Which sins are beyond punishment?Parashat PekudeiPurim and Shushan PurimOrder of punishments/responsibilities...
How to lift/raise/repair a segment of concrete slab?
Calculating Hyperbolic Sin faster than using a standard power series
Is it possible to make a clamp function shorter than a ternary in JS?
In iTunes 12 on macOS, how can I reset the skip count of a song?
What is the difference between a forward slip and a side slip?
Sometimes a banana is just a banana
At what level can a party fight a mimic?
Book about a time-travel war fought by computers
What should the omniscient narrator call a character?
Practical reasons to have both a large police force and bounty hunting network?
Why can't we make a perpetual motion machine by using a magnet to pull up a piece of metal, then letting it fall back down?
What are the issues with an additional (limited) concentration slot instead of Bladesong?
How can I be pwned if I'm not registered on the compromised site?
A bug in Excel? Conditional formatting for marking duplicates also highlights unique value
Can a space-faring robot still function over a billion years?
Roots of 6th chords on the guitar for different inversions/voicings
How to kill a localhost:8080
Every subset equal to original set?
How to substitute values from a list into a function?
Does "legal poaching" exist?
Misplaced tyre lever - alternatives?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?
Non-Italian European mafias in USA?
Which sins are beyond punishment?
Parashat PekudeiPurim and Shushan PurimOrder of punishments/responsibilities in viduyPunishment in this World or in the World To ComeDo you get credit for unintentional mitzvot?Are criminals rehabilitated after punishment?Punishment for sins one cannot now be expected to avoidWhat were Naomi's sins?Are thoughts of sin punished halachically?Which sins are specifically punished with drought?Which sins are specifically punished with earthquake?Implications of “According to Your fear is Your anger” (“כיראתך עברתך”)
Yishai said in a comment elsewhere on this forum :
It has been pointed out in Rishonim that some sins are so bad they
can't get a punishment - because the punishment creates forgiveness,
but when the sin is too great, forgiveness is not an option.
- Which sins are these and who are the Rishonim that said this?
- How could a sin be so great so as to be beyond punishment, when even the gravest sins are not [they are punished by capital punishment]?
reward-punishment rishonim
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
add a comment |
Yishai said in a comment elsewhere on this forum :
It has been pointed out in Rishonim that some sins are so bad they
can't get a punishment - because the punishment creates forgiveness,
but when the sin is too great, forgiveness is not an option.
- Which sins are these and who are the Rishonim that said this?
- How could a sin be so great so as to be beyond punishment, when even the gravest sins are not [they are punished by capital punishment]?
reward-punishment rishonim
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
I recall hearing some variation of this thought applied to the whole idea of Pharaoh's heart being hardened during the Makkos.
– Salmononius2
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Yishai said in a comment elsewhere on this forum :
It has been pointed out in Rishonim that some sins are so bad they
can't get a punishment - because the punishment creates forgiveness,
but when the sin is too great, forgiveness is not an option.
- Which sins are these and who are the Rishonim that said this?
- How could a sin be so great so as to be beyond punishment, when even the gravest sins are not [they are punished by capital punishment]?
reward-punishment rishonim
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
Yishai said in a comment elsewhere on this forum :
It has been pointed out in Rishonim that some sins are so bad they
can't get a punishment - because the punishment creates forgiveness,
but when the sin is too great, forgiveness is not an option.
- Which sins are these and who are the Rishonim that said this?
- How could a sin be so great so as to be beyond punishment, when even the gravest sins are not [they are punished by capital punishment]?
reward-punishment rishonim
reward-punishment rishonim
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
asked 3 hours ago
user9806user9806
21716
21716
I recall hearing some variation of this thought applied to the whole idea of Pharaoh's heart being hardened during the Makkos.
– Salmononius2
24 mins ago
add a comment |
I recall hearing some variation of this thought applied to the whole idea of Pharaoh's heart being hardened during the Makkos.
– Salmononius2
24 mins ago
I recall hearing some variation of this thought applied to the whole idea of Pharaoh's heart being hardened during the Makkos.
– Salmononius2
24 mins ago
I recall hearing some variation of this thought applied to the whole idea of Pharaoh's heart being hardened during the Makkos.
– Salmononius2
24 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I found something attributed to the Semag (one of the last ba'alei Tosfos), but first some background.
