreed that his administration was not socialist. The source for this claim is a Chicago Tribune article, which goes on to say:




      To most, socialist policies are synonymous with any expansion in government spending (although many capitalist nations funnel more of their gross domestic product through the public sector than the U.S. does). source




      Here's a foxnews article which defines socialism as communism, (though I think the author was trying to distinguish the two):




      There was a time in American politics when the term "socialism" conjured up images of the Cold War, the U.S.S.R, Joseph Stalin and Karl Marx, nuclear threats, government domination of private industry and gulags. For most Americans who came of age during the height of the Cold War, who remember being taught to hide under their desks at school, socialism – like communism – has long been a dirty word. source




      In summary, in the United States, pro-capitalism is the majority view (to varying degrees; this means different things to different people). That is, people endorsing communism, socialism, and democratic socialism are a small minority (i.e., as a ruling system of government). The distinction between communism, socialism, and democratic socialism is generally lost on anyone outside specific academic groups, and lost on the general a-politic public. It is only when you venture in to certain leftist groups that the distinction between these groups is recognized. (And maybe certain non-leftist groups too. The point is, a small minority.)





      Third, to go back to the original question:




      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      You're right that Sanders is not a socialist. But he's aware of the US sentiment of the term, as I outlined above. For example, an article on a Sanders speech :




      Throughout the decades, he [Sanders] argued, "socialist" has been a term conservatives deployed when Democrats do something popular:




      Almost everything [Roosevelt] proposed was called "socialist." I thought I would mention that just in passing. Social Security, which transformed life for the elderly in this country, was defined by his opponents as "socialist." The concept of the "minimum wage"—that workers had to be paid at least a certain amount of money for their labor—was seen as a radical intrusion into the marketplace and was described as "socialist."





      He has embraced this view of himself as someone that supports progressive social policies. Though he does tend to describe himself as "social democratic" when discussing the topic, and seems to be aware of the different in terms:




      Sanders: Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, often criticizes President Obama, incorrectly, for trying to push "European-style socialism," and McConnell says the American people don’t want it. First of all, of course, Obama is not trying to push European-style socialism. Second of all, I happen to believe that, if the American people understood the significant accomplishments that have taken place under social-democratic governments, democratic-socialist governments, labor governments throughout Europe, they would be shocked to know about those accomplishments. One of the goals of this campaign is to advance that understanding… source






      In summary, Sanders is called "socialist" because the US media in general describes policies that provide some kind of assistance (for example, food aid or health care) as socialist. This is just the current nature of the discussion at the national level. This is a rather US centric (i.e., isolated) understanding of the term "socialist" which is more properly understood in countries to the left of the United States.



      Sanders doesn't seem to object to the term if it is applied to him, but when discussing his views will refer to himself as "democratic socialist" instead of "socialist." And just as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is not democratic, neither is "democratic socialist" the same thing as "socialist." But as detailed above, this distinction is rarely made clear in US media.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 15





        I downvoted for the simple reason that this is a needlessly longwinded answer that fails to point out Bernie Sanders is called a socialist because he calls himself a socialist. The fact that he isn't a socialist according to several previously well understood definitions doesn't negate the fact that this term is used to describe himself because he uses it.

        – Joe
        Feb 22 at 16:45






      • 14





        @Joe, I think you are confusing 1) when he doesn't make a pedantic argument against the "socialist" label and 2) how he describes himself as "democrat socialist". For example, Sanders saying (1) "The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist" and (2) "what democratic socialism means to me" both in this MSNBC article. I tried to make this point in my answer, but perhaps you have a suggestion for how I can clarify. msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism

        – BurnsBA
        Feb 22 at 17:03






      • 13





        @Joe, that's beyond pedantic, and demonstrably false. If you call yourself an anti-capitalist, it doesn't mean folk should conflate you as a capitalist because anti-capitalist has "capitalist" in the name. As an American, it really bums me out that we're generally so ignorant of semantics and actual meanings in things. Bernie could call himself anything and the right would decry him as a socialist due to his platform. And no, I'm not a leftist. I'm simply an American dude who's tired of ignorant rhetoric in my country's politics.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:08






      • 13





        And the fact that you found this answer too "long winded" is exactly WHY it's so tiresome talking to most other Americans about politics. Nobody wants foundational information, just an echo chamber that tells them they are right all the time.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:09






      • 6





        @Joe isn't fox mainstream then?

        – Mark
        2 days ago
















      49















      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      I think getting a quick history lesson to get some context might help explain how "socialist" is used in US media.



      First, I want to highlight the long history of anti-(anti-capitalism); second, show how anything anti-capitalism is generally conflated; and third, how this is the case in the present day.





      Discussing communism might seem like a detour, but bear with me for a moment. I'll start with The (first) Red Scare (1917-1920):




      Political scientist, and former member of the Communist Party Murray B. Levin wrote that the Red Scare was "a nationwide anti-radical hysteria provoked by a mounting fear and anxiety that a Bolshevik revolution in America was imminent—a revolution that would change Church, home, marriage, civility, and the American way of Life".




      Around the time of the second world war McCarthyism (~ second red scare) took hold:




      During the McCarthy era, hundreds of Americans were accused of being communists or communist sympathizers; they became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private industry panels, committees and agencies.




      You might notice that the above two quotes only reference communism. I'll discuss this a bit more below, but I want to continue the walk through history with a quote from wiki page on the history of socialism in the United States:




      COINTELPRO [(1956–1971)] was a series of covert and at times illegal[189] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveying, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations[190] FBI records show that 85% of COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed "subversive",[191] including communist and socialist organizations; ...




      The point is, there's a long history in the US of government responses to anti-capitalist movements, as these are generally not viewed favorably. There's a lot more that could be said (labor movements; class; race & racism; gender, to name a few related issues), but that's a rough overview.





      The second point I wanted to address was the conflation of anti-capitalist terms. I pointed out that two of the quotes only mentioned communism, but actually all of the above wiki pages can be found on the history of socialism in the US wiki page. I wanted to bring this up to point out that the government response conflates anti-capitalist movements. The same wiki page notes that




      The widespread use of the word "socialism" as a political epithet against the Obama government by its opponents caused National Director Frank Llewellyn to declare that "over the past 12 months, the Democratic Socialists of America has received more media attention than it has over the past 12 years"




      Even though the Obama administration and most leftists agreed that his administration was not socialist. The source for this claim is a Chicago Tribune article, which goes on to say:




      To most, socialist policies are synonymous with any expansion in government spending (although many capitalist nations funnel more of their gross domestic product through the public sector than the U.S. does). source




      Here's a foxnews article which defines socialism as communism, (though I think the author was trying to distinguish the two):




      There was a time in American politics when the term "socialism" conjured up images of the Cold War, the U.S.S.R, Joseph Stalin and Karl Marx, nuclear threats, government domination of private industry and gulags. For most Americans who came of age during the height of the Cold War, who remember being taught to hide under their desks at school, socialism – like communism – has long been a dirty word. source




      In summary, in the United States, pro-capitalism is the majority view (to varying degrees; this means different things to different people). That is, people endorsing communism, socialism, and democratic socialism are a small minority (i.e., as a ruling system of government). The distinction between communism, socialism, and democratic socialism is generally lost on anyone outside specific academic groups, and lost on the general a-politic public. It is only when you venture in to certain leftist groups that the distinction between these groups is recognized. (And maybe certain non-leftist groups too. The point is, a small minority.)





      Third, to go back to the original question:




      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      You're right that Sanders is not a socialist. But he's aware of the US sentiment of the term, as I outlined above. For example, an article on a Sanders speech :




      Throughout the decades, he [Sanders] argued, "socialist" has been a term conservatives deployed when Democrats do something popular:




      Almost everything [Roosevelt] proposed was called "socialist." I thought I would mention that just in passing. Social Security, which transformed life for the elderly in this country, was defined by his opponents as "socialist." The concept of the "minimum wage"—that workers had to be paid at least a certain amount of money for their labor—was seen as a radical intrusion into the marketplace and was described as "socialist."





      He has embraced this view of himself as someone that supports progressive social policies. Though he does tend to describe himself as "social democratic" when discussing the topic, and seems to be aware of the different in terms:




      Sanders: Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, often criticizes President Obama, incorrectly, for trying to push "European-style socialism," and McConnell says the American people don’t want it. First of all, of course, Obama is not trying to push European-style socialism. Second of all, I happen to believe that, if the American people understood the significant accomplishments that have taken place under social-democratic governments, democratic-socialist governments, labor governments throughout Europe, they would be shocked to know about those accomplishments. One of the goals of this campaign is to advance that understanding… source






      In summary, Sanders is called "socialist" because the US media in general describes policies that provide some kind of assistance (for example, food aid or health care) as socialist. This is just the current nature of the discussion at the national level. This is a rather US centric (i.e., isolated) understanding of the term "socialist" which is more properly understood in countries to the left of the United States.



