Gsyfuy

Logistic regression BIC: what's the right N?

How can a demon take control of a human body during REM sleep?

Short scifi story where reproductive organs are converted to produce "materials", pregnant protagonist is "found fit" to be a mother

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

How do I increase the number of TTY consoles?

Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Locked Away- What am I?

What will happen if my luggage gets delayed?

What is this tube in a jet engine's air intake?

Difference between `nmap local-IP-address` and `nmap localhost`

Strange opamp's output impedance in spice

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

How do I raise a figure (placed with wrapfig) to be flush with the top of a paragraph?

ESPP--any reason not to go all in?

Are E natural minor and B harmonic minor related?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

When to use a QR code on a business card?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?

What does *dead* mean in *What do you mean, dead?*?

Translation of 答えを知っている人はいませんでした

Who is performing the actions in this sentence?MySpyPhone TranslationNature TranslationTranslation-Question:The difference between my translation and native Japanese`s translationIs my translation correct?Translation doubtsSentence translation helpColloquial Japanese TranslationHomework translation

2

I started studying studying Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide by Naomi McGloin et al. In section 1.2 there's following example:

[おどろいたことに、] 答えを知っている人はいませんでした。

Which is translated as:

[Surprisingly,] no one knew the answer.

This translation sounds a bit off to me. I'd say that the sentence roughly translates to "[Surprisingly,] person who know the answer is absent", which isn't equivalent to provided translation. I guess it'd be more adequate if the original sentence was something like "[おどろいたことに、] 誰も答えを知らない". I think that difference between "no one knew" and "person who know was not here" is quite stark. Second one implies presence of someone who know while first one does not.

Is this an error in the book or do I understand it incorrectly?

translation

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

PrestoPresto

182

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.
  
  – Aeon Akechi
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

I started studying studying Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide by Naomi McGloin et al. In section 1.2 there's following example:

[おどろいたことに、] 答えを知っている人はいませんでした。

Which is translated as:

[Surprisingly,] no one knew the answer.

This translation sounds a bit off to me. I'd say that the sentence roughly translates to "[Surprisingly,] person who know the answer is absent", which isn't equivalent to provided translation. I guess it'd be more adequate if the original sentence was something like "[おどろいたことに、] 誰も答えを知らない". I think that difference between "no one knew" and "person who know was not here" is quite stark. Second one implies presence of someone who know while first one does not.

Is this an error in the book or do I understand it incorrectly?

translation

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

PrestoPresto

182

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  'Surprisingly, there was no one who knew the answer', is more or less what it is literally.
  
  – Aeon Akechi
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  while I agree that when teaching a language, if you adapt the translation for the target language, you should be clear you're doing so, to avoid confusion. "There was not a (single) person who knew the answer" (Literal) and "No one knew the answer" is pretty much the same.
  
  – Felipe Oliveira
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I started studying studying Modern Japanese Grammar: A Practical Guide by Naomi McGloin et al. In section 1.2 there's following example:

[おどろいたことに、] 答えを知っている人はいませんでした。

Which is translated as:

[Surprisingly,] no one knew the answer.

This translation sounds a bit off to me. I'd say that the sentence roughly translates to "[Surprisingly,] person who know the answer is absent", which isn't equivalent to provided translation. I guess it'd be more adequate if the original sentence was something like "[おどろいたことに、] 誰も答えを知らない". I think that difference between "no one knew" and "person who know was not here" is quite stark. Second one implies presence of someone who know while first one does not.

Is this an error in the book or do I understand it incorrectly?

translation

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

PrestoPresto

182

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

PrestoPresto

182

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

PrestoPresto

182

asked 4 hours ago

PrestoPresto

182

asked 4 hours ago

PrestoPresto

182

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

2

"To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:

1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent


2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist

You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.

• 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.


• ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.

Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65928%2ftranslation-of-%25e7%25ad%2594%25e3%2581%2588%25e3%2582%2592%25e7%259f%25a5%25e3%2581%25a3%25e3%2581%25a6%25e3%2581%2584%25e3%2582%258b%25e4%25ba%25ba%25e3%2581%25af%25e3%2581%2584%25e3%2581%25be%25e3%2581%259b%25e3%2582%2593%25e3%2581%25a7%25e3%2581%2597%25e3%2581%259f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

"To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:

1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent


2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist

You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.

• 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.


• ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.

Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

2

"To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:

1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent


2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist

You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.

• 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.


• ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.

Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

add a comment | 

"To be absent" is not the only translation of いない. Xはいない can mean both of the following:

1. X is (temporarily) not here; X is away; X is absent


2. There is no X (anywhere); X does not exist

You have to determine the correct interpretation from the context. Usually it's fairly easy.

• 宇宙人はいない。 Extraterrestrial intelligence does not exist.


• ネッシーはいない。 There is no Nessie.

Regarding 答えを知っている人はいませんでした, it's indeed ambiguous, at least technically speaking. If 答えを知っている人 has been already introduced in the universe of discourse and a listener/reader understands who is that person in this context, then your interpretation may be possible. Otherwise, "There was no one who knew the answer" is the natural interpretation of this sentence.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299

answered 1 hour ago

narutonaruto

160k8153299