There's a prohibition of offering one's children to Molech, a type of avodah zara. Leviticus 18:21 states:
וּמִֽזַּרְעֲךָ֥ לֹא־תִתֵּ֖ן לְהַעֲבִ֣יר לַמֹּ֑לֶךְ וְלֹ֧א תְחַלֵּ֛ל אֶת־שֵׁ֥ם אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ אֲנִ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
Do not allow any of your offspring to be offered up to Molech, and do not profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.
The gemara in Sanhedrin 64a discusses this in more depth, lots of rishonim weigh in, and Sefer Chinuch, Mitzvah 208 codifies this. The punishment for passing one's child to Molech is death by stoning.
The Semag (סמ"ג · לאו · מ) makes a WILD inference.
העביר כל זרעו פטור שנאמר כי מזרעו נתן למולך מקצת זרעו ולא כל זרעו ויש טעם בזה לתשובת המינים מפני שבמיתת ב"ד מתכפרין המומתין וזה עשה כל כך עבירה גדולה שאין הקב"ה רוצה שיהא לו שום כפרה
If one passed all oh his children [to Molech] he is exempt [from being put to death via beis din], because it says [a person who gives] from his seed to Molech. ie some of his seed, not all of his seed, and there is a reason for this to answer the heretics, namely that death via beis din redeems the said person who was put to death, and this person [who passed ALL of his children to Molech] did such a huge aveirah that Hashem doesn't want him to get this redemption via being put to death via beis din
Bottom line: the Semag says the punishment of stoning is only for a person that gives "some" of his children to Molech. But if that person gave "all" of his children to Molech, it's such a big aveirah that we don't give him a kaparah by putting him to death.
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I found something attributed to the Semag (one of the last ba'alei Tosfos), but first some background.
There's a prohibition of offering one's children to Molech, a type of avodah zara. Leviticus 18:21 states:
וּמִֽזַּרְעֲךָ֥ לֹא־תִתֵּ֖ן לְהַעֲבִ֣יר לַמֹּ֑לֶךְ וְלֹ֧א תְחַלֵּ֛ל אֶת־שֵׁ֥ם אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ אֲנִ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
Do not allow any of your offspring to be offered up to Molech, and do not profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.
The gemara in Sanhedrin 64a discusses this in more depth, lots of rishonim weigh in, and Sefer Chinuch, Mitzvah 208 codifies this. The punishment for passing one's child to Molech is death by stoning.
The Semag (סמ"ג · לאו · מ) makes a WILD inference.
העביר כל זרעו פטור שנאמר כי מזרעו נתן למולך מקצת זרעו ולא כל זרעו ויש טעם בזה לתשובת המינים מפני שבמיתת ב"ד מתכפרין המומתין וזה עשה כל כך עבירה גדולה שאין הקב"ה רוצה שיהא לו שום כפרה
If one passed all oh his children [to Molech] he is exempt [from being put to death via beis din], because it says [a person who gives] from his seed to Molech. ie some of his seed, not all of his seed, and there is a reason for this to answer the heretics, namely that death via beis din redeems the said person who was put to death, and this person [who passed ALL of his children to Molech] did such a huge aveirah that Hashem doesn't want him to get this redemption via being put to death via beis din
Bottom line: the Semag says the punishment of stoning is only for a person that gives "some" of his children to Molech. But if that person gave "all" of his children to Molech, it's such a big aveirah that we don't give him a kaparah by putting him to death.
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
add a comment |
I found something attributed to the Semag (one of the last ba'alei Tosfos), but first some background.
There's a prohibition of offering one's children to Molech, a type of avodah zara. Leviticus 18:21 states:
וּמִֽזַּרְעֲךָ֥ לֹא־תִתֵּ֖ן לְהַעֲבִ֣יר לַמֹּ֑לֶךְ וְלֹ֧א תְחַלֵּ֛ל אֶת־שֵׁ֥ם אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ אֲנִ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
Do not allow any of your offspring to be offered up to Molech, and do not profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.
The gemara in Sanhedrin 64a discusses this in more depth, lots of rishonim weigh in, and Sefer Chinuch, Mitzvah 208 codifies this. The punishment for passing one's child to Molech is death by stoning.
The Semag (סמ"ג · לאו · מ) makes a WILD inference.