      Sanders doesn't seem to object to the term if it is applied to him, but when discussing his views will refer to himself as "democratic socialist" instead of "socialist." And just as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is not democratic, neither is "democratic socialist" the same thing as "socialist." But as detailed above, this distinction is rarely made clear in US media.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 15





        I downvoted for the simple reason that this is a needlessly longwinded answer that fails to point out Bernie Sanders is called a socialist because he calls himself a socialist. The fact that he isn't a socialist according to several previously well understood definitions doesn't negate the fact that this term is used to describe himself because he uses it.

        – Joe
        Feb 22 at 16:45






      • 14





        @Joe, I think you are confusing 1) when he doesn't make a pedantic argument against the "socialist" label and 2) how he describes himself as "democrat socialist". For example, Sanders saying (1) "The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist" and (2) "what democratic socialism means to me" both in this MSNBC article. I tried to make this point in my answer, but perhaps you have a suggestion for how I can clarify. msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism

        – BurnsBA
        Feb 22 at 17:03






      • 13





        @Joe, that's beyond pedantic, and demonstrably false. If you call yourself an anti-capitalist, it doesn't mean folk should conflate you as a capitalist because anti-capitalist has "capitalist" in the name. As an American, it really bums me out that we're generally so ignorant of semantics and actual meanings in things. Bernie could call himself anything and the right would decry him as a socialist due to his platform. And no, I'm not a leftist. I'm simply an American dude who's tired of ignorant rhetoric in my country's politics.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:08






      • 13





        And the fact that you found this answer too "long winded" is exactly WHY it's so tiresome talking to most other Americans about politics. Nobody wants foundational information, just an echo chamber that tells them they are right all the time.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:09






      • 6





        @Joe isn't fox mainstream then?

        – Mark
        2 days ago














      49












      49








      49








      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      I think getting a quick history lesson to get some context might help explain how "socialist" is used in US media.



      First, I want to highlight the long history of anti-(anti-capitalism); second, show how anything anti-capitalism is generally conflated; and third, how this is the case in the present day.





      Discussing communism might seem like a detour, but bear with me for a moment. I'll start with The (first) Red Scare (1917-1920):




      Political scientist, and former member of the Communist Party Murray B. Levin wrote that the Red Scare was "a nationwide anti-radical hysteria provoked by a mounting fear and anxiety that a Bolshevik revolution in America was imminent—a revolution that would change Church, home, marriage, civility, and the American way of Life".




      Around the time of the second world war McCarthyism (~ second red scare) took hold:




      During the McCarthy era, hundreds of Americans were accused of being communists or communist sympathizers; they became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private industry panels, committees and agencies.




      You might notice that the above two quotes only reference communism. I'll discuss this a bit more below, but I want to continue the walk through history with a quote from wiki page on the history of socialism in the United States:




      COINTELPRO [(1956–1971)] was a series of covert and at times illegal[189] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveying, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations[190] FBI records show that 85% of COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed "subversive",[191] including communist and socialist organizations; ...




      The point is, there's a long history in the US of government responses to anti-capitalist movements, as these are generally not viewed favorably. There's a lot more that could be said (labor movements; class; race & racism; gender, to name a few related issues), but that's a rough overview.





      The second point I wanted to address was the conflation of anti-capitalist terms. I pointed out that two of the quotes only mentioned communism, but actually all of the above wiki pages can be found on the history of socialism in the US wiki page. I wanted to bring this up to point out that the government response conflates anti-capitalist movements. The same wiki page notes that




      The widespread use of the word "socialism" as a political epithet against the Obama government by its opponents caused National Director Frank Llewellyn to declare that "over the past 12 months, the Democratic Socialists of America has received more media attention than it has over the past 12 years"




      Even though the Obama administration and most leftists agreed that his administration was not socialist. The source for this claim is a Chicago Tribune article, which goes on to say:




      To most, socialist policies are synonymous with any expansion in government spending (although many capitalist nations funnel more of their gross domestic product through the public sector than the U.S. does). source




      Here's a foxnews article which defines socialism as communism, (though I think the author was trying to distinguish the two):




      There was a time in American politics when the term "socialism" conjured up images of the Cold War, the U.S.S.R, Joseph Stalin and Karl Marx, nuclear threats, government domination of private industry and gulags. For most Americans who came of age during the height of the Cold War, who remember being taught to hide under their desks at school, socialism – like communism – has long been a dirty word. source




      In summary, in the United States, pro-capitalism is the majority view (to varying degrees; this means different things to different people). That is, people endorsing communism, socialism, and democratic socialism are a small minority (i.e., as a ruling system of government). The distinction between communism, socialism, and democratic socialism is generally lost on anyone outside specific academic groups, and lost on the general a-politic public. It is only when you venture in to certain leftist groups that the distinction between these groups is recognized. (And maybe certain non-leftist groups too. The point is, a small minority.)





      Third, to go back to the original question:




      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      You're right that Sanders is not a socialist. But he's aware of the US sentiment of the term, as I outlined above. For example, an article on a Sanders speech :




      Throughout the decades, he [Sanders] argued, "socialist" has been a term conservatives deployed when Democrats do something popular:




      Almost everything [Roosevelt] proposed was called "socialist." I thought I would mention that just in passing. Social Security, which transformed life for the elderly in this country, was defined by his opponents as "socialist." The concept of the "minimum wage"—that workers had to be paid at least a certain amount of money for their labor—was seen as a radical intrusion into the marketplace and was described as "socialist."





      He has embraced this view of himself as someone that supports progressive social policies. Though he does tend to describe himself as "social democratic" when discussing the topic, and seems to be aware of the different in terms:




      Sanders: Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, often criticizes President Obama, incorrectly, for trying to push "European-style socialism," and McConnell says the American people don’t want it. First of all, of course, Obama is not trying to push European-style socialism. Second of all, I happen to believe that, if the American people understood the significant accomplishments that have taken place under social-democratic governments, democratic-socialist governments, labor governments throughout Europe, they would be shocked to know about those accomplishments. One of the goals of this campaign is to advance that understanding… source






      In summary, Sanders is called "socialist" because the US media in general describes policies that provide some kind of assistance (for example, food aid or health care) as socialist. This is just the current nature of the discussion at the national level. This is a rather US centric (i.e., isolated) understanding of the term "socialist" which is more properly understood in countries to the left of the United States.



      Sanders doesn't seem to object to the term if it is applied to him, but when discussing his views will refer to himself as "democratic socialist" instead of "socialist." And just as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is not democratic, neither is "democratic socialist" the same thing as "socialist." But as detailed above, this distinction is rarely made clear in US media.






      share|improve this answer
















      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      I think getting a quick history lesson to get some context might help explain how "socialist" is used in US media.



      First, I want to highlight the long history of anti-(anti-capitalism); second, show how anything anti-capitalism is generally conflated; and third, how this is the case in the present day.





      Discussing communism might seem like a detour, but bear with me for a moment. I'll start with The (first) Red Scare (1917-1920):




      Political scientist, and former member of the Communist Party Murray B. Levin wrote that the Red Scare was "a nationwide anti-radical hysteria provoked by a mounting fear and anxiety that a Bolshevik revolution in America was imminent—a revolution that would change Church, home, marriage, civility, and the American way of Life".




      Around the time of the second world war McCarthyism (~ second red scare) took hold:




      During the McCarthy era, hundreds of Americans were accused of being communists or communist sympathizers; they became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private industry panels, committees and agencies.




      You might notice that the above two quotes only reference communism. I'll discuss this a bit more below, but I want to continue the walk through history with a quote from wiki page on the history of socialism in the United States:




      COINTELPRO [(1956–1971)] was a series of covert and at times illegal[189] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveying, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations[190] FBI records show that 85% of COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed "subversive",[191] including communist and socialist organizations; ...




      The point is, there's a long history in the US of government responses to anti-capitalist movements, as these are generally not viewed favorably. There's a lot more that could be said (labor movements; class; race & racism; gender, to name a few related issues), but that's a rough overview.





