Gsyfuy

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Python - Fishing Simulator

Take groceries in checked luggage

Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?

Derivation tree not rendering

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Does the AirPods case need to be around while listening via an iOS Device?

Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

Scientific Reports - Significant Figures

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Finding degree of a finite field extension

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

How to prevent selfdestruct from another contract

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

Why use ultrasound for medical imaging?

1

$begingroup$

What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?

energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics

share|cite|improve this question

edited 55 mins ago

Qmechanic♦

108k122001245

asked 1 hour ago

Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19511

New contributor

Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
  $endgroup$
  – Ubaid Hassan
  16 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
  $endgroup$
  – dmckee♦
  12 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?

energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics

share|cite|improve this question

edited 55 mins ago

Qmechanic♦

108k122001245

asked 1 hour ago

Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19511

New contributor

Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  your edits are quite helpful, but can I ask why you do edits so frequently?
  $endgroup$
  – Ubaid Hassan
  16 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Tagging is important, it helps people find things, helps the system that auto-identified related content, and enables meaningful analysis of site usage patterns. BUt good tagging takes time, attention to detail, and a minimum level of expertise so that you can identify the relevant tags.
  $endgroup$
  – dmckee♦
  12 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

What advantage does ultrasound have over sound between 20-20000Hz that it is used in medical imaging over sound in that frequency range?

energy acoustics frequency wavelength medical-physics

share|cite|improve this question

edited 55 mins ago

Qmechanic♦

108k122001245

asked 1 hour ago

Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19511

New contributor

Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited 55 mins ago

Qmechanic♦

108k122001245

asked 1 hour ago

Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19511

New contributor

Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|cite|improve this question

edited 55 mins ago

Qmechanic♦

108k122001245

asked 1 hour ago

Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19511

New contributor

Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 55 mins ago

Qmechanic♦

108k122001245

edited 55 mins ago

Qmechanic♦

108k122001245

asked 1 hour ago

Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19511

New contributor

Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 1 hour ago

Ubaid HassanUbaid Hassan

19511

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

4

$begingroup$

I think the simple answer here is resolution.

Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.

If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by

$$lambda = {c over f} $$

so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....

The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate

$$lambda = 0.001 {rm m} = 1 {rm mm}$$

At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 38 mins ago

answered 57 mins ago

tomtom

6,38711627

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
  $endgroup$
  – Ubaid Hassan
  13 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
  $endgroup$
  – dmckee♦
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

Higher frequency provides higher resolution.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 57 mins ago

akhmeteliakhmeteli

18.5k21844

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Ubaid Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472565%2fwhy-use-ultrasound-for-medical-imaging%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

4

$begingroup$

I think the simple answer here is resolution.

Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.

If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by

$$lambda = {c over f} $$

so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....

The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate

$$lambda = 0.001 {rm m} = 1 {rm mm}$$

At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 38 mins ago

answered 57 mins ago

tomtom

6,38711627

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
  $endgroup$
  – Ubaid Hassan
  13 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
  $endgroup$
  – dmckee♦
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

$begingroup$

I think the simple answer here is resolution.

Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.

If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by

$$lambda = {c over f} $$

so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....

The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate

$$lambda = 0.001 {rm m} = 1 {rm mm}$$

At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 38 mins ago

answered 57 mins ago

tomtom

6,38711627

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Is it correct to say wavelength is inversely proportional to resolution? Or that sound wave frequency is directly proportional to resolution?
  $endgroup$
  – Ubaid Hassan
  13 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The correct statement is in terms of wavelength. That said, for non-dispersive waves (which is reasonably true for sound) in consistent media (not really true for medical ultra-sounds) the wavelength statements implies the frequency one as a corollary.
  $endgroup$
  – dmckee♦
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I think the simple answer here is resolution.

Generally when imaging with waves (including light) the limit to resolution is a length that is similar to the wavelength, $lambda$.

If $f$ is the frequency and $c$ is the speed of the wave then the wavelength is given by

$$lambda = {c over f} $$

so the higher we make $f$ the smaller $lambda$ becomes and the better the resolution and the more detail we can see in scans....

The speed of sound in water is ~1500 m/s and with say 1.5 MHz = 1 500 000 Hz frequency we calculate

$$lambda = 0.001 {rm m} = 1 {rm mm}$$

At 20000 Hz $lambda = 75$ mm

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 38 mins ago

answered 57 mins ago

tomtom

6,38711627

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

edited 38 mins ago

answered 57 mins ago

tomtom

6,38711627

answered 57 mins ago

tomtom

6,38711627

answered 57 mins ago

tomtom

6,38711627

1

$begingroup$

Higher frequency provides higher resolution.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 57 mins ago

akhmeteliakhmeteli

18.5k21844

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

Higher frequency provides higher resolution.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 57 mins ago

akhmeteliakhmeteli

18.5k21844

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Higher frequency provides higher resolution.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 57 mins ago

akhmeteliakhmeteli

18.5k21844

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 57 mins ago

akhmeteliakhmeteli

18.5k21844

answered 57 mins ago

akhmeteliakhmeteli

18.5k21844

answered 57 mins ago

akhmeteliakhmeteli

18.5k21844