A Strange Latex SymbolHow do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?How to draw a coil such that you...

How did Captain America manage to do this?

What language was spoken in East Asia before Proto-Turkic?

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

What are the potential pitfalls when using metals as a currency?

Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?

How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?

Normal Map bad shading in Rendered display

Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer

What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?

How can I practically buy stocks?

A Strange Latex Symbol

Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?

Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?

What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?

In order to check if a field is required or not, is the result of isNillable method sufficient?

How to verbalise code in Mathematica?

Rivers without rain

Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

The Defining Moment

Does a strong solution to a SDE imply lipschitz condition?

What was the first Intel x86 processor with "Base + Index * Scale + Displacement" addressing mode?

How to have a sharp product image?

To say I met a person for the first time



A Strange Latex Symbol


How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?How to draw a coil such that you can see if it's right or left handed?How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageDefine strange operatorsname of logical negation symbol ¬Is there a symbol for “hand-wave”?Currency symbol: French francBitcoin symbol in LaTeX“Average sum” symbolPigpen-like symbol for =Latex math symbol |=A strange symbolHow to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex?













2















In the book ``All of statistics A Concise Course in Statistical Inference'' of Larry Wasserman has a strange symbol, and look like a coil spring ... How can I use it in LaTeX?
here is the strange symbol










share|improve this question







New contributor




Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Similar one: gluon from Table 308 from "the comprehensive LaTeX symbol list”

    – Weijun Zhou
    2 hours ago


















2















In the book ``All of statistics A Concise Course in Statistical Inference'' of Larry Wasserman has a strange symbol, and look like a coil spring ... How can I use it in LaTeX?
here is the strange symbol










share|improve this question







New contributor




Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Similar one: gluon from Table 308 from "the comprehensive LaTeX symbol list”

    – Weijun Zhou
    2 hours ago
















2












2








2


0






In the book ``All of statistics A Concise Course in Statistical Inference'' of Larry Wasserman has a strange symbol, and look like a coil spring ... How can I use it in LaTeX?
here is the strange symbol










share|improve this question







New contributor




Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In the book ``All of statistics A Concise Course in Statistical Inference'' of Larry Wasserman has a strange symbol, and look like a coil spring ... How can I use it in LaTeX?
here is the strange symbol







symbols math-operators






share|improve this question







New contributor




Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









Thomas TínThomas Tín

112




112




New contributor




Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Thomas Tín is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    Similar one: gluon from Table 308 from "the comprehensive LaTeX symbol list”

    – Weijun Zhou
    2 hours ago
















  • 1





    Similar one: gluon from Table 308 from "the comprehensive LaTeX symbol list”

    – Weijun Zhou
    2 hours ago










1




1





Similar one: gluon from Table 308 from "the comprehensive LaTeX symbol list”

– Weijun Zhou
2 hours ago







Similar one: gluon from Table 308 from "the comprehensive LaTeX symbol list”

– Weijun Zhou
2 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Welcome to TeX-SE. I would like to draw your attention to the answers of this question. I base my proposal on the TikZ answer there. A simple (but scalable) coil can be produced with



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
newcommandWasserman{tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width=0.07em,decorate,decoration={coil,segment
length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}}
begin{document}
[ X_1 Wasserman X_2]
end{document}


enter image description here



With some extra amount of work you can make it "boldable" and comply with the different math styles (the above version already becomes large if you say large, of course outside of math mode).



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
usepackage{amsmath}
makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommand{checkbold}[1]{% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
edef@tempa{math@version}edef@tempb{bold}%
ifx@tempa@tempb%
def#1{1}%
else
def#1{0}%
fi}
makeatother
newcommand{WassermanCoil}{checkboldtmp%
ensuremath{mathrel{%
mathchoice{%
tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
}{%
tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
}{%
tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
length=0.36em,amplitude=0.6ex}] (0,0) -- (1.6em,0);}
}{%
tikz[baseline=-0.45ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
length=0.25em,amplitude=0.45ex}] (0,0) -- (1.2em,0);}
}}}}
begin{document}
[ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
boldmath
[ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
unboldmath

{Large AWassermanCoil B} {Huge AWassermanCoil B} {small AWassermanCoil B}

end{document}


enter image description here



One could go even more fancy by employing a 3d coil but I am not going to spell this out unless asked to.