      The second point I wanted to address was the conflation of anti-capitalist terms. I pointed out that two of the quotes only mentioned communism, but actually all of the above wiki pages can be found on the history of socialism in the US wiki page. I wanted to bring this up to point out that the government response conflates anti-capitalist movements. The same wiki page notes that




      The widespread use of the word "socialism" as a political epithet against the Obama government by its opponents caused National Director Frank Llewellyn to declare that "over the past 12 months, the Democratic Socialists of America has received more media attention than it has over the past 12 years"




      Even though the Obama administration and most leftists agreed that his administration was not socialist. The source for this claim is a Chicago Tribune article, which goes on to say:




      To most, socialist policies are synonymous with any expansion in government spending (although many capitalist nations funnel more of their gross domestic product through the public sector than the U.S. does). source




      Here's a foxnews article which defines socialism as communism, (though I think the author was trying to distinguish the two):




      There was a time in American politics when the term "socialism" conjured up images of the Cold War, the U.S.S.R, Joseph Stalin and Karl Marx, nuclear threats, government domination of private industry and gulags. For most Americans who came of age during the height of the Cold War, who remember being taught to hide under their desks at school, socialism – like communism – has long been a dirty word. source




      In summary, in the United States, pro-capitalism is the majority view (to varying degrees; this means different things to different people). That is, people endorsing communism, socialism, and democratic socialism are a small minority (i.e., as a ruling system of government). The distinction between communism, socialism, and democratic socialism is generally lost on anyone outside specific academic groups, and lost on the general a-politic public. It is only when you venture in to certain leftist groups that the distinction between these groups is recognized. (And maybe certain non-leftist groups too. The point is, a small minority.)





      Third, to go back to the original question:




      Why is it that Bernie Sanders always called a "socialist"?




      You're right that Sanders is not a socialist. But he's aware of the US sentiment of the term, as I outlined above. For example, an article on a Sanders speech :




      Throughout the decades, he [Sanders] argued, "socialist" has been a term conservatives deployed when Democrats do something popular:




      Almost everything [Roosevelt] proposed was called "socialist." I thought I would mention that just in passing. Social Security, which transformed life for the elderly in this country, was defined by his opponents as "socialist." The concept of the "minimum wage"—that workers had to be paid at least a certain amount of money for their labor—was seen as a radical intrusion into the marketplace and was described as "socialist."





      He has embraced this view of himself as someone that supports progressive social policies. Though he does tend to describe himself as "social democratic" when discussing the topic, and seems to be aware of the different in terms:




      Sanders: Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, often criticizes President Obama, incorrectly, for trying to push "European-style socialism," and McConnell says the American people don’t want it. First of all, of course, Obama is not trying to push European-style socialism. Second of all, I happen to believe that, if the American people understood the significant accomplishments that have taken place under social-democratic governments, democratic-socialist governments, labor governments throughout Europe, they would be shocked to know about those accomplishments. One of the goals of this campaign is to advance that understanding… source






      In summary, Sanders is called "socialist" because the US media in general describes policies that provide some kind of assistance (for example, food aid or health care) as socialist. This is just the current nature of the discussion at the national level. This is a rather US centric (i.e., isolated) understanding of the term "socialist" which is more properly understood in countries to the left of the United States.



      Sanders doesn't seem to object to the term if it is applied to him, but when discussing his views will refer to himself as "democratic socialist" instead of "socialist." And just as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is not democratic, neither is "democratic socialist" the same thing as "socialist." But as detailed above, this distinction is rarely made clear in US media.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Feb 22 at 18:54

























      answered Feb 22 at 16:02









      BurnsBABurnsBA

      898310




      898310








      • 15





        I downvoted for the simple reason that this is a needlessly longwinded answer that fails to point out Bernie Sanders is called a socialist because he calls himself a socialist. The fact that he isn't a socialist according to several previously well understood definitions doesn't negate the fact that this term is used to describe himself because he uses it.

        – Joe
        Feb 22 at 16:45






      • 14





        @Joe, I think you are confusing 1) when he doesn't make a pedantic argument against the "socialist" label and 2) how he describes himself as "democrat socialist". For example, Sanders saying (1) "The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist" and (2) "what democratic socialism means to me" both in this MSNBC article. I tried to make this point in my answer, but perhaps you have a suggestion for how I can clarify. msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism

        – BurnsBA
        Feb 22 at 17:03






      • 13





        @Joe, that's beyond pedantic, and demonstrably false. If you call yourself an anti-capitalist, it doesn't mean folk should conflate you as a capitalist because anti-capitalist has "capitalist" in the name. As an American, it really bums me out that we're generally so ignorant of semantics and actual meanings in things. Bernie could call himself anything and the right would decry him as a socialist due to his platform. And no, I'm not a leftist. I'm simply an American dude who's tired of ignorant rhetoric in my country's politics.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:08






      • 13





        And the fact that you found this answer too "long winded" is exactly WHY it's so tiresome talking to most other Americans about politics. Nobody wants foundational information, just an echo chamber that tells them they are right all the time.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:09






      • 6





        @Joe isn't fox mainstream then?

        – Mark
        2 days ago














      • 15





        I downvoted for the simple reason that this is a needlessly longwinded answer that fails to point out Bernie Sanders is called a socialist because he calls himself a socialist. The fact that he isn't a socialist according to several previously well understood definitions doesn't negate the fact that this term is used to describe himself because he uses it.

        – Joe
        Feb 22 at 16:45






      • 14





        @Joe, I think you are confusing 1) when he doesn't make a pedantic argument against the "socialist" label and 2) how he describes himself as "democrat socialist". For example, Sanders saying (1) "The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist" and (2) "what democratic socialism means to me" both in this MSNBC article. I tried to make this point in my answer, but perhaps you have a suggestion for how I can clarify. msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism

        – BurnsBA
        Feb 22 at 17:03






      • 13





        @Joe, that's beyond pedantic, and demonstrably false. If you call yourself an anti-capitalist, it doesn't mean folk should conflate you as a capitalist because anti-capitalist has "capitalist" in the name. As an American, it really bums me out that we're generally so ignorant of semantics and actual meanings in things. Bernie could call himself anything and the right would decry him as a socialist due to his platform. And no, I'm not a leftist. I'm simply an American dude who's tired of ignorant rhetoric in my country's politics.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:08






      • 13





        And the fact that you found this answer too "long winded" is exactly WHY it's so tiresome talking to most other Americans about politics. Nobody wants foundational information, just an echo chamber that tells them they are right all the time.

        – Jesse Williams
        Feb 22 at 20:09






      • 6





        @Joe isn't fox mainstream then?

        – Mark
        2 days ago








      15




      15





      I downvoted for the simple reason that this is a needlessly longwinded answer that fails to point out Bernie Sanders is called a socialist because he calls himself a socialist. The fact that he isn't a socialist according to several previously well understood definitions doesn't negate the fact that this term is used to describe himself because he uses it.

      – Joe
      Feb 22 at 16:45





      I downvoted for the simple reason that this is a needlessly longwinded answer that fails to point out Bernie Sanders is called a socialist because he calls himself a socialist. The fact that he isn't a socialist according to several previously well understood definitions doesn't negate the fact that this term is used to describe himself because he uses it.

      – Joe
      Feb 22 at 16:45




      14




      14





      @Joe, I think you are confusing 1) when he doesn't make a pedantic argument against the "socialist" label and 2) how he describes himself as "democrat socialist". For example, Sanders saying (1) "The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist" and (2) "what democratic socialism means to me" both in this MSNBC article. I tried to make this point in my answer, but perhaps you have a suggestion for how I can clarify. msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism

      – BurnsBA
      Feb 22 at 17:03





      @Joe, I think you are confusing 1) when he doesn't make a pedantic argument against the "socialist" label and 2) how he describes himself as "democrat socialist". For example, Sanders saying (1) "The next time you hear me attacked as a socialist" and (2) "what democratic socialism means to me" both in this MSNBC article. I tried to make this point in my answer, but perhaps you have a suggestion for how I can clarify. msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism

      – BurnsBA
      Feb 22 at 17:03




      13




      13





      @Joe, that's beyond pedantic, and demonstrably false. If you call yourself an anti-capitalist, it doesn't mean folk should conflate you as a capitalist because anti-capitalist has "capitalist" in the name. As an American, it really bums me out that we're generally so ignorant of semantics and actual meanings in things. Bernie could call himself anything and the right would decry him as a socialist due to his platform. And no, I'm not a leftist. I'm simply an American dude who's tired of ignorant rhetoric in my country's politics.

      – Jesse Williams
      Feb 22 at 20:08





      @Joe, that's beyond pedantic, and demonstrably false. If you call yourself an anti-capitalist, it doesn't mean folk should conflate you as a capitalist because anti-capitalist has "capitalist" in the name. As an American, it really bums me out that we're generally so ignorant of semantics and actual meanings in things. Bernie could call himself anything and the right would decry him as a socialist due to his platform. And no, I'm not a leftist. I'm simply an American dude who's tired of ignorant rhetoric in my country's politics.

