Python: pythonic way to find last position in string that does not match regexIs there a way to run Python on...

Please, smoke with good manners

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

How can I use Monero RPC via Python

Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?

Counterexample: a pair of linearly ordered sets that are isomorphic to subsets of the other, but not isomorphic between them

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?

What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `a{b,c}d` (braces)?

Rivers without rain

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?

How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?

Is there a way to get a compiler for the original B programming language?

What does YCWCYODFTRFDTY mean?

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?

How can I place the product on a social media post better?

Question relating to a number theoretic function

Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

Minimum value of 4 digit number divided by sum of its digits

Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics



Python: pythonic way to find last position in string that does not match regex


Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonNicest way to pad zeroes to a stringDoes Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to substring a string in Python?Getting the last element of a list in PythonReverse a string in PythonDoes Python have a string 'contains' substring method?How do I lowercase a string in Python?Most elegant way to check if the string is empty in Python?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







6















In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.










share|improve this question

























  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    3 hours ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago




















6















In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.










share|improve this question

























  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    3 hours ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago
















6












6








6


1






In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.










share|improve this question
















In Python I try to find the last position in an arbitrary string that does not match a given pattern, which is specified as regex pattern (that includes the "not" in the match). For example, with the string uiae1iuae200, and the pattern of not being a number (regex pattern in Python for this would be [^0-9]), I would need '8' (the last 'e' before the '200') as result. What is the most pythonic way to achieve this?



As it's a little tricky to quickly find method documentation and the best suited method for something in the Python docs (due to method docs being somewhere in the middle of the corresponding page, like re.search() in the re page), the best way I quickly found myself is using re.search() - but the current form simply must be a suboptimal way of doing it:



import re
string = 'uiae1iuae200' # the string to investigate
len(string) - re.search(r'[^0-9]', string[::-1]).start()


I am not satisfied with this for two reasons: a) I need to reverse string before using it with [::-1], and b) I also need to reverse the resulting position (subtracting it from len(string) because of having reversed the string before. There needs to be better ways for this, likely even with the result of re.search().



I am aware of re.search(...).end() over .start(), but re.search() seems to split the results into groups, for which I did not quickly find a not-cumbersome way to apply it to the last matched group. Without specifying the group, .start(), .end(), etc, seem to always match the first group, which does not have the position information about the last match. However, selecting the group seems to at first require the return value to temporarily be saved in a variable (which prevents neat one-liners), as I would need to access both the information about selecting the last group and then to select .end() from this group.



What's your pythonic solution to this? I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime.



Update



The solution should be functional also in corner cases, like 123 (no position that matches the regex), empty string, etc. It should not crash e.g. because of selecting the last index of an empty list. However, as even my ugly answer above in the question would need more than one line for this, I guess a one-liner might be impossible for this (simply because one needs to check the return value of re.search() or re.finditer() before handling it). I'll accept pythonic multi-line solutions to this answer for this reason.







python regex string regex-negation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







geekoverdose

















asked 3 hours ago









geekoverdosegeekoverdose

727615




727615













  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    3 hours ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago





















  • last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

    – dgumo
    3 hours ago











  • Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago








  • 1





    With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago



















last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

– dgumo
3 hours ago





last position that does 'not' or does match regex? Last e matches [^0-9] pattern.

– dgumo
3 hours ago













Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago





Last position that does not match a certain pattern, like being a number. For numbers this would be [^0-9]. I'll update the question.

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago













Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

– ruohola
2 hours ago







Should s = 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa' return the index of last char before a digit aka e (8) or the last char aka a (19)?

– ruohola
2 hours ago






1




1





With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago







With uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa it should return the last position in the string, means 19.

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago














3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8


Edit:
For making the solution a bit more elegant to behave properly in for all kind of inputs, here is the updated code. Now the solution goes in two lines as the check has to be performed if list is empty then it will print -1 else the index value.



import re

arr = ['', '123', 'uiae1iuae200', 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa']

for s in arr:
lst = [m.start() for m in re.finditer(r'D', s)]
print(s, '-->', lst[-1] if len(lst) > 0 else -1)


Prints the following, where if no such index is found then prints -1 instead of index.



 --> -1
123 --> -1
uiae1iuae200 --> 8
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa --> 19





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @ruohola: Ok, just saw the requirement got a bit updated. Let me update my solution to take care that.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    23 mins ago



















2














This is a really clean way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)


 





Here's my original very pythonic and efficient answer:

(Which unfortunately will throw a ValueError when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
*_, last = re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string)
print(last.start())





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • You defaced your original answer which was actually great. Now both your solutions uselessly clug the memory, and are no longer readable.

    – Right leg
    34 mins ago











  • @Rightleg Doesn't matter since the original answer was not working with the updated requirements so it was pretty much worthless. But I edited it back since you're right about it being so clean.

    – ruohola
    19 mins ago



















0














This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.