Another thing you can do is to follow CarLaTeX's answer and use trimpclip to clip away one coil of the gluon (that has been mentioned in the comments just now) to get



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym}
usepackage{trimclip}
newcommand{WassermanCoil}{clipbox{0em -1ex 1.65em -1ex}{gluon}%
clipbox{1.7em -1ex 0em -1ex}{gluon}}
begin{document}
[
X_1WassermanCoil X_2
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

































    0














    If the symbol gluon hadn't existed, or you drew the symbol with TikZ or you can use, for example, the package circuitikz. Adding also the scalerel package allows you to adjust the size of the symbol as you wish.



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article} 
    usepackage{circuitikz}
    usepackage{scalerel}
    newcommand{ngluon}{scaleobj{.7}{begin{tikzpicture}
    draw (.65,0) to [cute inductor] (1.5,0) ;
    end{tikzpicture}}}
    begin{document}
    $X_1,ngluon, X_2|X_3$
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Thomas Tín is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487943%2fa-strange-latex-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Welcome to TeX-SE. I would like to draw your attention to the answers of this question. I base my proposal on the TikZ answer there. A simple (but scalable) coil can be produced with



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
      newcommandWasserman{tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width=0.07em,decorate,decoration={coil,segment
      length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}}
      begin{document}
      [ X_1 Wasserman X_2]
      end{document}


      enter image description here



      With some extra amount of work you can make it "boldable" and comply with the different math styles (the above version already becomes large if you say large, of course outside of math mode).



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
      usepackage{amsmath}
      makeatletter
      DeclareRobustCommand{checkbold}[1]{% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
      edef@tempa{math@version}edef@tempb{bold}%
      ifx@tempa@tempb%
      def#1{1}%
      else
      def#1{0}%
      fi}
      makeatother
      newcommand{WassermanCoil}{checkboldtmp%
      ensuremath{mathrel{%
      mathchoice{%
      tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
      length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
      }{%
      tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
      length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
      }{%
      tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
      length=0.36em,amplitude=0.6ex}] (0,0) -- (1.6em,0);}
      }{%
      tikz[baseline=-0.45ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
      length=0.25em,amplitude=0.45ex}] (0,0) -- (1.2em,0);}
      }}}}
      begin{document}
      [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
      boldmath
      [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
      unboldmath

      {Large AWassermanCoil B} {Huge AWassermanCoil B} {small AWassermanCoil B}

      end{document}


      enter image description here



      One could go even more fancy by employing a 3d coil but I am not going to spell this out unless asked to.



      Another thing you can do is to follow CarLaTeX's answer and use trimpclip to clip away one coil of the gluon (that has been mentioned in the comments just now) to get



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym}
      usepackage{trimclip}
      newcommand{WassermanCoil}{clipbox{0em -1ex 1.65em -1ex}{gluon}%
      clipbox{1.7em -1ex 0em -1ex}{gluon}}
      begin{document}
      [
      X_1WassermanCoil X_2
      ]
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer






























        3














        Welcome to TeX-SE. I would like to draw your attention to the answers of this question. I base my proposal on the TikZ answer there. A simple (but scalable) coil can be produced with



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
        newcommandWasserman{tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width=0.07em,decorate,decoration={coil,segment
        length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}}
        begin{document}
        [ X_1 Wasserman X_2]
        end{document}


        enter image description here



        With some extra amount of work you can make it "boldable" and comply with the different math styles (the above version already becomes large if you say large, of course outside of math mode).