      – Jesse Williams
      Feb 22 at 20:08




      13




      13





      And the fact that you found this answer too "long winded" is exactly WHY it's so tiresome talking to most other Americans about politics. Nobody wants foundational information, just an echo chamber that tells them they are right all the time.

      – Jesse Williams
      Feb 22 at 20:09





      And the fact that you found this answer too "long winded" is exactly WHY it's so tiresome talking to most other Americans about politics. Nobody wants foundational information, just an echo chamber that tells them they are right all the time.

      – Jesse Williams
      Feb 22 at 20:09




      6




      6





      @Joe isn't fox mainstream then?

      – Mark
      2 days ago





      @Joe isn't fox mainstream then?

      – Mark
      2 days ago











      31














      It seems likely that people call him a socialist because he's self-identified as one on multiple occasions.



      Sander Socialist



      and




      When he first won election to the House in 1990, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced his political identity. "I am a socialist and everyone knows that," Sanders said, responding to an ad that tried to link him to the regime of Fidel Castro.



      Washington Post: Bernie Sanders is an avowed socialist. 52 percent of Democrats are OK with that.




      etc.






      share|improve this answer
























      • That's a relevant answer, but even Sanders doesn't mean what Europeans mean when they say 'socialist'. His platform is social democratic by European standards. The word 'socialist' is simply a 'false friend'.

        – henning
        14 hours ago








      • 3





        @henning - If you go around calling yourself a socialist, people will call you one.

        – Valorum
        13 hours ago











      • I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying this word means something else in Europe than in the US, hence OP's confusion. When Americans say they drive a truck, they don't necessarily mean a 7 t vehicle with twin tires.

        – henning
        10 hours ago


















      31














      It seems likely that people call him a socialist because he's self-identified as one on multiple occasions.



      Sander Socialist



      and




      When he first won election to the House in 1990, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced his political identity. "I am a socialist and everyone knows that," Sanders said, responding to an ad that tried to link him to the regime of Fidel Castro.



      Washington Post: Bernie Sanders is an avowed socialist. 52 percent of Democrats are OK with that.




      etc.






      share|improve this answer
























      • That's a relevant answer, but even Sanders doesn't mean what Europeans mean when they say 'socialist'. His platform is social democratic by European standards. The word 'socialist' is simply a 'false friend'.

        – henning
        14 hours ago








      • 3





        @henning - If you go around calling yourself a socialist, people will call you one.

        – Valorum
        13 hours ago











      • I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying this word means something else in Europe than in the US, hence OP's confusion. When Americans say they drive a truck, they don't necessarily mean a 7 t vehicle with twin tires.

        – henning
        10 hours ago
















      31












      31








      31







      It seems likely that people call him a socialist because he's self-identified as one on multiple occasions.



      Sander Socialist



      and




      When he first won election to the House in 1990, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced his political identity. "I am a socialist and everyone knows that," Sanders said, responding to an ad that tried to link him to the regime of Fidel Castro.



      Washington Post: Bernie Sanders is an avowed socialist. 52 percent of Democrats are OK with that.




      etc.






      share|improve this answer













      It seems likely that people call him a socialist because he's self-identified as one on multiple occasions.



      Sander Socialist



      and




      When he first won election to the House in 1990, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced his political identity. "I am a socialist and everyone knows that," Sanders said, responding to an ad that tried to link him to the regime of Fidel Castro.



      Washington Post: Bernie Sanders is an avowed socialist. 52 percent of Democrats are OK with that.




      etc.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Feb 23 at 1:24









      ValorumValorum

      1,814916




      1,814916













      • That's a relevant answer, but even Sanders doesn't mean what Europeans mean when they say 'socialist'. His platform is social democratic by European standards. The word 'socialist' is simply a 'false friend'.

        – henning
        14 hours ago








      • 3





        @henning - If you go around calling yourself a socialist, people will call you one.

        – Valorum
        13 hours ago











      • I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying this word means something else in Europe than in the US, hence OP's confusion. When Americans say they drive a truck, they don't necessarily mean a 7 t vehicle with twin tires.

        – henning
        10 hours ago





















      • That's a relevant answer, but even Sanders doesn't mean what Europeans mean when they say 'socialist'. His platform is social democratic by European standards. The word 'socialist' is simply a 'false friend'.

        – henning
        14 hours ago








      • 3





        @henning - If you go around calling yourself a socialist, people will call you one.

        – Valorum
        13 hours ago











      • I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying this word means something else in Europe than in the US, hence OP's confusion. When Americans say they drive a truck, they don't necessarily mean a 7 t vehicle with twin tires.

        – henning
        10 hours ago



















      That's a relevant answer, but even Sanders doesn't mean what Europeans mean when they say 'socialist'. His platform is social democratic by European standards. The word 'socialist' is simply a 'false friend'.

      – henning
      14 hours ago







      That's a relevant answer, but even Sanders doesn't mean what Europeans mean when they say 'socialist'. His platform is social democratic by European standards. The word 'socialist' is simply a 'false friend'.

      – henning
      14 hours ago






      3




      3





      @henning - If you go around calling yourself a socialist, people will call you one.

      – Valorum
      13 hours ago





      @henning - If you go around calling yourself a socialist, people will call you one.

      – Valorum
      13 hours ago













      I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying this word means something else in Europe than in the US, hence OP's confusion. When Americans say they drive a truck, they don't necessarily mean a 7 t vehicle with twin tires.

      – henning
      10 hours ago







      I don't disagree with you. I'm just saying this word means something else in Europe than in the US, hence OP's confusion. When Americans say they drive a truck, they don't necessarily mean a 7 t vehicle with twin tires.

      – henning
      10 hours ago













      15














      Folks who support the view that Sanders is actually socialist frequently point to this quote from him way back in 1987:




      Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production, it
      means decentralization, it means involving people in their work.
      Rather than having bosses and workers it means having democratic
      control over the factories and shops to as great a degree as you can.




      Sanders continues to demonstrate admiration for Eugene V. Debs, the most prominent Socialist candidate in the history of the United States.



      But yes, if we focus on his major policy proposals and imagine Sanders in a multiparty parliamentary democracy, the label "Social Democrat" would be a better fit.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        Interesting quote, but do folks actually frequently refer to his 1987 quote?

        – gerrit
        yesterday











      • @gerrit I noticed this quote all over non-public Facebook comments the day he announced. If I search "Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production" on google I find 167 hits, and on the top page at least, they all are about Bernie Sanders.

        – Brian Z
        20 hours ago






      • 3





        I would consider 167 Google hits to be really a rather small number.

        – gerrit
        18 hours ago











      • If he said that, he's grossly wrong: democracy doesn't mean that in any dictionary. Perhaps the quotation is wrong, and that could explain its low hit number: in some circles, socialism may mean this. But what he's really describing is Anarcho-syndicalism.

        – Zeus
        5 hours ago


















      15














      Folks who support the view that Sanders is actually socialist frequently point to this quote from him way back in 1987:




      Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production, it
      means decentralization, it means involving people in their work.
      Rather than having bosses and workers it means having democratic
      control over the factories and shops to as great a degree as you can.




      Sanders continues to demonstrate admiration for Eugene V. Debs, the most prominent Socialist candidate in the history of the United States.



      But yes, if we focus on his major policy proposals and imagine Sanders in a multiparty parliamentary democracy, the label "Social Democrat" would be a better fit.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        Interesting quote, but do folks actually frequently refer to his 1987 quote?

        – gerrit
        yesterday











      • @gerrit I noticed this quote all over non-public Facebook comments the day he announced. If I search "Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production" on google I find 167 hits, and on the top page at least, they all are about Bernie Sanders.

        – Brian Z
        20 hours ago






      • 3





        I would consider 167 Google hits to be really a rather small number.

        – gerrit
        18 hours ago











      • If he said that, he's grossly wrong: democracy doesn't mean that in any dictionary. Perhaps the quotation is wrong, and that could explain its low hit number: in some circles, socialism may mean this. But what he's really describing is Anarcho-syndicalism.

        – Zeus
        5 hours ago
















      15












      15








      15







      Folks who support the view that Sanders is actually socialist frequently point to this quote from him way back in 1987:




      Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production, it
      means decentralization, it means involving people in their work.
      Rather than having bosses and workers it means having democratic
      control over the factories and shops to as great a degree as you can.




      Sanders continues to demonstrate admiration for Eugene V. Debs, the most prominent Socialist candidate in the history of the United States.



      But yes, if we focus on his major policy proposals and imagine Sanders in a multiparty parliamentary democracy, the label "Social Democrat" would be a better fit.






      share|improve this answer















      Folks who support the view that Sanders is actually socialist frequently point to this quote from him way back in 1987:




      Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production, it
      means decentralization, it means involving people in their work.
      Rather than having bosses and workers it means having democratic
      control over the factories and shops to as great a degree as you can.