    – Julian Camilleri
    2 hours ago












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55890245%2fpython-pythonic-way-to-find-last-position-in-string-that-does-not-match-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8


Edit:
For making the solution a bit more elegant to behave properly in for all kind of inputs, here is the updated code. Now the solution goes in two lines as the check has to be performed if list is empty then it will print -1 else the index value.



import re

arr = ['', '123', 'uiae1iuae200', 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa']

for s in arr:
lst = [m.start() for m in re.finditer(r'D', s)]
print(s, '-->', lst[-1] if len(lst) > 0 else -1)


Prints the following, where if no such index is found then prints -1 instead of index.



 --> -1
123 --> -1
uiae1iuae200 --> 8
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa --> 19





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @ruohola: Ok, just saw the requirement got a bit updated. Let me update my solution to take care that.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    23 mins ago
















2














You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8


Edit:
For making the solution a bit more elegant to behave properly in for all kind of inputs, here is the updated code. Now the solution goes in two lines as the check has to be performed if list is empty then it will print -1 else the index value.



import re

arr = ['', '123', 'uiae1iuae200', 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa']

for s in arr:
lst = [m.start() for m in re.finditer(r'D', s)]
print(s, '-->', lst[-1] if len(lst) > 0 else -1)


Prints the following, where if no such index is found then prints -1 instead of index.



 --> -1
123 --> -1
uiae1iuae200 --> 8
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa --> 19





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @ruohola: Ok, just saw the requirement got a bit updated. Let me update my solution to take care that.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    23 mins ago














2












2








2







You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8


Edit:
For making the solution a bit more elegant to behave properly in for all kind of inputs, here is the updated code. Now the solution goes in two lines as the check has to be performed if list is empty then it will print -1 else the index value.



import re

arr = ['', '123', 'uiae1iuae200', 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa']

for s in arr:
lst = [m.start() for m in re.finditer(r'D', s)]
print(s, '-->', lst[-1] if len(lst) > 0 else -1)


Prints the following, where if no such index is found then prints -1 instead of index.



 --> -1
123 --> -1
uiae1iuae200 --> 8
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa --> 19





share|improve this answer















You can use re.finditer to extract start positions of all matches and return the last one from list. Try this Python code (apologies if it is non-Pythonic as I am quite new to Python),



import re
print([m.start(0) for m in re.finditer(r'D', 'uiae1iuae200')][-1])


Prints,



8


Edit:
For making the solution a bit more elegant to behave properly in for all kind of inputs, here is the updated code. Now the solution goes in two lines as the check has to be performed if list is empty then it will print -1 else the index value.



import re

arr = ['', '123', 'uiae1iuae200', 'uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa']

for s in arr:
lst = [m.start() for m in re.finditer(r'D', s)]
print(s, '-->', lst[-1] if len(lst) > 0 else -1)


Prints the following, where if no such index is found then prints -1 instead of index.



 --> -1
123 --> -1
uiae1iuae200 --> 8
uiae1iuae200aaaaaaaa --> 19






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 20 mins ago

























answered 3 hours ago









Pushpesh Kumar RajwanshiPushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi

13.7k21331




13.7k21331








  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @ruohola: Ok, just saw the requirement got a bit updated. Let me update my solution to take care that.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    23 mins ago














  • 1





    Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago











  • This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @ruohola: Ok, just saw the requirement got a bit updated. Let me update my solution to take care that.

    – Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
    23 mins ago








1




1





Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

– ruohola
2 hours ago







Nice answer, edited it a bit to remove unnecessary index shifting.

– ruohola
2 hours ago















@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
2 hours ago





@ruohola: Many thanks for improving my answer. Logically I had the idea but not exactly how to do it as new to Python. I appreciate.

– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
2 hours ago




1




1





Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago





Upside: one-liner possible (move the [-1] one line up). Downside: list comprehension required. Still a very good take on my question I guess!

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago













This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

– ruohola
1 hour ago





This will throw an IndexError on the new requirement case string = '123'.

– ruohola
1 hour ago













@ruohola: Ok, just saw the requirement got a bit updated. Let me update my solution to take care that.

– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
23 mins ago





@ruohola: Ok, just saw the requirement got a bit updated. Let me update my solution to take care that.

– Pushpesh Kumar Rajwanshi
23 mins ago













2














This is a really clean way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)


 





Here's my original very pythonic and efficient answer:

(Which unfortunately will throw a ValueError when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
*_, last = re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string)
print(last.start())





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • You defaced your original answer which was actually great. Now both your solutions uselessly clug the memory, and are no longer readable.

    – Right leg
    34 mins ago











  • @Rightleg Doesn't matter since the original answer was not working with the updated requirements so it was pretty much worthless. But I edited it back since you're right about it being so clean.

    – ruohola
    19 mins ago
















2














This is a really clean way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)


 





Here's my original very pythonic and efficient answer:

(Which unfortunately will throw a ValueError when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
*_, last = re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string)
print(last.start())





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • You defaced your original answer which was actually great. Now both your solutions uselessly clug the memory, and are no longer readable.