העביר כל זרעו פטור שנאמר כי מזרעו נתן למולך מקצת זרעו ולא כל זרעו ויש טעם בזה לתשובת המינים מפני שבמיתת ב"ד מתכפרין המומתין וזה עשה כל כך עבירה גדולה שאין הקב"ה רוצה שיהא לו שום כפרה
If one passed all oh his children [to Molech] he is exempt [from being put to death via beis din], because it says [a person who gives] from his seed to Molech. ie some of his seed, not all of his seed, and there is a reason for this to answer the heretics, namely that death via beis din redeems the said person who was put to death, and this person [who passed ALL of his children to Molech] did such a huge aveirah that Hashem doesn't want him to get this redemption via being put to death via beis din
Bottom line: the Semag says the punishment of stoning is only for a person that gives "some" of his children to Molech. But if that person gave "all" of his children to Molech, it's such a big aveirah that we don't give him a kaparah by putting him to death.
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
add a comment |
I found something attributed to the Semag (one of the last ba'alei Tosfos), but first some background.
There's a prohibition of offering one's children to Molech, a type of avodah zara. Leviticus 18:21 states:
וּמִֽזַּרְעֲךָ֥ לֹא־תִתֵּ֖ן לְהַעֲבִ֣יר לַמֹּ֑לֶךְ וְלֹ֧א תְחַלֵּ֛ל אֶת־שֵׁ֥ם אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ אֲנִ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
Do not allow any of your offspring to be offered up to Molech, and do not profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.
The gemara in Sanhedrin 64a discusses this in more depth, lots of rishonim weigh in, and Sefer Chinuch, Mitzvah 208 codifies this. The punishment for passing one's child to Molech is death by stoning.
The Semag (סמ"ג · לאו · מ) makes a WILD inference.
העביר כל זרעו פטור שנאמר כי מזרעו נתן למולך מקצת זרעו ולא כל זרעו ויש טעם בזה לתשובת המינים מפני שבמיתת ב"ד מתכפרין המומתין וזה עשה כל כך עבירה גדולה שאין הקב"ה רוצה שיהא לו שום כפרה
If one passed all oh his children [to Molech] he is exempt [from being put to death via beis din], because it says [a person who gives] from his seed to Molech. ie some of his seed, not all of his seed, and there is a reason for this to answer the heretics, namely that death via beis din redeems the said person who was put to death, and this person [who passed ALL of his children to Molech] did such a huge aveirah that Hashem doesn't want him to get this redemption via being put to death via beis din
Bottom line: the Semag says the punishment of stoning is only for a person that gives "some" of his children to Molech. But if that person gave "all" of his children to Molech, it's such a big aveirah that we don't give him a kaparah by putting him to death.
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
I found something attributed to the Semag (one of the last ba'alei Tosfos), but first some background.
There's a prohibition of offering one's children to Molech, a type of avodah zara. Leviticus 18:21 states:
וּמִֽזַּרְעֲךָ֥ לֹא־תִתֵּ֖ן לְהַעֲבִ֣יר לַמֹּ֑לֶךְ וְלֹ֧א תְחַלֵּ֛ל אֶת־שֵׁ֥ם אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ אֲנִ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
Do not allow any of your offspring to be offered up to Molech, and do not profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.
The gemara in Sanhedrin 64a discusses this in more depth, lots of rishonim weigh in, and Sefer Chinuch, Mitzvah 208 codifies this. The punishment for passing one's child to Molech is death by stoning.
The Semag (סמ"ג · לאו · מ) makes a WILD inference.
העביר כל זרעו פטור שנאמר כי מזרעו נתן למולך מקצת זרעו ולא כל זרעו ויש טעם בזה לתשובת המינים מפני שבמיתת ב"ד מתכפרין המומתין וזה עשה כל כך עבירה גדולה שאין הקב"ה רוצה שיהא לו שום כפרה
If one passed all oh his children [to Molech] he is exempt [from being put to death via beis din], because it says [a person who gives] from his seed to Molech. ie some of his seed, not all of his seed, and there is a reason for this to answer the heretics, namely that death via beis din redeems the said person who was put to death, and this person [who passed ALL of his children to Molech] did such a huge aveirah that Hashem doesn't want him to get this redemption via being put to death via beis din
Bottom line: the Semag says the punishment of stoning is only for a person that gives "some" of his children to Molech. But if that person gave "all" of his children to Molech, it's such a big aveirah that we don't give him a kaparah by putting him to death.
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
answered 1 hour ago
alichtalicht
1,389225
1,389225
add a comment |
add a comment |
I recall hearing some variation of this thought applied to the whole idea of Pharaoh's heart being hardened during the Makkos.
– Salmononius2
24 mins ago