      Sanders continues to demonstrate admiration for Eugene V. Debs, the most prominent Socialist candidate in the history of the United States.



      But yes, if we focus on his major policy proposals and imagine Sanders in a multiparty parliamentary democracy, the label "Social Democrat" would be a better fit.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Feb 22 at 19:23

























      answered Feb 22 at 18:30









      Brian ZBrian Z

      2,588816




      2,588816








      • 2





        Interesting quote, but do folks actually frequently refer to his 1987 quote?

        – gerrit
        yesterday











      • @gerrit I noticed this quote all over non-public Facebook comments the day he announced. If I search "Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production" on google I find 167 hits, and on the top page at least, they all are about Bernie Sanders.

        – Brian Z
        20 hours ago






      • 3





        I would consider 167 Google hits to be really a rather small number.

        – gerrit
        18 hours ago











      • If he said that, he's grossly wrong: democracy doesn't mean that in any dictionary. Perhaps the quotation is wrong, and that could explain its low hit number: in some circles, socialism may mean this. But what he's really describing is Anarcho-syndicalism.

        – Zeus
        5 hours ago
















      • 2





        Interesting quote, but do folks actually frequently refer to his 1987 quote?

        – gerrit
        yesterday











      • @gerrit I noticed this quote all over non-public Facebook comments the day he announced. If I search "Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production" on google I find 167 hits, and on the top page at least, they all are about Bernie Sanders.

        – Brian Z
        20 hours ago






      • 3





        I would consider 167 Google hits to be really a rather small number.

        – gerrit
        18 hours ago











      • If he said that, he's grossly wrong: democracy doesn't mean that in any dictionary. Perhaps the quotation is wrong, and that could explain its low hit number: in some circles, socialism may mean this. But what he's really describing is Anarcho-syndicalism.

        – Zeus
        5 hours ago










      2




      2





      Interesting quote, but do folks actually frequently refer to his 1987 quote?

      – gerrit
      yesterday





      Interesting quote, but do folks actually frequently refer to his 1987 quote?

      – gerrit
      yesterday













      @gerrit I noticed this quote all over non-public Facebook comments the day he announced. If I search "Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production" on google I find 167 hits, and on the top page at least, they all are about Bernie Sanders.

      – Brian Z
      20 hours ago





      @gerrit I noticed this quote all over non-public Facebook comments the day he announced. If I search "Democracy means public ownership of the major means of production" on google I find 167 hits, and on the top page at least, they all are about Bernie Sanders.

      – Brian Z
      20 hours ago




      3




      3





      I would consider 167 Google hits to be really a rather small number.

      – gerrit
      18 hours ago





      I would consider 167 Google hits to be really a rather small number.

      – gerrit
      18 hours ago













      If he said that, he's grossly wrong: democracy doesn't mean that in any dictionary. Perhaps the quotation is wrong, and that could explain its low hit number: in some circles, socialism may mean this. But what he's really describing is Anarcho-syndicalism.

      – Zeus
      5 hours ago







      If he said that, he's grossly wrong: democracy doesn't mean that in any dictionary. Perhaps the quotation is wrong, and that could explain its low hit number: in some circles, socialism may mean this. But what he's really describing is Anarcho-syndicalism.

      – Zeus
      5 hours ago













      11














      I think there's an important distinction to be made in the examples you noted.



      The left-of-center news outlets actually make an effort to call him by his chosen name of "Democratic Socialist."





      • The Hill (left-center)


      • The Nation (left)


      It's the right-wing sources that conflate the terminology.





      • Daily Mail (right, questionable source)


      • Newsmax (right)


      • Fox News (right)


      (Of course, by European standard, all of these sources would probably be considered a little more to the right than the US ranks them.)



      The right-wing likes to use the word socialism as a pejorative, capitalizing on how little Americans know about socialism in the non-pejorative sense, and how much disinformation and conflations has been made about it in the past. If you live in the US, go ahead, try asking random people you know what socialism is. You'll probably get some really funny answers, like "Putin is a socialist" as I do when the topic comes up.






      share|improve this answer




























        11














        I think there's an important distinction to be made in the examples you noted.



        The left-of-center news outlets actually make an effort to call him by his chosen name of "Democratic Socialist."





        • The Hill (left-center)


        • The Nation (left)


        It's the right-wing sources that conflate the terminology.





        • Daily Mail (right, questionable source)


        • Newsmax (right)


        • Fox News (right)


        (Of course, by European standard, all of these sources would probably be considered a little more to the right than the US ranks them.)



        The right-wing likes to use the word socialism as a pejorative, capitalizing on how little Americans know about socialism in the non-pejorative sense, and how much disinformation and conflations has been made about it in the past. If you live in the US, go ahead, try asking random people you know what socialism is. You'll probably get some really funny answers, like "Putin is a socialist" as I do when the topic comes up.






        share|improve this answer


























          11












          11








          11







          I think there's an important distinction to be made in the examples you noted.



          The left-of-center news outlets actually make an effort to call him by his chosen name of "Democratic Socialist."





          • The Hill (left-center)


          • The Nation (left)


          It's the right-wing sources that conflate the terminology.





          • Daily Mail (right, questionable source)


          • Newsmax (right)


          • Fox News (right)


          (Of course, by European standard, all of these sources would probably be considered a little more to the right than the US ranks them.)



          The right-wing likes to use the word socialism as a pejorative, capitalizing on how little Americans know about socialism in the non-pejorative sense, and how much disinformation and conflations has been made about it in the past. If you live in the US, go ahead, try asking random people you know what socialism is. You'll probably get some really funny answers, like "Putin is a socialist" as I do when the topic comes up.






          share|improve this answer













          I think there's an important distinction to be made in the examples you noted.



          The left-of-center news outlets actually make an effort to call him by his chosen name of "Democratic Socialist."





          • The Hill (left-center)


          • The Nation (left)


          It's the right-wing sources that conflate the terminology.





          • Daily Mail (right, questionable source)


          • Newsmax (right)


          • Fox News (right)


          (Of course, by European standard, all of these sources would probably be considered a little more to the right than the US ranks them.)



          The right-wing likes to use the word socialism as a pejorative, capitalizing on how little Americans know about socialism in the non-pejorative sense, and how much disinformation and conflations has been made about it in the past. If you live in the US, go ahead, try asking random people you know what socialism is. You'll probably get some really funny answers, like "Putin is a socialist" as I do when the topic comes up.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Feb 22 at 20:50









          CrackpotCrocodileCrackpotCrocodile

          2,080422




          2,080422























              7














              The meaning of the word socialist changes by country and by era. Social democratic is especially crucial in Germany because of the national-socialist phenomenon. The word is a popular ideal which was abused by despots and which lost favor after the 80's, mostly for it's use by despots, it's vagueness and lack of concencus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_communist_states_and_socialist_states



              Socialism in the 20th century started out as an ideal term for debate of human rights of expression, minimum wage, trade unions, in the 1920s.
              The 1920's ideal is how I was introduced to the concept of socialism in philosophy and history, and same goes for Bernie Sanders too, probably.



              Socialism changes a lot by decade and Bernie probably associates socialism with the ideals of his father's generation from the 30's, rather than the recent historical corruptions of socialism used by Venezuela, Germany, Burma, Romania, Lybia and others.



              Usage frequency of various political terms according to Googgle Ngram Search:



              Ngram chart






              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                How precisely is the ngram supporting any of the argument you gave? Not that I assume that it would be wrong; I just feel the diagram is just a show-off that adds no substantial information.

                – antipattern
                2 days ago








              • 3





                I don't understand this answer. Venezuela and Germany?

                – gerrit
                yesterday













              • It shows the meaning of the word socialist! the political philosophical word of the 1920's and 30's was very prevalent around in 1938 as it was corrupted by the NAZIs, and then it peaked in the middle of the cold war, so it demonstrates why a german would see him as a "social democrat at best". Venezuela and Germany have both had repressive socialist autocracies relatively recently, as has Cuba, Russia, China, and many others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

                – com.prehensible
                20 hours ago


















              7














              The meaning of the word socialist changes by country and by era. Social democratic is especially crucial in Germany because of the national-socialist phenomenon. The word is a popular ideal which was abused by despots and which lost favor after the 80's, mostly for it's use by despots, it's vagueness and lack of concencus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_communist_states_and_socialist_states



              Socialism in the 20th century started out as an ideal term for debate of human rights of expression, minimum wage, trade unions, in the 1920s.
              The 1920's ideal is how I was introduced to the concept of socialism in philosophy and history, and same goes for Bernie Sanders too, probably.



              Socialism changes a lot by decade and Bernie probably associates socialism with the ideals of his father's generation from the 30's, rather than the recent historical corruptions of socialism used by Venezuela, Germany, Burma, Romania, Lybia and others.



              Usage frequency of various political terms according to Googgle Ngram Search:



              Ngram chart






              share|improve this answer





















              • 1





                How precisely is the ngram supporting any of the argument you gave? Not that I assume that it would be wrong; I just feel the diagram is just a show-off that adds no substantial information.

                – antipattern
                2 days ago








              • 3





                I don't understand this answer. Venezuela and Germany?

                – gerrit
                yesterday













              • It shows the meaning of the word socialist! the political philosophical word of the 1920's and 30's was very prevalent around in 1938 as it was corrupted by the NAZIs, and then it peaked in the middle of the cold war, so it demonstrates why a german would see him as a "social democrat at best". Venezuela and Germany have both had repressive socialist autocracies relatively recently, as has Cuba, Russia, China, and many others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

                – com.prehensible
                20 hours ago
















              7












              7








              7







              The meaning of the word socialist changes by country and by era. Social democratic is especially crucial in Germany because of the national-socialist phenomenon. The word is a popular ideal which was abused by despots and which lost favor after the 80's, mostly for it's use by despots, it's vagueness and lack of concencus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_communist_states_and_socialist_states



              Socialism in the 20th century started out as an ideal term for debate of human rights of expression, minimum wage, trade unions, in the 1920s.
              The 1920's ideal is how I was introduced to the concept of socialism in philosophy and history, and same goes for Bernie Sanders too, probably.



              Socialism changes a lot by decade and Bernie probably associates socialism with the ideals of his father's generation from the 30's, rather than the recent historical corruptions of socialism used by Venezuela, Germany, Burma, Romania, Lybia and others.



              Usage frequency of various political terms according to Googgle Ngram Search:



              Ngram chart






              share|improve this answer















              The meaning of the word socialist changes by country and by era. Social democratic is especially crucial in Germany because of the national-socialist phenomenon. The word is a popular ideal which was abused by despots and which lost favor after the 80's, mostly for it's use by despots, it's vagueness and lack of concencus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_communist_states_and_socialist_states



              Socialism in the 20th century started out as an ideal term for debate of human rights of expression, minimum wage, trade unions, in the 1920s.
              The 1920's ideal is how I was introduced to the concept of socialism in philosophy and history, and same goes for Bernie Sanders too, probably.



              Socialism changes a lot by decade and Bernie probably associates socialism with the ideals of his father's generation from the 30's, rather than the recent historical corruptions of socialism used by Venezuela, Germany, Burma, Romania, Lybia and others.



              Usage frequency of various political terms according to Googgle Ngram Search:



              Ngram chart







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 26 mins ago

























              answered 2 days ago









              com.prehensiblecom.prehensible

              516311




              516311








              • 1





                How precisely is the ngram supporting any of the argument you gave? Not that I assume that it would be wrong; I just feel the diagram is just a show-off that adds no substantial information.

                – antipattern
                2 days ago








              • 3





                I don't understand this answer. Venezuela and Germany?

                – gerrit
                yesterday













              • It shows the meaning of the word socialist! the political philosophical word of the 1920's and 30's was very prevalent around in 1938 as it was corrupted by the NAZIs, and then it peaked in the middle of the cold war, so it demonstrates why a german would see him as a "social democrat at best". Venezuela and Germany have both had repressive socialist autocracies relatively recently, as has Cuba, Russia, China, and many others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

                – com.prehensible
                20 hours ago
















              • 1





                How precisely is the ngram supporting any of the argument you gave? Not that I assume that it would be wrong; I just feel the diagram is just a show-off that adds no substantial information.

                – antipattern
                2 days ago








              • 3





                I don't understand this answer. Venezuela and Germany?

                – gerrit
                yesterday













              • It shows the meaning of the word socialist! the political philosophical word of the 1920's and 30's was very prevalent around in 1938 as it was corrupted by the NAZIs, and then it peaked in the middle of the cold war, so it demonstrates why a german would see him as a "social democrat at best". Venezuela and Germany have both had repressive socialist autocracies relatively recently, as has Cuba, Russia, China, and many others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

                – com.prehensible
                20 hours ago










              1




              1





              How precisely is the ngram supporting any of the argument you gave? Not that I assume that it would be wrong; I just feel the diagram is just a show-off that adds no substantial information.

              – antipattern
              2 days ago







              How precisely is the ngram supporting any of the argument you gave? Not that I assume that it would be wrong; I just feel the diagram is just a show-off that adds no substantial information.

              – antipattern
              2 days ago






              3




              3





              I don't understand this answer. Venezuela and Germany?

              – gerrit
              yesterday







              I don't understand this answer. Venezuela and Germany?

              – gerrit
              yesterday















              It shows the meaning of the word socialist! the political philosophical word of the 1920's and 30's was very prevalent around in 1938 as it was corrupted by the NAZIs, and then it peaked in the middle of the cold war, so it demonstrates why a german would see him as a "social democrat at best". Venezuela and Germany have both had repressive socialist autocracies relatively recently, as has Cuba, Russia, China, and many others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

              – com.prehensible
              20 hours ago







              It shows the meaning of the word socialist! the political philosophical word of the 1920's and 30's was very prevalent around in 1938 as it was corrupted by the NAZIs, and then it peaked in the middle of the cold war, so it demonstrates why a german would see him as a "social democrat at best". Venezuela and Germany have both had repressive socialist autocracies relatively recently, as has Cuba, Russia, China, and many others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

              – com.prehensible
              20 hours ago













              4














              During the time he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, Bernie Sanders referred to himself as a socialist, and was referred to that way in the press. (source: Wikipedia). In his youth, he had been a member of the Young Socialists of America. To my knowledge, that group was socialist, not social democrat, or democratic socialist.



              His political thinking may have evolved over the decades, or he may have found a new way to package the same ideas. However, it remains true that the label socialist is one that he took on himself and not one that was pinned on him by detractors.



              When he describes his overall vision today, he often cites the model of Nordic Socialism as the kind of society he is aiming for. However, it's important to realize that the Scandinavian countries are not socialist, and their leaderships are quite insistent about this. Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated.



              Tax rates on companies are comparable to similar rates in the USA, considered a capitalist economy. So if that is what he is really aiming for, it would be appropriate to refer to him as something other than a "Democratic Socialist". It's unclear exactly what is meant by Democratic Socialism in any event. It depends on who you ask.






              share|improve this answer
























              • "Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated." That statement is why many Americans laugh when Europeans claim they aren't socialist. Just because the government "lets" people own companies, the government is still essentially dictating how the companies operate through the heavy regulation. There's not a lot of difference between that and the government outright controlling the companies. It's like a parent who "gives" their teenage child a car but reserves the right to take the car away from them at any time. IOW, the child doesn't really own the car.

                – Dunk
                10 hours ago


















              4














              During the time he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, Bernie Sanders referred to himself as a socialist, and was referred to that way in the press. (source: Wikipedia). In his youth, he had been a member of the Young Socialists of America. To my knowledge, that group was socialist, not social democrat, or democratic socialist.



              His political thinking may have evolved over the decades, or he may have found a new way to package the same ideas. However, it remains true that the label socialist is one that he took on himself and not one that was pinned on him by detractors.



              When he describes his overall vision today, he often cites the model of Nordic Socialism as the kind of society he is aiming for. However, it's important to realize that the Scandinavian countries are not socialist, and their leaderships are quite insistent about this. Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated.



              Tax rates on companies are comparable to similar rates in the USA, considered a capitalist economy. So if that is what he is really aiming for, it would be appropriate to refer to him as something other than a "Democratic Socialist". It's unclear exactly what is meant by Democratic Socialism in any event. It depends on who you ask.






              share|improve this answer
























              • "Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated." That statement is why many Americans laugh when Europeans claim they aren't socialist. Just because the government "lets" people own companies, the government is still essentially dictating how the companies operate through the heavy regulation. There's not a lot of difference between that and the government outright controlling the companies. It's like a parent who "gives" their teenage child a car but reserves the right to take the car away from them at any time. IOW, the child doesn't really own the car.

                – Dunk
                10 hours ago
















              4












              4








              4







              During the time he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, Bernie Sanders referred to himself as a socialist, and was referred to that way in the press. (source: Wikipedia). In his youth, he had been a member of the Young Socialists of America. To my knowledge, that group was socialist, not social democrat, or democratic socialist.



              His political thinking may have evolved over the decades, or he may have found a new way to package the same ideas. However, it remains true that the label socialist is one that he took on himself and not one that was pinned on him by detractors.