    – Right leg
    34 mins ago











  • @Rightleg Doesn't matter since the original answer was not working with the updated requirements so it was pretty much worthless. But I edited it back since you're right about it being so clean.

    – ruohola
    19 mins ago














2












2








2







This is a really clean way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)


 





Here's my original very pythonic and efficient answer:

(Which unfortunately will throw a ValueError when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
*_, last = re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string)
print(last.start())





share|improve this answer















This is a really clean way, which works perfectly with the new requirement:

(printing None with no errors when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
ls = list(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string))
print(ls[-1].start() if ls else None)



Output:



8



Or alternatively using collections.deque:



import re
from collections import deque

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
que = deque(re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string), maxlen=1)
print(que.pop().start() if que else None)


 





Here's my original very pythonic and efficient answer:

(Which unfortunately will throw a ValueError when string = '123')



import re

string = 'uiae1iuae200'
*_, last = re.finditer(r'[^0-9]', string)
print(last.start())






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 10 mins ago

























answered 2 hours ago









ruoholaruohola

2,117424




2,117424








  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • You defaced your original answer which was actually great. Now both your solutions uselessly clug the memory, and are no longer readable.

    – Right leg
    34 mins ago











  • @Rightleg Doesn't matter since the original answer was not working with the updated requirements so it was pretty much worthless. But I edited it back since you're right about it being so clean.

    – ruohola
    19 mins ago














  • 1





    This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • @geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

    – ruohola
    1 hour ago











  • You defaced your original answer which was actually great. Now both your solutions uselessly clug the memory, and are no longer readable.

    – Right leg
    34 mins ago











  • @Rightleg Doesn't matter since the original answer was not working with the updated requirements so it was pretty much worthless. But I edited it back since you're right about it being so clean.

    – ruohola
    19 mins ago








1




1





This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago





This goes towards what I am aiming for. Will test it when I have time!

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago




1




1





@Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

– ruohola
1 hour ago





@Rightleg True, but OP said I would value being pythonic more than having the most optimized runtime., so I don't think he'll need to do this to a huge string.

– ruohola
1 hour ago













@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

– ruohola
1 hour ago





@geekoverdose Added new solutions which answer your updated requirements :)

– ruohola
1 hour ago













You defaced your original answer which was actually great. Now both your solutions uselessly clug the memory, and are no longer readable.

– Right leg
34 mins ago





You defaced your original answer which was actually great. Now both your solutions uselessly clug the memory, and are no longer readable.

– Right leg
34 mins ago













@Rightleg Doesn't matter since the original answer was not working with the updated requirements so it was pretty much worthless. But I edited it back since you're right about it being so clean.

– ruohola
19 mins ago





@Rightleg Doesn't matter since the original answer was not working with the updated requirements so it was pretty much worthless. But I edited it back since you're right about it being so clean.

– ruohola
19 mins ago











0














This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.

    – Julian Camilleri
    2 hours ago
















0














This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.

    – Julian Camilleri
    2 hours ago














0












0








0







This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.






share|improve this answer













This does not look Pythonic because it's not a one-liner, and it uses range(len(foo)), but it's pretty straightforward and probably not too inefficient.



def last_match(pattern, string):
for i in range(1, len(string) + 1):
substring = string[-i:]
if re.match(pattern, substring):
return len(string) - i


The idea is to iterate over the suffixes of string from the shortest to the longest, and to check if it matches pattern.



Since we're checking from the end, we know for sure that the first substring we meet that matches the pattern is the last.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Right legRight leg

8,70342450




8,70342450








  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.

    – Julian Camilleri
    2 hours ago














  • 2





    This is just not pythonic at all.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago











  • I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

    – geekoverdose
    2 hours ago













  • @ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

    – Right leg
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

    – ruohola
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.

    – Julian Camilleri
    2 hours ago








2




2





This is just not pythonic at all.

– ruohola
2 hours ago





This is just not pythonic at all.

– ruohola
2 hours ago













I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago







I've come up with something similar to this, but I am not satisfied with its structure. A pythonic one-liner that is easily understand- and maintainable would be preferred. If this really is one of the most pythonic ways to achieve my goal, then I feel like filing a bug report with Python for this.

– geekoverdose
2 hours ago















@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

– Right leg
2 hours ago





@ruohola I'm interested to hear your criteria.

– Right leg
2 hours ago




1




1





This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

– ruohola
2 hours ago





This is not very readable, uses the range(len(foo)) antipattern, is quite a lot of lines etc. It's a valid solution, but when OP asked specifically for a 'pythonic' solution, I don't feel like this cuts it.

– ruohola
2 hours ago




1




1





I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.

– Julian Camilleri
2 hours ago





I think you guys are confusing what pythonic is. Zen of python: "Readability counts." A crunched one liner doesn't mean its pythonic.

– Julian Camilleri
2 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55890245%2fpython-pythonic-way-to-find-last-position-in-string-that-does-not-match-regex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

迭戈·戈丁...

A phrase ”follow into" in a context The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are...

1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer...