What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?When did pilots experience...
Does a semiconductor follow Ohm's law?
What is Niska's accent?
How did Captain America manage to do this?
How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish
Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?
Error message with Tabularx
Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?
What was the first Intel x86 processor with "Base + Index * Scale + Displacement" addressing mode?
The Defining Moment
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
How to get a plain text file version of a CP/M .BAS (M-BASIC) program?
Does Gita support doctrine of eternal cycle of birth and death for evil people?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
Exchange,swap or switch
How to verbalise code in Mathematica?
How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?
Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?
What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?
When did pilots experience blackouts and redouts for the first time?
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
add a comment |
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
add a comment |
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
Today's passenger jets travel the shortest (northern) route, which takes them over Iceland, Greenland, and Newfoundland.
However, that's where the Hindenburg would have encountered the Westerlies, blowing in the opposite direction. I don't think it was capable of rising to sufficient altitude to avoid them.
The trade winds blow well south of that latitude. The southern route is considerably longer.
I haven't been able to find any charts so far.
1930s aviation
1930s aviation
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
edited 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦
56k6194245
56k6194245
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
asked 4 hours ago
RickyRicky
1,8841226
1,8841226
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
1
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
4 hours ago
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
4 hours ago
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52338%2fwhat-route-did-the-hindenburg-take-when-traveling-from-germany-to-the-u-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
1
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
4 hours ago
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
4 hours ago
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
1
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
4 hours ago
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
4 hours ago
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
Airships.net has a page which documents the flights of the Hindenburg. It includes dates, departures, and arrivals and has maps showing the eastbound and westbound flight-paths taken:
(click to enlarge)
I assume the numbers on the charts represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936. The fourth flight of 1936 (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min).
If that chart really is the 10 transatlantic crossings by the Hindenburg in 1936, then interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, the flight at the highest latitudes was also the fastest. I'm guessing that the weather must have cooperated on that occasion. Unfortunately, the closest weather map I've been able to find was dated 15 June 1936, some two weeks before the flight.
Times taken by flights on the eastbound route, from Lakehurst to Frankfurt, were generally faster, as you would expect.
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
answered 4 hours ago
sempaiscuba♦sempaiscuba
56k6194245
56k6194245
1
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
4 hours ago
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
4 hours ago
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
4 hours ago
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
4 hours ago
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
3 hours ago
1
1
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
4 hours ago
And on that trip they had considerable delay, in part due to wind.
– LangLangC
4 hours ago
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
4 hours ago
Yes: I suspected as much. However, the westbound flight path No. 4 would have taken them directly into the westerlies (blowing in the opposite direction). They'd have been bucking into the wind most of the way. What did they do to ... uh ... neutralize the effect?
– Ricky
4 hours ago
1
1
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
3 hours ago
@Ricky Interestingly, assuming those represent the 10 flights to/from Lakehurst in 1936, the fourth (June 30 - July 2) was actually the fastest crossing of the year (52 hrs 49 min). I'm guessing that the weather cooperated on that occasion. Times from Lakehurst to Frankfurt were generally faster, as you would expect.
– sempaiscuba♦
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52338%2fwhat-route-did-the-hindenburg-take-when-traveling-from-germany-to-the-u-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