              When he describes his overall vision today, he often cites the model of Nordic Socialism as the kind of society he is aiming for. However, it's important to realize that the Scandinavian countries are not socialist, and their leaderships are quite insistent about this. Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated.



              Tax rates on companies are comparable to similar rates in the USA, considered a capitalist economy. So if that is what he is really aiming for, it would be appropriate to refer to him as something other than a "Democratic Socialist". It's unclear exactly what is meant by Democratic Socialism in any event. It depends on who you ask.






              share|improve this answer













              During the time he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, Bernie Sanders referred to himself as a socialist, and was referred to that way in the press. (source: Wikipedia). In his youth, he had been a member of the Young Socialists of America. To my knowledge, that group was socialist, not social democrat, or democratic socialist.



              His political thinking may have evolved over the decades, or he may have found a new way to package the same ideas. However, it remains true that the label socialist is one that he took on himself and not one that was pinned on him by detractors.



              When he describes his overall vision today, he often cites the model of Nordic Socialism as the kind of society he is aiming for. However, it's important to realize that the Scandinavian countries are not socialist, and their leaderships are quite insistent about this. Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated.



              Tax rates on companies are comparable to similar rates in the USA, considered a capitalist economy. So if that is what he is really aiming for, it would be appropriate to refer to him as something other than a "Democratic Socialist". It's unclear exactly what is meant by Democratic Socialism in any event. It depends on who you ask.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered yesterday









              Walter MittyWalter Mitty

              1705




              1705













              • "Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated." That statement is why many Americans laugh when Europeans claim they aren't socialist. Just because the government "lets" people own companies, the government is still essentially dictating how the companies operate through the heavy regulation. There's not a lot of difference between that and the government outright controlling the companies. It's like a parent who "gives" their teenage child a car but reserves the right to take the car away from them at any time. IOW, the child doesn't really own the car.

                – Dunk
                10 hours ago





















              • "Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated." That statement is why many Americans laugh when Europeans claim they aren't socialist. Just because the government "lets" people own companies, the government is still essentially dictating how the companies operate through the heavy regulation. There's not a lot of difference between that and the government outright controlling the companies. It's like a parent who "gives" their teenage child a car but reserves the right to take the car away from them at any time. IOW, the child doesn't really own the car.

                – Dunk
                10 hours ago



















              "Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated." That statement is why many Americans laugh when Europeans claim they aren't socialist. Just because the government "lets" people own companies, the government is still essentially dictating how the companies operate through the heavy regulation. There's not a lot of difference between that and the government outright controlling the companies. It's like a parent who "gives" their teenage child a car but reserves the right to take the car away from them at any time. IOW, the child doesn't really own the car.

              – Dunk
              10 hours ago







              "Most of industry remains under private ownership, albeit heavily regulated." That statement is why many Americans laugh when Europeans claim they aren't socialist. Just because the government "lets" people own companies, the government is still essentially dictating how the companies operate through the heavy regulation. There's not a lot of difference between that and the government outright controlling the companies. It's like a parent who "gives" their teenage child a car but reserves the right to take the car away from them at any time. IOW, the child doesn't really own the car.

              – Dunk
              10 hours ago













              1














              American political taxonomy is a bit different from that of other countries, so it should come as no surprise that you're puzzled.



              The primary axis for American political discussion is the degree of power wielded by the central (Federal) government. The (rather ill-defined) central position is shared by Democrats and Republicans, and advancing to the Left the major divisions are: Liberal/Democrat (the two are often interchangeable), Socialist, and Communist. While Europeans have a larger, more nuanced, list of variations, the US 2-party system has pretty well subsumed all of the European distinctions into Liberal/Democrat or Socialist. Within the US, socialism is generally seen as a system which gives enormous power to the central government without the totalitarian flavor of Communism. Consequently, for Bernie to identify himself as socialist simply means that he has advocated a greater role for the Federal government than is currently accepted by the Democratic party. Within the usual usage of the terms, he could have chosen either ultra-liberal or socialist. He picked socialist. Bernie made his political debut as mayor of Burlington, Vt in 1981, and it was at that time that he described himself as socialist, and the term was picked up by the newspapers. Given that these were the Reagan years, this did help to give him a well-defined political identity. To the amazement and relief of the city, he was apparently a good mayor, and did not let ideology get in the way of running the city. The relief was not shared by the Republican and Democratic leaders in Burlington, who were unable to get him out until he chose to run for the House of Representatives.



              At about the same time, the US (including Vermont) went through a condominium conversion boom/bust cycle, and the rise of awareness of genital Herpes. This gave rise to the Burlington political joke:




              Q - Which one of the following items does not belong on this list?



              A) Gonorrhea B) Bernie Sanders C) Herpes D) A condo in St. Albans



              A - Gonorrhea. You can get rid of Gonorrhea.







              share|improve this answer






























                1














                American political taxonomy is a bit different from that of other countries, so it should come as no surprise that you're puzzled.



                The primary axis for American political discussion is the degree of power wielded by the central (Federal) government. The (rather ill-defined) central position is shared by Democrats and Republicans, and advancing to the Left the major divisions are: Liberal/Democrat (the two are often interchangeable), Socialist, and Communist. While Europeans have a larger, more nuanced, list of variations, the US 2-party system has pretty well subsumed all of the European distinctions into Liberal/Democrat or Socialist. Within the US, socialism is generally seen as a system which gives enormous power to the central government without the totalitarian flavor of Communism. Consequently, for Bernie to identify himself as socialist simply means that he has advocated a greater role for the Federal government than is currently accepted by the Democratic party. Within the usual usage of the terms, he could have chosen either ultra-liberal or socialist. He picked socialist. Bernie made his political debut as mayor of Burlington, Vt in 1981, and it was at that time that he described himself as socialist, and the term was picked up by the newspapers. Given that these were the Reagan years, this did help to give him a well-defined political identity. To the amazement and relief of the city, he was apparently a good mayor, and did not let ideology get in the way of running the city. The relief was not shared by the Republican and Democratic leaders in Burlington, who were unable to get him out until he chose to run for the House of Representatives.



                At about the same time, the US (including Vermont) went through a condominium conversion boom/bust cycle, and the rise of awareness of genital Herpes. This gave rise to the Burlington political joke:




                Q - Which one of the following items does not belong on this list?



                A) Gonorrhea B) Bernie Sanders C) Herpes D) A condo in St. Albans



                A - Gonorrhea. You can get rid of Gonorrhea.







                share|improve this answer




























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  American political taxonomy is a bit different from that of other countries, so it should come as no surprise that you're puzzled.



                  The primary axis for American political discussion is the degree of power wielded by the central (Federal) government. The (rather ill-defined) central position is shared by Democrats and Republicans, and advancing to the Left the major divisions are: Liberal/Democrat (the two are often interchangeable), Socialist, and Communist. While Europeans have a larger, more nuanced, list of variations, the US 2-party system has pretty well subsumed all of the European distinctions into Liberal/Democrat or Socialist. Within the US, socialism is generally seen as a system which gives enormous power to the central government without the totalitarian flavor of Communism. Consequently, for Bernie to identify himself as socialist simply means that he has advocated a greater role for the Federal government than is currently accepted by the Democratic party. Within the usual usage of the terms, he could have chosen either ultra-liberal or socialist. He picked socialist. Bernie made his political debut as mayor of Burlington, Vt in 1981, and it was at that time that he described himself as socialist, and the term was picked up by the newspapers. Given that these were the Reagan years, this did help to give him a well-defined political identity. To the amazement and relief of the city, he was apparently a good mayor, and did not let ideology get in the way of running the city. The relief was not shared by the Republican and Democratic leaders in Burlington, who were unable to get him out until he chose to run for the House of Representatives.



                  At about the same time, the US (including Vermont) went through a condominium conversion boom/bust cycle, and the rise of awareness of genital Herpes. This gave rise to the Burlington political joke:




                  Q - Which one of the following items does not belong on this list?



                  A) Gonorrhea B) Bernie Sanders C) Herpes D) A condo in St. Albans



                  A - Gonorrhea. You can get rid of Gonorrhea.







                  share|improve this answer















                  American political taxonomy is a bit different from that of other countries, so it should come as no surprise that you're puzzled.