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
        usepackage{amsmath}
        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommand{checkbold}[1]{% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
        edef@tempa{math@version}edef@tempb{bold}%
        ifx@tempa@tempb%
        def#1{1}%
        else
        def#1{0}%
        fi}
        makeatother
        newcommand{WassermanCoil}{checkboldtmp%
        ensuremath{mathrel{%
        mathchoice{%
        tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
        length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
        }{%
        tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
        length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
        }{%
        tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
        length=0.36em,amplitude=0.6ex}] (0,0) -- (1.6em,0);}
        }{%
        tikz[baseline=-0.45ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
        length=0.25em,amplitude=0.45ex}] (0,0) -- (1.2em,0);}
        }}}}
        begin{document}
        [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
        boldmath
        [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
        unboldmath

        {Large AWassermanCoil B} {Huge AWassermanCoil B} {small AWassermanCoil B}

        end{document}


        enter image description here



        One could go even more fancy by employing a 3d coil but I am not going to spell this out unless asked to.



        Another thing you can do is to follow CarLaTeX's answer and use trimpclip to clip away one coil of the gluon (that has been mentioned in the comments just now) to get



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amsmath}
        usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym}
        usepackage{trimclip}
        newcommand{WassermanCoil}{clipbox{0em -1ex 1.65em -1ex}{gluon}%
        clipbox{1.7em -1ex 0em -1ex}{gluon}}
        begin{document}
        [
        X_1WassermanCoil X_2
        ]
        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer




























          3












          3








          3







          Welcome to TeX-SE. I would like to draw your attention to the answers of this question. I base my proposal on the TikZ answer there. A simple (but scalable) coil can be produced with



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
          newcommandWasserman{tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width=0.07em,decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}}
          begin{document}
          [ X_1 Wasserman X_2]
          end{document}


          enter image description here



          With some extra amount of work you can make it "boldable" and comply with the different math styles (the above version already becomes large if you say large, of course outside of math mode).



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          makeatletter
          DeclareRobustCommand{checkbold}[1]{% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
          edef@tempa{math@version}edef@tempb{bold}%
          ifx@tempa@tempb%
          def#1{1}%
          else
          def#1{0}%
          fi}
          makeatother
          newcommand{WassermanCoil}{checkboldtmp%
          ensuremath{mathrel{%
          mathchoice{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
          }{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
          }{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.36em,amplitude=0.6ex}] (0,0) -- (1.6em,0);}
          }{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.45ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.25em,amplitude=0.45ex}] (0,0) -- (1.2em,0);}
          }}}}
          begin{document}
          [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
          boldmath
          [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
          unboldmath

          {Large AWassermanCoil B} {Huge AWassermanCoil B} {small AWassermanCoil B}

          end{document}


          enter image description here



          One could go even more fancy by employing a 3d coil but I am not going to spell this out unless asked to.



          Another thing you can do is to follow CarLaTeX's answer and use trimpclip to clip away one coil of the gluon (that has been mentioned in the comments just now) to get



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym}
          usepackage{trimclip}
          newcommand{WassermanCoil}{clipbox{0em -1ex 1.65em -1ex}{gluon}%
          clipbox{1.7em -1ex 0em -1ex}{gluon}}
          begin{document}
          [
          X_1WassermanCoil X_2
          ]
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          Welcome to TeX-SE. I would like to draw your attention to the answers of this question. I base my proposal on the TikZ answer there. A simple (but scalable) coil can be produced with



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
          newcommandWasserman{tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width=0.07em,decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}}
          begin{document}
          [ X_1 Wasserman X_2]
          end{document}


          enter image description here



          With some extra amount of work you can make it "boldable" and comply with the different math styles (the above version already becomes large if you say large, of course outside of math mode).