                  The primary axis for American political discussion is the degree of power wielded by the central (Federal) government. The (rather ill-defined) central position is shared by Democrats and Republicans, and advancing to the Left the major divisions are: Liberal/Democrat (the two are often interchangeable), Socialist, and Communist. While Europeans have a larger, more nuanced, list of variations, the US 2-party system has pretty well subsumed all of the European distinctions into Liberal/Democrat or Socialist. Within the US, socialism is generally seen as a system which gives enormous power to the central government without the totalitarian flavor of Communism. Consequently, for Bernie to identify himself as socialist simply means that he has advocated a greater role for the Federal government than is currently accepted by the Democratic party. Within the usual usage of the terms, he could have chosen either ultra-liberal or socialist. He picked socialist. Bernie made his political debut as mayor of Burlington, Vt in 1981, and it was at that time that he described himself as socialist, and the term was picked up by the newspapers. Given that these were the Reagan years, this did help to give him a well-defined political identity. To the amazement and relief of the city, he was apparently a good mayor, and did not let ideology get in the way of running the city. The relief was not shared by the Republican and Democratic leaders in Burlington, who were unable to get him out until he chose to run for the House of Representatives.



                  At about the same time, the US (including Vermont) went through a condominium conversion boom/bust cycle, and the rise of awareness of genital Herpes. This gave rise to the Burlington political joke:




                  Q - Which one of the following items does not belong on this list?



                  A) Gonorrhea B) Bernie Sanders C) Herpes D) A condo in St. Albans



                  A - Gonorrhea. You can get rid of Gonorrhea.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  WhatRoughBeastWhatRoughBeast

                  1685




                  1685























                      -4














                      The definition of socialism is




                      Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.




                      Bernie Sanders wants free healthcare and free college, which means it is run by the government. When the government is providing the services of health and education, that is socialism. In the above definition, I assume goods also means "goods and services".






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 22





                        Public goods can be provisioned without the government owning the means of production. "Free college" and "free healthcare" proposals typically consist of the government paying for things on behalf of the consumer, not the federal government owning every college and hospital in America.

                        – Joe
                        Feb 22 at 18:31








                      • 13





                        I didn't know that most industrialized countries (which provide some form of free healthcare and free education) are socialist countries. Please call Theresa May and tell her that she leads a socialist government. :-)

                        – Martin Schröder
                        Feb 22 at 19:52








                      • 17





                        Why is free college socialism and free K-12 school not? Hmm....

                        – Geobits
                        Feb 22 at 21:12






                      • 4





                        In the US (or everywhere?) most of the "means of producing" military safety are owned by the government

                        – Hagen von Eitzen
                        Feb 22 at 21:44






                      • 13





                        This answer is fallacious. Jazz is defined as music characterized by polyphony, syncopation, and improvization. Beethoven's music contains these elements, therefore Beethoven is a jazz composer. Silly.

                        – barbecue
                        Feb 22 at 23:50
















                      -4














                      The definition of socialism is




                      Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.




                      Bernie Sanders wants free healthcare and free college, which means it is run by the government. When the government is providing the services of health and education, that is socialism. In the above definition, I assume goods also means "goods and services".






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 22





                        Public goods can be provisioned without the government owning the means of production. "Free college" and "free healthcare" proposals typically consist of the government paying for things on behalf of the consumer, not the federal government owning every college and hospital in America.

                        – Joe
                        Feb 22 at 18:31








                      • 13





                        I didn't know that most industrialized countries (which provide some form of free healthcare and free education) are socialist countries. Please call Theresa May and tell her that she leads a socialist government. :-)

                        – Martin Schröder
                        Feb 22 at 19:52








                      • 17





                        Why is free college socialism and free K-12 school not? Hmm....

                        – Geobits
                        Feb 22 at 21:12






                      • 4





                        In the US (or everywhere?) most of the "means of producing" military safety are owned by the government

                        – Hagen von Eitzen
                        Feb 22 at 21:44






                      • 13





                        This answer is fallacious. Jazz is defined as music characterized by polyphony, syncopation, and improvization. Beethoven's music contains these elements, therefore Beethoven is a jazz composer. Silly.

                        – barbecue
                        Feb 22 at 23:50














                      -4












                      -4








                      -4







                      The definition of socialism is




                      Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.




                      Bernie Sanders wants free healthcare and free college, which means it is run by the government. When the government is providing the services of health and education, that is socialism. In the above definition, I assume goods also means "goods and services".






                      share|improve this answer













                      The definition of socialism is




                      Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.




                      Bernie Sanders wants free healthcare and free college, which means it is run by the government. When the government is providing the services of health and education, that is socialism. In the above definition, I assume goods also means "goods and services".







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Feb 22 at 18:13









                      ChloeChloe

                      3,72621640




                      3,72621640








                      • 22





                        Public goods can be provisioned without the government owning the means of production. "Free college" and "free healthcare" proposals typically consist of the government paying for things on behalf of the consumer, not the federal government owning every college and hospital in America.

                        – Joe
                        Feb 22 at 18:31








                      • 13





                        I didn't know that most industrialized countries (which provide some form of free healthcare and free education) are socialist countries. Please call Theresa May and tell her that she leads a socialist government. :-)

                        – Martin Schröder
                        Feb 22 at 19:52








                      • 17





                        Why is free college socialism and free K-12 school not? Hmm....

                        – Geobits
                        Feb 22 at 21:12






                      • 4





                        In the US (or everywhere?) most of the "means of producing" military safety are owned by the government

                        – Hagen von Eitzen
                        Feb 22 at 21:44






                      • 13





                        This answer is fallacious. Jazz is defined as music characterized by polyphony, syncopation, and improvization. Beethoven's music contains these elements, therefore Beethoven is a jazz composer. Silly.

                        – barbecue
                        Feb 22 at 23:50














                      • 22





                        Public goods can be provisioned without the government owning the means of production. "Free college" and "free healthcare" proposals typically consist of the government paying for things on behalf of the consumer, not the federal government owning every college and hospital in America.

                        – Joe
                        Feb 22 at 18:31








                      • 13





                        I didn't know that most industrialized countries (which provide some form of free healthcare and free education) are socialist countries. Please call Theresa May and tell her that she leads a socialist government. :-)

                        – Martin Schröder
                        Feb 22 at 19:52








                      • 17





                        Why is free college socialism and free K-12 school not? Hmm....

                        – Geobits
                        Feb 22 at 21:12






                      • 4





                        In the US (or everywhere?) most of the "means of producing" military safety are owned by the government

                        – Hagen von Eitzen
                        Feb 22 at 21:44






                      • 13





                        This answer is fallacious. Jazz is defined as music characterized by polyphony, syncopation, and improvization. Beethoven's music contains these elements, therefore Beethoven is a jazz composer. Silly.

                        – barbecue
                        Feb 22 at 23:50








                      22




                      22





                      Public goods can be provisioned without the government owning the means of production. "Free college" and "free healthcare" proposals typically consist of the government paying for things on behalf of the consumer, not the federal government owning every college and hospital in America.

                      – Joe
                      Feb 22 at 18:31







                      Public goods can be provisioned without the government owning the means of production. "Free college" and "free healthcare" proposals typically consist of the government paying for things on behalf of the consumer, not the federal government owning every college and hospital in America.

                      – Joe
                      Feb 22 at 18:31






                      13




                      13





                      I didn't know that most industrialized countries (which provide some form of free healthcare and free education) are socialist countries. Please call Theresa May and tell her that she leads a socialist government. :-)

                      – Martin Schröder
                      Feb 22 at 19:52







                      I didn't know that most industrialized countries (which provide some form of free healthcare and free education) are socialist countries. Please call Theresa May and tell her that she leads a socialist government. :-)

                      – Martin Schröder
                      Feb 22 at 19:52






                      17




                      17





                      Why is free college socialism and free K-12 school not? Hmm....

                      – Geobits
                      Feb 22 at 21:12





                      Why is free college socialism and free K-12 school not? Hmm....

                      – Geobits
                      Feb 22 at 21:12




                      4




                      4





                      In the US (or everywhere?) most of the "means of producing" military safety are owned by the government

                      – Hagen von Eitzen
                      Feb 22 at 21:44





                      In the US (or everywhere?) most of the "means of producing" military safety are owned by the government

                      – Hagen von Eitzen
                      Feb 22 at 21:44




                      13




                      13





                      This answer is fallacious. Jazz is defined as music characterized by polyphony, syncopation, and improvization. Beethoven's music contains these elements, therefore Beethoven is a jazz composer. Silly.

                      – barbecue
                      Feb 22 at 23:50





                      This answer is fallacious. Jazz is defined as music characterized by polyphony, syncopation, and improvization. Beethoven's music contains these elements, therefore Beethoven is a jazz composer. Silly.

                      – barbecue
                      Feb 22 at 23:50





                      protected by Philipp Feb 22 at 18:26



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      “%fieldName is a required field.”, in Magento2 REST API Call for GET Method Type The Next...

                      How to change City field to a dropdown in Checkout step Magento 2Magento 2 : How to change UI field(s)...

                      夢乃愛華...