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{tikz}
          usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          makeatletter
          DeclareRobustCommand{checkbold}[1]{% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24635/121799
          edef@tempa{math@version}edef@tempb{bold}%
          ifx@tempa@tempb%
          def#1{1}%
          else
          def#1{0}%
          fi}
          makeatother
          newcommand{WassermanCoil}{checkboldtmp%
          ensuremath{mathrel{%
          mathchoice{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
          }{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.8ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.06em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.45em,amplitude=0.8ex}] (0,0) -- (2em,0);}
          }{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.6ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.045em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.36em,amplitude=0.6ex}] (0,0) -- (1.6em,0);}
          }{%
          tikz[baseline=-0.45ex]{draw[line width={(1+0.33*tmp)*0.035em},decorate,decoration={coil,segment
          length=0.25em,amplitude=0.45ex}] (0,0) -- (1.2em,0);}
          }}}}
          begin{document}
          [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
          boldmath
          [ X_1 WassermanCoil X_2 X_{Y_1 WassermanCoil Y_2}]
          unboldmath

          {Large AWassermanCoil B} {Huge AWassermanCoil B} {small AWassermanCoil B}

          end{document}


          enter image description here



          One could go even more fancy by employing a 3d coil but I am not going to spell this out unless asked to.



          Another thing you can do is to follow CarLaTeX's answer and use trimpclip to clip away one coil of the gluon (that has been mentioned in the comments just now) to get



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym}
          usepackage{trimclip}
          newcommand{WassermanCoil}{clipbox{0em -1ex 1.65em -1ex}{gluon}%
          clipbox{1.7em -1ex 0em -1ex}{gluon}}
          begin{document}
          [
          X_1WassermanCoil X_2
          ]
          end{document}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          marmotmarmot

          122k6159297




          122k6159297























              0














              If the symbol gluon hadn't existed, or you drew the symbol with TikZ or you can use, for example, the package circuitikz. Adding also the scalerel package allows you to adjust the size of the symbol as you wish.



              enter image description here



              documentclass{article} 
              usepackage{circuitikz}
              usepackage{scalerel}
              newcommand{ngluon}{scaleobj{.7}{begin{tikzpicture}
              draw (.65,0) to [cute inductor] (1.5,0) ;
              end{tikzpicture}}}
              begin{document}
              $X_1,ngluon, X_2|X_3$
              end{document}





              share|improve this answer




























                0














                If the symbol gluon hadn't existed, or you drew the symbol with TikZ or you can use, for example, the package circuitikz. Adding also the scalerel package allows you to adjust the size of the symbol as you wish.



                enter image description here



                documentclass{article} 
                usepackage{circuitikz}
                usepackage{scalerel}
                newcommand{ngluon}{scaleobj{.7}{begin{tikzpicture}
                draw (.65,0) to [cute inductor] (1.5,0) ;
                end{tikzpicture}}}
                begin{document}
                $X_1,ngluon, X_2|X_3$
                end{document}





                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  If the symbol gluon hadn't existed, or you drew the symbol with TikZ or you can use, for example, the package circuitikz. Adding also the scalerel package allows you to adjust the size of the symbol as you wish.



                  enter image description here



                  documentclass{article} 
                  usepackage{circuitikz}
                  usepackage{scalerel}
                  newcommand{ngluon}{scaleobj{.7}{begin{tikzpicture}
                  draw (.65,0) to [cute inductor] (1.5,0) ;
                  end{tikzpicture}}}
                  begin{document}
                  $X_1,ngluon, X_2|X_3$
                  end{document}





                  share|improve this answer













                  If the symbol gluon hadn't existed, or you drew the symbol with TikZ or you can use, for example, the package circuitikz. Adding also the scalerel package allows you to adjust the size of the symbol as you wish.



                  enter image description here



                  documentclass{article} 
                  usepackage{circuitikz}
                  usepackage{scalerel}
                  newcommand{ngluon}{scaleobj{.7}{begin{tikzpicture}
                  draw (.65,0) to [cute inductor] (1.5,0) ;
                  end{tikzpicture}}}
                  begin{document}
                  $X_1,ngluon, X_2|X_3$
                  end{document}






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 46 mins ago









                  SebastianoSebastiano

                  11.7k42366




                  11.7k42366






















                      Thomas Tín is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Thomas Tín is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Thomas Tín is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Thomas Tín is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487943%2fa-strange-latex-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      迭戈·戈丁...

                      A phrase ”follow into" in a context The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are...

                      1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer...